AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core 7 253PQE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 7 253PQE dominates the recorded benchmark data, with all available test scores belonging to it. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no individual benchmark results in the database, so direct score-for-score comparisons are impossible. The Intel part posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,390 and a single-core score of 4,431, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The AMD part sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no measured performance data has been recorded for it.

The Intel chip’s average benchmark score of 55,919 places it within 0.2% of the Intel Core i9-14900HX, which averages 56,004. It trails the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 by 0.6%, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 by 0.7%, and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX by 1.1%. These delta values show the Core 7 253PQE operating in the same performance tier as high-end desktop and mobile HX parts, despite being a 10-core processor. The single-thread PassMark score of 4,389 confirms strong per-core performance, while the multi-thread PassMark score of 41,656 shows substantial scaling across all 20 threads.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no recorded wins in the head-to-head data, and the Intel part has no recorded wins either, since the head-to-head benchmark field is empty. The absence of measured results for the AMD chip means the database cannot confirm its performance position. The percentile gap is stark: 91st percentile for Intel versus 50th for AMD, though the AMD percentile may reflect missing data rather than actual performance. The Intel chip’s Cinebench R20 results of 13,183 multi-core and 1,861 single-core, along with its PassMark integer math score of 137,795 and floating point math score of 105,279, provide a complete picture of its computational strengths.

Data compression and encryption workloads favor the Intel part, with PassMark scores of 487,335 and 25,515 respectively. Extended instruction handling scores 32,390, and prime number computation scores 206. The physics test returns 2,970, and random string sorting scores 54,222. Each of these figures reinforces the Intel chip’s balanced profile across integer, floating point, and memory-heavy tasks. Without corresponding AMD results, the only quantitative comparison available is the overall percentile and average score gap.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the same core and thread counts, both offering 10 cores and 20 threads, but they diverge sharply in nearly every other architectural detail. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. Intel’s Core 7 253PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 7 generation. The manufacturing process differs significantly: AMD uses a 4 nm node from TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm node from its own foundry. The AMD die measures 233 mm², while Intel’s die size is not recorded.

Cache hierarchies follow different strategies. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 per core, but the AMD part provides 1 MB of L2 per core, while Intel doubles that to 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is a major differentiator: AMD offers 16 MB total, while Intel provides 33 MB shared. This gives the Intel chip more than twice the last-level cache, which can reduce memory latency in cache-resident workloads. The AMD chip does not list a 3D V-Cache option, and neither chip has a recorded total L3 field.

Memory support overlaps on DDR5, with both parts supporting dual-channel configurations and identical memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The AMD chip also supports LPDDR5X, while Intel adds DDR4 support. Both enable ECC memory, which suits embedded and reliability-focused applications. PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 CPU-only lanes, while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. The newer PCIe standard on the Intel side doubles the theoretical bandwidth available to attached devices.

Integrated graphics also differ. AMD pairs the CPU with a Radeon 880M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The market segments reflect their intended use: AMD targets mobile with a 28 W TDP, while Intel targets desktop with a 125 W TDP. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. Clock speeds are substantially different: the AMD part has a 2.00 GHz base clock and 5.00 GHz boost clock, while the Intel part runs at 3.50 GHz base and 5.70 GHz boost. The Intel chip’s higher base and boost clocks align with its higher power envelope.

The Intel part has a release date of March 8, 2026, about a week after the AMD part’s February 28, 2026 release date. The Intel chip carries a launch MSRP of $409, while the AMD chip has no recorded launch price. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part number is SA4QA, while the AMD part number is listed as unknown.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split by workload and platform. The Intel Core 7 253PQE is the only chip with measured performance, and its results place it in the top 9% of all CPUs. It sits within 0.2% of the Intel Core i9-14900HX and within 1.1% of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, which are far larger and more expensive parts. For users who need a desktop processor with strong multi-threaded throughput, high single-thread performance, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, the Intel chip has the raw scores to justify consideration. Its 125 W TDP and Socket 1700 platform indicate a conventional desktop build with ample cooling.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 targets a different use case. Its 28 W TDP, mobile socket, and LPDDR5X support point toward compact or battery-powered systems where power efficiency is the priority. The 4 nm TSMC process and Zen 5 architecture suggest modern efficiency, but the database contains no benchmark scores to confirm actual performance. The 50th percentile ranking is based on missing data, not measured results, so it should not be read as a performance verdict.

Users who need verified performance numbers should choose the Intel part. Users who require a low-power embedded or mobile processor with ECC support and a Radeon 880M iGPU should evaluate the AMD part on its architecture and specifications, recognizing that no benchmark data exists to validate its speed. The Intel chip’s higher clock speeds, larger L3 cache, and PCIe Gen 5 support give it clear specification-level advantages, while the AMD chip counters with a smaller process node and a much lower power envelope.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PQE boosts to 5.70 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 boosts to 5.00 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core 7 253PQE support ECC memory.

Q: Which chip has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PQE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 16 MB.

Q: What is the Intel processor’s average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PQE has an average benchmark score of 55,919, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel Core 7 253PQE uses a 10 nm Intel process.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 253PQE wins on every measured benchmark in the database. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,390 and single-core score of 4,431 indicate strong performance in rendering and lightly threaded applications. The PassMark integer math score of 137,795 and floating point math score of 105,279 confirm capability in computational workloads. Data compression at 487,335 and encryption at 25,515 show strength in storage and security tasks. The physics score of 2,970 and random string sorting score of 54,222 round out a profile suited to desktop productivity, content creation, and scientific computing. Its PCIe Gen 5 interface supports high-bandwidth GPUs and NVMe storage.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 wins on power efficiency and platform suitability. Its 28 W TDP is dramatically lower than the Intel part’s 125 W, making it appropriate for thin-and-light mobile systems, fanless embedded designs, or applications where thermal output must stay minimal. The 4 nm process node indicates a modern manufacturing approach. The FP8 socket and LPDDR5X support target mobile and embedded form factors. The Radeon 880M integrated graphics likely provide stronger iGPU performance than Intel’s UHD Graphics 770, though no benchmark data confirms this. For systems that prioritize battery life, low heat, or compact size over raw compute, the AMD part has the architectural advantages that matter.

The Intel chip also wins on cache capacity and clock speed. Its 33 MB L3 cache is more than double the AMD chip’s 16 MB, and its 5.70 GHz boost clock is 700 MHz higher. These factors contribute to its measured performance. The AMD chip wins on process node and power draw. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a differentiating factor. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $409, while the AMD chip has no recorded launch price.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel Core 7 253PQE uses a 10 nm Intel process. The AMD die size is 233 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded. L2 cache differs: AMD provides 1 MB per core, Intel provides 2 MB per core. L3 cache differs: AMD has 16 MB total, Intel has 33 MB shared. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. PCIe differs: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 CPU-only lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. Integrated graphics differ: AMD uses Radeon 880M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The AMD chip has a 28 W TDP and uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip has a 125 W TDP and uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz with a 5.00 GHz boost, while the Intel base clock is 3.50 GHz with a 5.70 GHz boost. The AMD chip targets mobile, the Intel chip targets desktop. The AMD part number is unknown, the Intel part number is SA4QA. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $409, the AMD chip has none recorded. The AMD chip released February 28, 2026, and the Intel chip released March 8, 2026. Both have 10 cores, 20 threads, 80 KB L1 per core, ECC support, dual-channel memory, and locked multipliers.