AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core 7 360 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data does not include direct head-to-head benchmark runs between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core 7 360. The database shows a full benchmark suite for the Intel Core 7 360, but the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark scores listed. The Intel Core 7 360 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,634 and a single-core score of 1,924. In Cinebench R20, the same processor records 5,726 multi-core and 808 single-core. The R15 results show 1,374 multi-core and 193 single-core.

PassMark results for the Intel Core 7 360 show a multi-thread score of 15,544 and a single-thread score of 4,274. The data compression test returns 142,877, while data encryption scores 11,164. Extended instructions reach 12,390, floating point math reaches 44,963, and integer math reaches 34,238. The find prime numbers test is markedly lower at 120, and physics scores 1,213. Random string sorting completes at 17,636.

The AMD unit's average benchmark score is recorded as 0 in the database, with a percentile ranking of 50 against all CPUs. Because no measured scores exist for the AMD part, the database cannot establish which processor wins any specific workload. The Intel Core 7 360 holds a percentile ranking of 72, and its average benchmark score is 18,374. The nearest rivals for the Intel Core 7 360 are the Intel Core i3-13100 at 18,380 (0% delta), the Intel Core 5 330 at 18,345 (0.2% delta), the Intel Core i3-14100 at 18,318 (0.3% delta), and the Intel Core 3 305 at 18,302 (0.4% delta). This places the Intel Core 7 360 within a tight cluster of comparable desktop and mobile parts, all within 0.4% of each other.

The absence of AMD benchmark data means no wins can be attributed to either side. The Intel Core 7 360 demonstrates strong multi-threaded throughput in Cinebench R23, but the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 cannot be compared directly without recorded scores. The database records zero wins for both processors in head-to-head comparisons.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The AMD processor has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. The Intel Core 7 360, by contrast, has 17 recorded benchmark scores.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 360 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 averages 18,374, which is within 0.4% of four rivals: the Intel Core i3-13100 (18,380), Intel Core 5 330 (18,345), Intel Core i3-14100 (18,318), and Intel Core 3 305 (18,302). The largest gap is 0.4% behind the Intel Core 3 305, a negligible difference.

Q: What is the highest single-thread score recorded for the Intel Core 7 360?

A: The highest single-thread result is 4,274 in PassMark single-thread testing. Cinebench R23 single-core reaches 1,924, Cinebench R20 single-core reaches 808, and Cinebench R15 single-core reaches 193.

Q: What is the highest multi-thread score recorded for the Intel Core 7 360?

A: The highest multi-thread result is 15,544 in PassMark multi-thread testing. Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 13,634, Cinebench R20 multi-core reaches 5,726, and Cinebench R15 multi-core reaches 1,374.

Q: Does the AMD processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 360 does not.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 360 boosts to 4.80 GHz. The AMD part also has a higher base clock at 2.00 GHz versus 1.50 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 7 360 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel, and no die size is recorded.

Core configurations differ substantially. The AMD processor has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel processor has 6 cores and 6 threads. The AMD part lacks simultaneous multithreading on all its cores, but its 20 threads give it a 14-thread advantage over the Intel part. Cache structures also diverge. The AMD processor allocates 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of L3. The Intel processor allocates 192 KB of L1 per core and 2.5 MB of L2 per core, with 6 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has larger per-core caches, but the AMD part has a larger total L3 pool.

Memory support shows another split. Both processors support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The AMD processor uses a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel processor uses a single-channel memory bus with 59.7 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD part supports ECC memory; the Intel part does not. PCIe connectivity also differs: the AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU-only lanes, while the Intel processor provides Gen 4 with 6 CPU-only lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD processor ships with a Radeon 880M, while the Intel processor ships with Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. Both processors target the mobile market segment and are currently marked as Active in production. The AMD processor has a locked multiplier, as does the Intel part.

The process node advantage goes to Intel at 3 nm versus AMD's 4 nm, but the AMD part uses more silicon area at 233 mm². The Intel part has no recorded die size, so a direct area comparison is not possible. The AMD processor also carries a later release date of 2026-02-28, while the Intel processor is dated 2026-04-15, meaning the Intel part is the more recent release.

The Verdict

The database contains no benchmark measurements for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174. Its average benchmark score is 0, its percentile rank is 50, and it has no nearest rivals. The Intel Core 7 360 has a full suite of 17 recorded scores, an average of 18,374, and a percentile rank of 72. Based strictly on recorded data, the Intel Core 7 360 is the only processor with demonstrated performance. Any selection between the two must rely on architectural and feature differences rather than measured performance.

For workloads that depend on thread count, the AMD processor offers 20 threads versus the Intel processor's 6 threads. For workloads that depend on memory bandwidth, the AMD processor offers 89.6 GB/s over a dual-channel bus versus 59.7 GB/s over a single-channel bus. For ECC memory requirements, only the AMD processor qualifies. For per-core cache size, the Intel processor provides 192 KB L1 and 2.5 MB L2 per core, which may benefit latency-sensitive single-threaded tasks. For process node efficiency, the Intel processor uses a 3 nm node versus 4 nm. The AMD processor also provides more PCIe lanes at 16 versus 6.

The Intel Core 7 360 carries a launch MSRP of $426, the only price data available. The AMD processor has no launch MSRP recorded. The Intel part's percentile rank of 72 indicates it outperforms the majority of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD part's rank of 50 is neutral due to missing measurements. The Intel Core 7 360's nearest rivals all sit within 0.4% of its average score, confirming that it performs in line with established Intel Core i3 and Core 5 parts.

A user requiring ECC, dual-channel bandwidth, or 20 threads should look to the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174. A user requiring verified benchmark results, a 3 nm node, or a higher database percentile should look to the Intel Core 7 360.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 | Intel Core 7 360 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 10 | 6 |

| Threads | 20 | 6 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Wildcat Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 cache | 80 KB per core | 192 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 2.5 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 16 MB | 6 MB shared |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC memory | Supported | Not supported |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 6 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 880M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Release date | 2026-02-28 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $426 |

| Part number | Unknown | SAE3E |

| Percentile vs all CPUs | 50 | 72 |

| Average benchmark score | 0 | 18,374 |

Both processors share support for DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, target the mobile market segment, and are Active in production. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part is the only one with recorded benchmark data, which explains its higher percentile rank and nonzero average score.