AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 against the Intel Core i5-14490F. The head-to-head comparison field is empty, and the AMD part has no recorded benchmark scores of any kind. This means there are no direct performance numbers to compare between the two processors.

For the Intel Core i5-14490F, the database records a comprehensive set of benchmark results across Cinebench and PassMark workloads. Its average benchmark score is 38,149, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, which reflects the absence of measured data rather than actual performance equivalence.

Without direct measurements for the AMD part, the only meaningful comparison comes from the Intel side. In Cinebench R23, the i5-14490F scores 23,000 in multi-core and 3,247 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it records 9,660 multi-core and 1,363 single-core. Cinebench R15 shows 2,318 multi-core and 327 single-core. These numbers establish a baseline for the Intel processor, but they cannot be weighed against AMD figures that do not exist in the database.

PassMark results for the Intel part include integer math at 87,844, floating point math at 66,558, extended instructions at 21,731, data compression at 340,026, and data encryption at 18,225. The multi-threaded score is 28,662, while single-thread performance registers at 3,873. Physics scoring reaches 2,093, random string sorting hits 35,608, and prime number finding completes at 122.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-14490F provide context for its standing. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38,194, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38,103, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38,221, a 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38,261, a 0.3% difference. The i5-14490F sits within a tight cluster of comparable processors, with all deltas under half a percent.

Where Each One Wins

The absence of benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 means the database cannot substantiate any performance wins for that processor. No Cinebench scores, no PassMark scores, and no average benchmark score exist for the AMD part. The wins tally shows 0 for the AMD processor and 0 for the Intel processor, reflecting the empty head-to-head field.

For the Intel Core i5-14490F, the recorded data shows strengths across several workload categories. PassMark integer math at 87,844 indicates solid general-purpose arithmetic throughput. Floating point math at 66,558 demonstrates capability in scientific and graphics-related calculations. Extended instructions at 21,731 suggest competence in vectorized and specialized instruction workloads. Data compression at 340,026 points to strong performance in file archiving and data processing tasks. Data encryption at 18,225 indicates moderate cryptographic throughput.

The Cinebench results position the Intel part as a capable multi-threaded performer. The R23 multi-core score of 23,000 places it well within desktop processor territory, while the single-core score of 3,247 shows competitive per-thread performance. The R20 and R15 scores follow the same pattern.

Since the AMD processor has no measurements, the database cannot assign it wins in any category. The Intel processor's wins are implicit through its recorded scores, but the overall win count remains 0 for both parts because the head-to-head comparison has no data points.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core i5 generation based on Raptor Lake Refresh architecture. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 215 mm².

The process node difference is significant: the AMD part uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel. This represents a considerable manufacturing technology gap that affects transistor density and power characteristics.

Cache configurations differ between the two processors. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. For L3 cache, the AMD processor has 16 MB, while the Intel processor has 24 MB shared across all cores.

The AMD processor includes integrated graphics in the form of a Radeon 880M. The Intel processor has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A. This is a notable architectural difference, as the AMD part can drive displays without a discrete graphics card.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. ECC memory support is present on the AMD processor but absent on the Intel processor.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and Intel Core i5-14490F share identical core counts at 10 cores, but thread counts differ. The AMD part has 20 threads, while the Intel part has 16 threads. Base clock speeds differ: the AMD processor runs at 2.00 GHz, while the Intel processor runs at 2.50 GHz. Both boost to 5.00 GHz.

Thermal design power differs substantially. The AMD processor has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 65 watts. This indicates the AMD part is designed for lower power envelopes, consistent with its mobile market segment, while the Intel part targets desktop use.

Socket compatibility differs completely. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. These sockets are not interchangeable.

PCIe support differs by generation and lane count. The AMD processor supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation.

Memory bus width is the same at dual-channel for both. The AMD processor has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor has no recorded memory bandwidth value.

Market segments differ: the AMD processor is classified as Mobile, while the Intel processor is classified as Desktop. Release dates differ as well. The AMD processor has a release date of 2026-02-28, while the Intel processor has a release date of 2023-12-31.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part lists its production status as Active, and the Intel part also lists Active. The Intel processor has a part number of SRN35, while the AMD processor lists its part number as unknown.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: Both processors have 10 cores. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has 16 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock speed for each processor?

A: Both processors boost to 5.00 GHz. Their base clocks differ: the AMD part runs at 2.00 GHz, and the Intel part runs at 2.50 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has a TDP of 65 watts.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 includes a Radeon 880M integrated graphics solution. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-14490F does not support ECC memory.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38,149. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark data is recorded for it.

The Verdict

The database contains no benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174, making a performance verdict impossible from recorded data. The Intel Core i5-14490F has a complete set of measurements, with an average score of 38,149 and an 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals all sit within 0.3% of its average score, indicating tight competition in its performance class.

For users selecting between these two processors, the data supports the Intel part only in terms of measured performance. The i5-14490F delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,000 and a single-core score of 3,247, with strong PassMark results across integer math, floating point math, and data compression workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 offers architectural advantages that the database records but cannot quantify through benchmarks. Its 4 nm process node, 28 watt TDP, integrated Radeon 880M graphics, ECC memory support, and 20 threads all represent specification-level strengths. The mobile market segment and FP8 socket suggest deployment in embedded or portable systems where power efficiency matters more than raw throughput.

The Intel part targets desktop builds with its Socket 1700, 65 watt TDP, and PCIe Gen 5 support. Its 24 MB of L3 cache exceeds the AMD part's 16 MB, and its per-core L2 cache of 1.25 MB beats the AMD part's 1 MB per core. The Intel processor also supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, offering broader memory compatibility.

Without AMD benchmark scores, the verdict must rest on specification differences and the Intel part's measured results. The i5-14490F is the only processor in this comparison with recorded performance data, and that data shows a capable desktop processor sitting at the 86th percentile with near-identical performance to its closest rivals. The AMD part remains a specification-only entry, with its actual performance unverified in the database.