AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core i5-14400 Comparison

The Verdict

The data in the database separates these two processors clearly by market segment and performance class. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is a mobile-focused part with a 28 TDP, designed for embedded and portable systems where power efficiency is paramount. The Intel Core i5-14400 is a desktop processor with a 65 TDP, aimed at mainstream desktop builds that prioritize raw throughput.

Benchmark results indicate a decisive advantage for the Intel part. The Core i5-14400 records an average benchmark score of 32115, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The AMD P174 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, and its percentile sits at 50. The Intel chip's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i7-12800H (avg score 32121, delta 0%) and Intel Core i9-11900 (avg score 32226, delta -0.3%), cluster tightly around its performance level, confirming it delivers competitive multi-threaded desktop performance.

The AMD P174, with its higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz but a much lower 28 TDP, presents a different tradeoff. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm node from its own foundry. The P174 is built on the Gorgon Point codename with Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores, whereas the i5-14400 uses Raptor Lake architecture. For users prioritizing sustained heavy workloads and known benchmark performance, the data points to the Intel Core i5-14400. For those designing embedded or mobile systems where the 28 TDP envelope and integrated Radeon 880M graphics are critical, the AMD P174 is the only choice given the specifications. The P174 is not a desktop competitor; it is a different class of product entirely.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their underlying design. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i5-14400 uses the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R codename) and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 215 mm².

Core counts are identical at 10 cores, but thread counts differ significantly. The AMD part supports 20 threads, indicating a hybrid arrangement of high-performance and high-efficiency Zen 5 cores. The Intel part supports 16 threads, which is consistent with a mix of Performance-cores and Efficient-cores in the Raptor Lake design. Cache layouts also differ. The AMD P174 has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel i5-14400 has 80 KB of L1 per core, a larger 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support shows a clear split. The AMD P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD P174 uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel i5-14400 uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are distinct, with the AMD part featuring a Radeon 880M and the Intel part featuring UHD Graphics 730.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table in the database is empty, and the wins counters show 0 for both parts. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so direct numerical comparisons between the two are not possible from the recorded data. However, the Intel Core i5-14400 has a comprehensive set of benchmark results that can be interpreted on its own.

The Intel part's Cinebench scores show strong multi-threaded capability. It records 2148 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 8952 in R20 multi-core, and 21315 in R23 multi-core. Single-core scores are 303 in R15, 1263 in R20, and 3009 in R23. Geekbench results show 9807 in multi-core and 1905 in single-core. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 25080 and a single-thread score of 3741 (recorded twice in the database under slightly different test names).

The Intel part's nearest rivals in the database provide context for these scores. The Intel Core i7-12800H has an average score of 32121 with a delta of 0%, meaning the i5-14400 is essentially tied with it. The Intel Core i7-13705H scores 32076 with a delta of 0.1%, indicating the i5-14400 is 0.1% ahead. The Intel Core i5-14450HX scores 32040 with a delta of 0.2%, again showing the i5-14400 slightly ahead. The Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226 with a delta of -0.3%, meaning the i9-11900 is 0.3% ahead of the i5-14400. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, placing the i5-14400 in a very tight performance cluster.

The AMD P174's situation is different. With no benchmark scores and a 50th percentile ranking, the database offers no measured evidence of its performance against the Intel part. The only quantitative data available for the AMD chip is its clock speeds (2.00 GHz base, 5.00 GHz boost) and its 28 TDP, which indicates a power-constrained design. The Intel part's base clock is 2.50 GHz and boost clock is 4.70 GHz, both lower than the AMD boost, but the Intel part has a much higher TDP to sustain those clocks.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two processors in the database:

• Threads: AMD 20, Intel 16
• Base clock: AMD 2.00 GHz, Intel 2.50 GHz
• Boost clock: AMD 5.00 GHz, Intel 4.70 GHz
• TDP: AMD 28, Intel 65
• Socket: AMD Socket FP8, Intel Socket 1700
• Architecture: AMD Gorgon Point (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), Intel Raptor Lake
• Process node: AMD 4 nm (TSMC), Intel 10 nm (Intel)
• Die size: AMD 233 mm², Intel 215 mm²
• L2 cache per core: AMD 1 MB, Intel 1.25 MB
• L3 cache: AMD 16 MB, Intel 20 MB (shared)
• Memory support: AMD DDR5, LPDDR5X; Intel DDR4, DDR5
• Memory bandwidth: AMD 89.6 GB/s, Intel not listed
• PCIe: AMD Gen 4, 16 lanes; Intel Gen 5, 16 lanes
• Integrated graphics: AMD Radeon 880M, Intel UHD Graphics 730
• Market segment: AMD Mobile, Intel Desktop
• Release date: AMD 2026-02-28, Intel 2024-01-07
• Launch MSRP: AMD null, Intel $221
• Benchmark scores: AMD none, Intel all listed
• Percentile: AMD 50, Intel 82
• Average benchmark score: AMD 0, Intel 32115
• Part number: AMD unknown, Intel SRN3QSRN46

Fields that are the same include cores (10 each), L1 cache (80 KB per core), dual-channel memory bus, ECC support, and multiplier unlock status (both locked).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14400 has 16 threads. Both have 10 cores.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD P174 has a TDP of 28, while the Intel i5-14400 has a TDP of 65. This indicates the AMD part is designed for much lower power envelopes.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD P174 boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel i5-14400 boosts to 4.70 GHz. The Intel part has a higher base clock at 2.50 GHz versus 2.00 GHz for the AMD.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14400 support DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the database lists DDR4 and DDR5 as memory support for the Intel part. The AMD P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X only.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14400?

A: The Intel part has an average benchmark score of 32115, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The AMD P174 has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor use?

A: The AMD P174 uses Radeon 880M graphics, while the Intel i5-14400 uses UHD Graphics 730.