AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently holds no shared benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core 7 350. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither processor records a single common test score. This means a direct comparison between the two parts cannot be made from measured performance data. The Intel Core 7 350 has a complete benchmark profile across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Passmark workloads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no recorded benchmark scores at all, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 across all CPUs.

The Intel Core 7 350 delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8030 and a single-core score of 2046. In Cinebench R20, it posts 5373 multicore and 758 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 run shows 1220 multicore and 292 single-core. Passmark results for the Intel part include a multithread score of 15170, a single-thread score of 4100, integer math at 33734, floating point math at 42809, and data compression at 143123. The data encryption test shows 10933, extended instructions hit 12045, prime number finding scores 107, physics reaches 1173, and random string sorting finishes at 17238.

Since the AMD part has zero recorded benchmarks, no wins can be assigned to either side. The wins counter shows 0 for both processors. The Intel Core 7 350 carries an average benchmark score of 17779, which places it at the 71st percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core 5 221TE with an average score of 17860 and a delta of -0.5 percent, the AMD EPYC 9374F with 17693 and a delta of +0.5 percent, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT with 17891 and a delta of -0.6 percent, and the Intel Core 5 120U with 17898 and a delta of -0.7 percent. These deltas indicate the Core 7 350 sits within a tight cluster of comparable processors, trailing the EPYC 9374F by only half a percent while leading the other three rivals by similar margins.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 cannot be credited with any workload-specific victories because the database contains no benchmark data for it. Its performance profile remains entirely unmeasured. The processor's specifications suggest capabilities, but without recorded scores, no empirical claims can be made about its behavior in any application category.

The Intel Core 7 350 shows its strongest recorded performance in memory-intensive and parallel workloads. The Passmark data compression score of 143123 stands as the highest single result among its recorded tests, indicating strong throughput in data handling tasks. The multithread score of 15170 places it firmly in the mainstream mobile segment, while the single-thread score of 4100 demonstrates respectable per-core capability. The Cinebench R23 single-core result of 2046 confirms that the processor handles lightly threaded workloads with reasonable efficiency.

The Intel part's nearest rival deltas reveal its competitive positioning. Against the Intel Core 5 221TE, the Core 7 350 trails by 0.5 percent in average score. Against the AMD EPYC 9374F, it leads by 0.5 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT sits 0.6 percent ahead, and the Intel Core 5 120U leads by 0.7 percent. These margins are small, all within a single percentage point, so the Core 7 350 occupies a narrow performance band where minor test variations could reorder the ranking.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It packs 10 cores with 20 threads, using a hybrid arrangement of full Zen 5 cores and denser Zen 5c cores. The process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename from the Core 5 generation, built on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. It fields 6 cores and 6 threads, with no hyperthreading support, meaning each core handles exactly one thread.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The AMD part allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part provides 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. The per-core L1 and L2 allocations favor Intel, but the total L3 pool heavily favors AMD, which offers more than double the shared cache. This cache distribution suggests different optimization targets: AMD's larger L3 benefits workloads with repeated data access across cores, while Intel's larger per-core L2 supports single-thread locality.

Memory architecture also diverges. AMD supports dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel uses single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory types. AMD enables ECC memory, Intel does not. PCIe connectivity differs as well: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, Intel provides Gen 4 with only 6 lanes. This gives AMD a substantial advantage in I/O throughput and expansion capability. Integrated graphics differ, with AMD using the Radeon 880M and Intel using the Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. Both processors target the mobile market segment and are currently in active production.

Specification Differences

The two processors diverge on nearly every specification field. Core count: AMD has 10, Intel has 6. Thread count: AMD has 20, Intel has 6. Base clock: AMD runs at 2.00 GHz, Intel at 1.50 GHz. Boost clock: AMD reaches 5.00 GHz, Intel reaches 4.80 GHz. Thermal design power: AMD is rated at 28 watts, Intel at 15 watts. Socket: AMD uses Socket FP8, Intel uses BGA 1516. Process node: AMD uses 4 nm TSMC, Intel uses 3 nm Intel. Die size: AMD measures 233 mm², Intel has no recorded die size. L1 cache: AMD provides 80 KB per core, Intel provides 192 KB per core. L2 cache: AMD provides 1 MB per core, Intel provides 2.5 MB per core. L3 cache: AMD offers 16 MB, Intel offers 6 MB shared. Memory bus: AMD is dual-channel, Intel is single-channel. Memory bandwidth: AMD delivers 89.6 GB/s, Intel delivers 59.7 GB/s. ECC support: AMD includes it, Intel excludes it. PCIe lanes: AMD has 16 Gen 4 lanes, Intel has 6 Gen 4 lanes. Release dates differ, with AMD launching on February 28, 2026, and Intel on April 15, 2026. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $469 and a part number of SAE3F. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP and an unknown part number. Both processors have locked multipliers.

The TDP gap of 13 watts between the two parts has direct implications for sustained performance and system thermals. The AMD part draws more power but also offers more cores and threads, while the Intel part operates at a lower power envelope that suits thinner chassis designs. The boost clock difference is small, just 0.20 GHz, but the base clock gap of 0.50 GHz gives AMD a head start in sustained workloads.

FAQ

Q: Does the database show any direct benchmark comparison between these two processors?

A: No. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has zero recorded benchmark scores. Only the Intel Core 7 350 has benchmark data available in the database.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning it does not support simultaneous multithreading.

Q: Which processor offers higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 7 350 uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s, a difference of roughly 30 GB/s in favor of AMD.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The AMD part boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel part boosts to 4.80 GHz. The base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 1.50 GHz for Intel.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 350 does not support ECC.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 350 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has an average benchmark score of 17779. It trails the Intel Core 5 221TE by 0.5 percent, leads the AMD EPYC 9374F by 0.5 percent, trails the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT by 0.6 percent, and trails the Intel Core 5 120U by 0.7 percent.