AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core i3-14100T Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core i3-14100T occupy distinct positions in the processor landscape, with the former targeting embedded mobile systems and the latter serving mainstream desktop builds. The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two specific models, but the available specification data and the Intel chip’s recorded performance metrics provide a basis for comparison. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark entries in the database, while the Core i3-14100T has a full suite of Cinebench and PassMark results. This asymmetry requires an analysis grounded primarily in architectural and feature differences, supplemented by the Intel part’s measured scores where relevant.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct benchmark comparisons are impossible because the database lists no scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174. The Intel Core i3-14100T, however, has 17 recorded benchmark results. In Cinebench R23, the Core i3-14100T achieves a multicore score of 11612 and a single-core score of 1639. In Cinebench R20, it records 4877 multicore and 688 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 1170 multicore and 165 single-core. These numbers place the Intel chip at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 17648.

The Ryzen AI Embedded P174, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, reflecting the absence of any measured data. The nearest rivals for the Core i3-14100T provide context for its performance tier. The Intel Core i3-13100F scores 17653, essentially identical with a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core i7-1255U also scores 17656, again 0 percent delta. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE trails slightly at 17614, a 0.2 percent deficit, while the AMD EPYC 9374F leads at 17693, a 0.3 percent advantage. These margins are negligible, indicating the Core i3-14100T performs within a tightly clustered band around its direct competitors.

Given the absence of AMD benchmark data, the only quantitative head-to-head comparison rests on specifications. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 offers 10 cores and 20 threads versus the Core i3-14100T’s 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD part boosts to 5.00 GHz compared to 4.40 GHz for Intel, though its base clock is lower at 2.00 GHz versus 2.70 GHz. The thermal design power differs: 28 watts for AMD, 35 watts for Intel. These figures suggest the AMD processor has a substantial thread-count advantage, but the Intel chip’s higher base clock and smaller core count may favor lightly threaded workloads. Without benchmark scores for the AMD part, the data cannot confirm which processor wins in actual workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-14100T’s recorded benchmarks indicate strength in specific PassMark subtests. Its floating point math score is 31379, integer math is 40292, and extended instructions reach 10414. Data compression scores 152636, while data encryption hits 7881. The multithread score is 13662, single-thread is 3498, and physics reaches 973. Random string sorting records 15579, and find prime numbers scores 56. These numbers depict a processor that handles integer and floating-point operations efficiently for its class, with single-thread performance (3498) that places it in the upper tier of the 71st percentile ranking.

For the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174, the specification sheet suggests advantages in parallel workloads. With 10 cores and 20 threads, the processor doubles the thread count of the Intel part. The 16 MB of L3 cache exceeds the Intel’s 12 MB shared cache. The Radeon 880M integrated graphics represents a more capable GPU solution than Intel’s UHD Graphics 730, though no benchmark data quantifies the difference. The AMD part also supports LPDDR5X memory in addition to DDR5, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD memory bandwidth is rated at 89.6 GB/s, a figure absent for the Intel processor.

The Core i3-14100T wins in the desktop segment, where its Socket 1700 compatibility and 35 watt TDP suit standard builds. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174, with its AMD Socket FP8 and mobile market segment, targets embedded systems where power efficiency (28 watts) and compact integration matter. The Intel chip’s release date of January 2024 gives it a longer presence in the market, while the AMD part’s February 2026 release indicates a newer product aimed at future embedded designs.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in architecture. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC. The die size measures 233 mm². The Intel Core i3-14100T, in contrast, uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen family built on Raptor Lake Refresh. Its process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 163 mm². The smaller node for AMD allows denser transistor packing, though the larger die area suggests a more complex design with additional cores.

Cache hierarchies differ in structure. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part provides 1 MB of L2 per core, while Intel offers 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is 16 MB for AMD and 12 MB shared for Intel. These differences imply AMD’s larger L3 may benefit workloads that repeatedly access a broad working set, while Intel’s higher per-core L2 might aid single-thread latency. The core count disparity (10 versus 4) reflects a design philosophy: AMD emphasizes parallel throughput, Intel prioritizes higher per-core clock speeds and simpler scheduling.

Memory support reveals further divergence. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but lists no bandwidth figure. The inclusion of LPDDR5X in AMD’s portfolio aligns with mobile and embedded use cases, where low-power memory is essential. ECC memory is supported by both, indicating suitability for reliability-focused environments. PCIe capabilities differ: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Intel’s Gen 5 interface doubles the potential bandwidth for compatible devices, though the AMD part’s Gen 4 may suffice for its target segment.

The integrated graphics present a clear contrast. AMD uses Radeon 880M, a modern GPU architecture with substantial compute resources. Intel uses UHD Graphics 730, a basic solution designed for display output rather than intensive rendering. No benchmark scores exist for either GPU, but the architectural difference suggests AMD’s solution handles more demanding visual tasks. The production status for both is listed as active, and neither has an unlocked multiplier, meaning overclocking is not supported on either part.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core i3-14100T has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two?

A: The AMD processor has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz.

Q: How does the thermal design power compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Core i3-14100T has a TDP of 35 watts.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100T supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Does the database contain benchmark scores for the AMD processor?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174. The Intel Core i3-14100T has 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each?

A: The AMD processor has an average benchmark score of 0, with a 50th percentile ranking. The Intel processor has an average benchmark score of 17648, with a 71st percentile ranking.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear asymmetry: the Intel Core i3-14100T has verified performance metrics, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has none. For users requiring immediate, measured performance, the Core i3-14100T’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11612 and single-core score of 1639, along with its PassMark single-thread score of 3498, provide concrete evidence of capability. Its 71st percentile ranking and average score of 17648, nearly identical to the Core i3-13100F and Core i7-1255U, establish it as a reliable mid-tier desktop option.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174, lacking any benchmark data, cannot be recommended on measured performance. Its specifications, however, indicate a different design intent. The 10-core, 20-thread configuration, 5.00 GHz boost clock, 16 MB L3 cache, and 28 watt TDP point toward embedded systems needing parallel processing with low power draw. The Radeon 880M integrated graphics and LPDDR5X support further align with mobile and compact form factors. The 4 nm process node and TSMC fabrication suggest modern manufacturing, while the Intel part’s 10 nm process and Intel foundry represent an older node.

The Intel Core i3-14100T suits desktop builds where single-thread performance and established benchmarks matter. Its 35 watt TDP, Socket 1700 compatibility, and PCIe Gen 5 support make it a straightforward choice for standard motherboards. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 targets embedded applications where the 28 watt TDP, FP8 socket, and integrated Radeon 880M provide a self-contained solution. The absence of AMD benchmarks means any performance claim for that processor remains unverified. The database shows Intel as the measured performer, while AMD offers a specification-rich alternative whose actual throughput is unknown.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 | Intel Core i3-14100T |

|---------------|---------------------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 10 | 4 |

| Threads | 20 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i3 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $134 |

| Part Number | Unknown | SRMX0 |

| Percentile | 50th | 71st |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 17648 |

The table highlights the fundamental differences. The AMD part offers more cores, threads, and cache, with a newer process node and lower TDP. The Intel part counters with higher base clock, smaller die, PCIe Gen 5, and a verified benchmark profile. The release dates place the AMD processor two years later, suggesting a design that benefits from newer manufacturing capabilities. The Intel part’s launch MSRP of $134 provides a reference point, though the AMD part lacks a listed price. Both support ECC memory and lack unlocked multipliers, indicating a focus on stability over enthusiast overclocking. The database records no head-to-head benchmark results, leaving performance comparisons to inference from these specifications.