AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core 7 253PE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and Intel Core 7 253PE are both 10-core, 20-thread processors, but they target different market segments and show distinct performance profiles. The Intel part has a recorded benchmark suite, while the AMD part currently has no benchmark data in the database. The Intel Core 7 253PE holds a percentile rank of 87 among all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 sits at the 50th percentile. The Intel processor’s average benchmark score is 40,557, a figure that places it within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H, which scores 40,431, and within 0.1% of the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H, which scores 40,518. The Intel part trails the Intel Core 5 223PE by 0.1%, as that chip scores 40,585, and it leads the Intel Xeon 6357P by 0.2%, which scores 40,630. These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating that the Core 7 253PE competes closely with a cluster of similarly performing processors.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 versus the Intel Core 7 253PE. The AMD part has an empty benchmark array, and the headToHeadBenchmarks field is also empty. Consequently, all quantitative performance analysis must rely exclusively on the Intel Core 7 253PE’s recorded scores, which provide a reference point for what the Intel silicon delivers but offer no direct comparison to the AMD part. The data shows that the Intel Core 7 253PE achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,880 and a single-core score of 3,512. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 10,449, and the single-core score is 1,475. The Cinebench R15 results show a multi-core score of 2,507 and a single-core score of 354.

For the Intel part, the Passmark suite reveals a multi-thread score of 29,271 and a single-thread score of 3,955. Integer math performance reaches 114,158, while floating-point math hits 80,870. Data compression scores 339,133, and data encryption records 18,385. Extended instructions score 21,806, and the find prime numbers test yields 138. Physics processing scores 1,845, and random string sorting records 32,777. These numbers establish a baseline for the Intel Core 7 253PE’s capabilities across rendering, computational workloads, and memory-intensive tasks. Since the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 lacks any recorded scores, the data cannot indicate which processor wins in any specific test. The winsA and winsB fields are both set to zero, confirming that no benchmark results exist to assign a victory to either side.

The absence of AMD data means that any statement about relative performance is unsupported by the recorded measurements. The Intel Core 7 253PE’s scores, however, can be interpreted against its nearest rivals, which all sit within a 0.3% performance delta. The Intel Core 5 223PE scores 40,585, which is 0.1% higher than the Core 7 253PE’s 40,557. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 40,518, which is 0.1% lower. The Intel Xeon 6357P scores 40,630, which is 0.2% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40,431, which is 0.3% lower. These margins are small enough to be considered negligible in practical terms, suggesting that the Core 7 253PE delivers performance that is statistically equivalent to this group of processors.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 7 253PE?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has an average benchmark score of 40,557, which places it at the 87th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 253PE compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE scores 40,557, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40,431. The delta is 0.3%, meaning the Intel part outperforms the AMD part by that margin.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the Intel Core 7 253PE in Passmark?

A: The Passmark single-thread score for the Intel Core 7 253PE is 3,955, and the same score appears under the Passmark single-thread test as 3,955.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has an empty benchmark array. The database contains no scores for this processor, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero.

Q: What is the Cinebench R23 multi-core score for the Intel Core 7 253PE?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,880 and a single-core score of 3,512.

Q: What is the percentile rank of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs, which is substantially lower than the Intel Core 7 253PE’s rank of 87.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that the Intel Core 7 253PE is the only processor with measurable benchmark results. Its average score of 40,557 and 87th percentile ranking demonstrate solid performance, particularly when compared to its nearest rivals, which all fall within a 0.3% delta. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no recorded scores, making any performance comparison impossible from the current database entries. The Intel part also holds a higher percentile position, suggesting that it outperforms a larger share of the CPU population. However, the AMD part’s lack of data means that the verdict must be based solely on the available measurements, which favor the Intel processor by default due to its recorded results. The Intel Core 7 253PE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,880 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 29,271, both of which are substantial figures. The AMD part’s specifications include a 5.00 GHz boost clock and a 10-core, 20-thread configuration, but without benchmarks, its practical performance remains unquantified. The Intel processor’s 5.50 GHz boost clock and its recorded scores provide a concrete reference, but the absence of AMD data prevents any definitive statement about which chip is faster. The verdict, therefore, is that the Intel Core 7 253PE is the only option with demonstrated performance, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174’s capabilities are unknown from the database.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and Intel Core 7 253PE share several core specifications but differ in key areas. Both have 10 cores and 20 threads, with a dual-channel memory bus and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. Both also support ECC memory. The base clock differs, with the AMD part running at 2.00 GHz and the Intel part at 2.50 GHz. The boost clock also differs, with the AMD part reaching 5.00 GHz and the Intel part reaching 5.50 GHz. The thermal design power (TDP) shows a significant divergence: the AMD part has a TDP of 28, while the Intel part has a TDP of 65. The socket types are incompatible, with the AMD part using AMD Socket FP8 and the Intel part using Intel Socket 1700. The process node differs as well, with the AMD part built on a 4 nm process by TSMC and the Intel part built on a 10 nm process by Intel. The die size is recorded for the AMD part at 233 mm², while the Intel part has no die size listed. Memory support differs, with the AMD part supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. PCIe capabilities differ, with the AMD part offering Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and the Intel part offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ, with the AMD part using Radeon 880M and the Intel part using UHD Graphics 730. The market segment differs, with the AMD part classified as Mobile and the Intel part as Desktop. The release dates differ, with the AMD part released on 2026-02-28 and the Intel part released on 2026-03-08. The Intel part has a part number of SA4QE and a launch MSRP of $384, while the AMD part has no part number or launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The architectural differences between the two processors are rooted in their codenames, generations, and cache structures. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the codename Gorgon Point, with a generation labeled as Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). The Intel Core 7 253PE uses the codename Bartlett Lake, with a generation labeled as Core 7 (Bartlett Lake). The AMD part is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel part is built on a 10 nm process by Intel. The cache hierarchy shows a notable difference in L2 and L3 cache. Both parts have an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, but the L2 cache differs: the AMD part has 1 MB per core, while the Intel part has 2 MB per core. The L3 cache also differs significantly: the AMD part has 16 MB, while the Intel part has 33 MB shared. This means the Intel part has double the L2 cache per core and more than double the total L3 cache. The AMD part’s die size is recorded at 233 mm², while the Intel part has no die size data. The AMD part uses the Gorgon Point codename and is based on the Zen 5 and Zen 5c core architecture, which indicates a hybrid core design. The Intel part uses the Bartlett Lake codename, which is a separate architecture. The AMD part is designed for mobile platforms, while the Intel part is designed for desktop platforms, which aligns with their respective sockets and TDP ratings. The AMD part’s integrated graphics is Radeon 880M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. The PCIe generation differs, with the AMD part using Gen 4 and the Intel part using Gen 5. The memory support also differs, with the AMD part supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. These architectural differences indicate that the AMD part is optimized for efficiency in a mobile form factor, while the Intel part is oriented toward desktop performance with a larger cache and higher power envelope.