AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core 7 251TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts differ between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core 7 251TE?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads. This gives Intel a substantial advantage in raw parallel processing capacity.

Q: What are the maximum boost clocks for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 boosts up to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 251TE boosts up to 5.40 GHz. Intel holds a 0.40 GHz advantage in peak frequency.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is built on a 4 nm process, while the Intel Core 7 251TE uses a 10 nm process. This indicates a significant architectural difference in transistor density and power characteristics.

Q: What memory types are supported by each CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core 7 251TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both use a dual-channel memory bus with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the recorded performance percentile for each CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 sits at the 50th percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 251TE sits at the 88th percentile, placing it notably higher in the overall performance distribution.

Q: What integrated graphics are present on each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses Radeon 880M graphics. The Intel Core 7 251TE uses UHD Graphics 770.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core 7 251TE represent two fundamentally different design philosophies. AMD's chip uses a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c core arrangement under the Gorgon Point codename, while Intel's part relies on a uniform Bartlett Lake design. The AMD processor is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, whereas Intel uses a 10 nm process at its own foundry. Die sizes are close, with AMD at 233 mm² and Intel at 215 mm², but the underlying transistor density differs sharply due to the process node gap.

The core configuration is the most striking divergence. The Intel Core 7 251TE packs 24 cores and 32 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 offers 10 cores and 20 threads. This means Intel has more than double the physical cores and a 12-thread advantage in concurrent work. Cache hierarchies also differ: both allocate 80 KB of L1 per core, but Intel uses 1.25 MB of L2 per core versus AMD's 1 MB per core. The L3 cache is a major differentiator, Intel has 36 MB shared, while AMD has 16 MB total.

Clock speeds tell a complementary story. Intel boosts to 5.40 GHz, which is 0.40 GHz higher than AMD's 5.00 GHz peak. AMD's base clock is higher at 2.00 GHz versus Intel's 1.40 GHz, but sustained boost behavior depends on power delivery. The thermal design power differs significantly, AMD is rated at 28 W, Intel at 45 W. This reflects Intel's higher power envelope and AMD's efficiency-focused approach on the smaller 4 nm node.

Memory support reveals a platform split. AMD accepts DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel accepts DDR4 and DDR5. Both are dual-channel with identical 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported on both processors, making them suitable for reliability-oriented workloads. PCIe capabilities differ by generation: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, giving Intel a newer interface for storage and accelerators.

The integrated graphics differ as well. AMD pairs with Radeon 880M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. Socket compatibility is entirely separate: AMD uses Socket FP8, Intel uses Socket 1700. The market segments also diverge, with AMD targeting mobile and Intel targeting desktop. The launch dates show Intel released on 2025-01-12, while AMD follows on 2026-02-28.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data for the Intel Core 7 251TE provides a clear picture of its capabilities, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no recorded benchmark scores. This absence itself is informative: the database contains no direct measurements for the AMD part, so all quantitative comparisons must rely on Intel's recorded results and its position relative to nearby CPUs.

Intel's Cinebench results establish a strong multi-core baseline. The R15 multicore score is 2572, with a single-core score of 362. Moving to R20, Intel records 10717 multicore and 1512 single-core. The R23 test shows 25518 multicore and 3602 single-core. These numbers indicate robust scaling across workloads, with the multicore scores roughly seven times the single-core figures, consistent with the 24-core configuration.

Passmark results add further detail. The multithread score is 30022, and single-thread performance is recorded at 3568. Integer math reaches 125739, floating-point math hits 85607, and extended instructions score 16974. Data compression scores 334399, data encryption scores 22176, and random string sorting reaches 39643. Find prime numbers scores 140, while physics scores 1938.

The absence of AMD benchmark scores means the database cannot show a direct head-to-head victory for either side. However, the Intel part's percentile ranking places it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. This puts it well above the AMD part's 50th percentile. The nearest rivals to the Intel Core 7 251TE provide context. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H scores 41621, which is 0.1% lower. The Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 41576, 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41779, 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i7-14700T scores 41914, 0.6% higher. These deltas are small, indicating that the Core 7 251TE sits in a tightly contested performance band.

The average benchmark score for Intel is 41650. This figure aligns closely with its rival range, confirming that the Core 7 251TE delivers performance consistent with mainstream desktop processors in its class. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, meaning there is no recorded data to compare against Intel's established results.

Given the core count disparity, the data suggests Intel should dominate multi-threaded workloads. With 24 cores versus 10, and 32 threads versus 20, the Intel part has a structural advantage in parallel tasks. The 5.40 GHz boost clock also gives it an edge in single-threaded scenarios over AMD's 5.00 GHz. Even without direct benchmark comparisons, the recorded specifications and Intel's measured scores imply a wide margin in Intel's favor for most compute-heavy applications.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core 7 251TE holds the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 sits at the 50th percentile. This 38-point percentile gap is substantial and reflects the Intel part's stronger measured performance.

Users requiring high multi-core throughput should select the Intel Core 7 251TE. Its 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a 36 MB L3 cache and 5.40 GHz boost, deliver the recorded Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25518. The nearest rivals show this is competitive with processors like the Intel Core i7-14700T, which scores only 0.6% higher. The Intel part also provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, which is beneficial for modern storage devices.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 targets a different profile. Its 28 W TDP and 4 nm process indicate an efficiency-oriented design, likely suited for mobile or embedded systems where power consumption is a priority. The 10 cores and 20 threads provide adequate parallelism for moderate workloads, and the Radeon 880M integrated graphics may offer stronger GPU compute than Intel's UHD Graphics 770. However, the lack of benchmark data prevents any quantitative validation of these expectations.

For applications that depend on raw CPU throughput, whether in rendering, encoding, or scientific computation, the Intel part is the data-backed choice. Its measured scores and high percentile ranking confirm its capability. The AMD part remains an untested quantity in this database, and its lower core count and smaller cache suggest it cannot match Intel's multi-threaded performance.

The decision comes down to workload requirements. Data-intensive, parallel tasks favor the Intel Core 7 251TE. Power-constrained, embedded scenarios may favor the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174, but without benchmark results, that remains a speculative assessment. The database records only Intel's performance, and that performance is strong.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 | Intel Core 7 251TE |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 10 | 24 |

| Threads | 20 | 32 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2025-01-12 |

| Launch MSRP | None | $384 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 88 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 41650 |