AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core 7 160UL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database does not contain any head-to-head measurements directly comparing the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core 7 160UL. The recorded data for the Intel part, however, provides a full picture of its measured performance, while the AMD part carries no benchmark scores in the database at all. This absence of comparative data means the analysis must rely on the Intel Core 7 160UL's own benchmark results and the architectural specifications of both processors.

For the Intel Core 7 160UL, the recorded Cinebench results show a multicore score of 946 in Cinebench R15, 3942 in Cinebench R20, and 9386 in Cinebench R23. Single-core results measure 133, 556, and 1325 in the same respective tests. These scores place the Intel part at the 69th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 14232. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C at an average score of 14277, a difference of 0.3 percent behind; the Intel Core i5-10400F at 14185, a 0.3 percent advantage; the Intel Xeon 6756E at 14163, a 0.5 percent advantage; and the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U at 14320, a 0.6 percent deficit. The Intel Core 7 160UL sits within a narrow band of roughly one percent of all four rivals, indicating tightly grouped performance around the 14200 score level.

The Passmark suite for the Intel part shows a multithread score of 11043 and a single-thread score of 3391. In specific workloads, integer math reaches 47515, floating-point math reaches 25670, extended instructions score 5832, and data compression scores 108953. Data encryption measures 7146, random string sorting scores 11843, physics scores 819, and the find prime numbers test records 50. These figures indicate the Intel processor delivers its strongest relative results in data compression and integer-heavy tasks, while the prime number test is the weakest recorded workload.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark entries, the database cannot show any direct wins for either processor. The head-to-head section must therefore be limited to what the recorded data supports: the Intel part has a full benchmark profile, the AMD part does not. Any performance comparison between the two is not possible from the database measurements, and claims of superiority in either direction would lack recorded evidence.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database records no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50. In contrast, the Intel Core 7 160UL has 17 recorded benchmark scores and an average benchmark score of 14232.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 160UL compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Intel Core 7 160UL sits within 0.6 percent of all four nearest rivals. It is 0.3 percent ahead of the Intel Core i5-10400F and 0.5 percent ahead of the Intel Xeon 6756E. It trails the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C by 0.3 percent and the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U by 0.6 percent.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: Both processors have 10 cores. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 20 threads, while the Intel Core 7 160UL has 12 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core 7 160UL has a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 160UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 160UL does not.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design lineages. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename, belonging to the Core 7 generation based on Raptor Lake. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel.

The AMD part integrates a Radeon 880M graphics solution, while the Intel part integrates Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. Memory support also differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD processor has a memory bandwidth rating of 89.6 GB/s, while the database records no memory bandwidth figure for the Intel part. The AMD processor supports ECC memory, and the Intel processor does not.

Cache organization differs between the two. Both list 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache differs: AMD lists 1 MB per core, while Intel lists 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is 16 MB for AMD and 12 MB shared for Intel. The AMD processor uses a dual-channel memory bus, and the Intel processor also uses a dual-channel memory bus.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core 7 160UL uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes for the CPU, while the Intel part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes for the CPU. The AMD part is classified in the mobile market segment, while the Intel part is classified in the desktop market segment. Both processors are listed as active in production status, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The release dates differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a release date in 2026, while the Intel Core 7 160UL has a release date in 2024. The Intel part has a thermal design power of 15 watts, while the AMD part has a thermal design power of 28 watts.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 20 threads, while the Intel Core 7 160UL has 12 threads, despite both having 10 cores. The base clock differs: 2.00 GHz for AMD versus 1.80 GHz for Intel. The boost clock differs in the opposite direction: 5.00 GHz for AMD versus 5.20 GHz for Intel.

Thermal design power differs, with the AMD part rated at 28 watts and the Intel part at 15 watts. The socket is different: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700. The process node differs: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. The foundry differs: TSMC for AMD versus Intel for Intel. The die size is recorded for AMD at 233 mm², while no die size is recorded for Intel.

The L2 cache differs: 1 MB per core for AMD versus 1.25 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache differs: 16 MB for AMD versus 12 MB shared for Intel. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth. ECC memory support differs: AMD supports it, Intel does not. PCIe lane count differs: 16 lanes for AMD versus 8 lanes for Intel, both at Gen 4.

The integrated graphics differ: Radeon 880M for AMD versus Iris Xe Graphics 96EU for Intel. The market segment differs: mobile for AMD versus desktop for Intel. The release dates differ, with the AMD part dated later than the Intel part. The Intel part has a recorded average benchmark score of 14232 and a percentile of 69, while the AMD part has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile of 50.

Where Each One Wins

From the recorded data, the Intel Core 7 160UL is the only processor with measurable benchmark results. Its strongest recorded workloads are data compression at 108953, integer math at 47515, and floating-point math at 25670. The multithread score of 11043 and single-thread score of 3391 give it a balanced profile across the Passmark suite. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9386 and single-core score of 1325 represent its strongest Cinebench results. The Intel part sits at the 69th percentile among all CPUs, with an average score of 14232 that places it within 0.6 percent of four nearby rivals.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no recorded benchmark wins because the database contains no benchmarks for it. Its specifications indicate a higher thread count of 20 versus 12, a larger L3 cache of 16 MB versus 12 MB, a higher base clock of 2.00 GHz versus 1.80 GHz, a larger memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, ECC support, and more PCIe lanes at 16 versus 8. These are architectural advantages, not measured performance advantages. The database does not support any claim that the AMD part wins in any specific workload, because no workload results exist for it.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one clear conclusion: the Intel Core 7 160UL has a full set of benchmark measurements, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has none. The Intel part demonstrates a measured average benchmark score of 14232, ranking at the 69th percentile, with its closest competitor in the database being the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C at 14277, a 0.3 percent gap. The Intel part also shows a 0.3 percent advantage over the Intel Core i5-10400F and a 0.5 percent advantage over the Intel Xeon 6756E.

For users who require measured performance data, the Intel Core 7 160UL is the only option with recorded results. Its 12 threads, 15 watt thermal design power, and Raptor Lake architecture define a processor with a specific recorded performance envelope. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 offers a higher thread count, a larger L3 cache, ECC memory support, a higher memory bandwidth figure, and a newer manufacturing process, but none of these specifications translate into recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Choosing between the two depends entirely on whether measured results or architectural specifications carry more weight. The data shows the Intel part delivers documented performance across 17 benchmarks. The data shows the AMD part delivers no benchmarks at all. The database cannot confirm the AMD part outperforms the Intel part in any test, nor can it confirm the reverse. Based strictly on recorded measurements, the Intel Core 7 160UL is the processor with demonstrated performance, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 remains an unmeasured entry in the database.