AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core i5-14500HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains benchmark scores for the Intel Core i5-14500HX, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark entries in the database. This makes a direct score-by-score comparison impossible. The analysis must therefore rely on the Intel part's measured results and the architectural data for both processors.

The Intel Core i5-14500HX delivers strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24234 points in the multi-core test and 3421 points in the single-core test. The Cinebench R20 results show 10178 points multi-core and 1436 points single-core, while Cinebench R15 records 2442 points multi-core and 344 points single-core. These scores place the processor at the 84th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

The Geekbench scores follow a similar pattern. The Intel chip posts a multi-core score of 10171 and a single-core score of 2129. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 28508 and a single-thread score of 3629. The data compression test records 333851 points, while data encryption reaches 19502 points. Floating point math scores 69442 points, integer math scores 95584 points, and extended instructions score 20019 points. The find prime numbers test returns 130 points, random string sorting scores 36219 points, and the physics test records 1911 points.

The nearest rivals in the database help contextualize these results. The Intel Core i9-12900HX has an average score of 35003, which is 0.3 percent below the i5-14500HX. The Intel Core i7-13800H averages 34988 points, also 0.3 percent lower. The Intel Core 7 253PTE averages 34962 points, 0.4 percent lower. The Intel Core i7-12700K averages 35287 points, placing it 0.5 percent above the i5-14500HX. These deltas are very small, indicating that the i5-14500HX sits in a dense performance cluster where differences between adjacent parts are minimal.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has an average benchmark score of zero and a 50th percentile ranking. No measured scores exist for this part in the database. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for both processors are zero. This means the database cannot confirm any performance advantage for the AMD part in any workload category.

The Intel processor's 84th percentile ranking versus the AMD part's 50th percentile ranking does not directly compare the two, because the AMD percentile reflects the absence of data rather than a measured performance level. The Intel part's percentile is derived from actual benchmark submissions. The AMD part's percentile is a placeholder for an unmeasured processor.

The Verdict

The data supports the Intel Core i5-14500HX as the only part with verified performance measurements. Its multi-core scores, such as 24234 in Cinebench R23 and 28508 in PassMark multithread, establish a concrete performance baseline. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.5 percent in average score, confirm that it performs at the level of high-end desktop and mobile processors from previous generations.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 cannot be evaluated on performance grounds because the database contains no benchmark submissions for it. Any claim of superiority for the AMD part would lack measured support. The Intel part, by contrast, has nineteen recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark.

The Intel Core i5-14500HX also holds a higher percentile ranking at 84, versus 50 for the AMD part. This percentile gap reflects data availability, but it is the only metric the database provides for comparing their standings among all CPUs. Based strictly on recorded data, the Intel part is the one with demonstrated performance credentials.

A user selecting between these two processors would, according to the database, have quantitative evidence only for the Intel part. The AMD part's architecture and specifications may be appealing, but no measured results exist to support a performance-based choice.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ fundamentally in their underlying design. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14500HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series, and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

The AMD processor has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel processor has 14 cores and 20 threads. Both parts support 20 threads, but the Intel part achieves this with more physical cores. The AMD part's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Intel part starts at a higher base frequency, while the AMD part has a slightly higher boost frequency.

Cache configurations differ as well. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part provides more L2 per core and more total L3 cache.

The thermal design power differs substantially. The AMD part is rated at 28 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 55 watts. This indicates the AMD part targets a lower power envelope, which may affect sustained performance in thermally constrained systems.

Memory support also differs. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, but the database records no memory bandwidth figure for it. Both processors support ECC memory.

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD part uses a Radeon 880M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770. The PCIe interface also differs: the AMD part provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

The die size and production details differ as well. The AMD die measures 233 mm², while the Intel die measures 257 mm². The AMD part releases on 2026-02-28, and the Intel part releases on 2024-01-07. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD part does not. The Intel part has a part number of SRMXJ; the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX has 14 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores. Both support 20 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 boosts to 5.00 GHz, and the Intel Core i5-14500HX boosts to 4.90 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX ranks at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 ranks at the 50th percentile. The AMD part has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: What is the thermal design power of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a TDP of 28 watts, and the Intel Core i5-14500HX has a TDP of 55 watts.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Core i5-14500HX supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses and support ECC memory.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14500HX wins in every category where measured data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24234 and single-core score of 3421 provide a baseline for both threaded and single-threaded workloads. Its Geekbench multi-core score of 10171 and single-core score of 2129 reinforce this pattern. The PassMark suite shows broad strength across integer math (95584), floating point math (69442), and multithread (28508) tests.

The Intel part also wins in data-intensive tasks according to the recorded scores. Data compression scores 333851 points, data encryption scores 19502 points, and random string sorting scores 36219 points. Extended instructions score 20019 points, and physics scores 1911 points. The find prime numbers test returns 130 points, which is the lowest recorded score but still a measured result.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no recorded wins because the database contains no benchmark scores for it. Its architectural features may provide advantages in specific scenarios, but the database cannot substantiate any such advantage with numbers. The AMD part's lower 28 watt TDP suggests it targets lower-power systems, and its support for LPDDR5X memory indicates a focus on integrated memory designs. Its Radeon 880M integrated graphics differ from the Intel UHD Graphics 770, but no graphics benchmarks exist for either part in the database.

For workloads that rely on multi-threaded performance, the Intel part's 14 cores and 24 MB of shared L3 cache provide a structural advantage. For workloads that rely on higher boost clocks, the AMD part's 5.00 GHz boost is 0.10 GHz higher than the Intel part's 4.90 GHz. The database does not contain measurements that confirm whether this frequency advantage translates into real-world wins.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core i5-14500HX uses Intel BGA 1964. The AMD part has 10 cores and 20 threads; the Intel part has 14 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.60 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.00 GHz for AMD and 4.90 GHz for Intel.

The L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD part and 2 MB per core on the Intel part. The L3 cache is 16 MB on the AMD part and 24 MB shared on the Intel part. The process node is 4 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel. The die size is 233 mm² for AMD and 257 mm² for Intel.

Memory support differs, with the AMD part supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, and the Intel part supporting DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; the Intel part has no recorded bandwidth. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes on the AMD part and Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the Intel part. The integrated graphics are Radeon 880M on the AMD part and UHD Graphics 770 on the Intel part.

The TDP is 28 watts for the AMD part and 55 watts for the Intel part. The multiplier is locked on the AMD part and unlocked on the Intel part. The release dates are 2026-02-28 for the AMD part and 2024-01-07 for the Intel part. The Intel part has a part number of SRMXJ, while the AMD part's part number is unknown. The production status for both is Active, and both target the Mobile market segment.