AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core 7 150UL Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 7 150UL also has 10 cores but only 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock speed for both CPUs?

A: Both processors share the same maximum boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core 7 150UL uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Only the AMD processor supports ECC memory.

Q: How do the integrated graphics differ?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses a Radeon 880M, while the Intel Core 7 150UL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 16 MB of L3 cache, whereas the Intel Core 7 150UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies despite sharing a 10-core count. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 comes from the Gorgon Point generation, which is labeled as Ryzen AI Embedded with a Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid core arrangement. This marks a departure from uniform core designs, as the chip combines two different Zen 5 core types within a single package. The Intel Core 7 150UL, by contrast, is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS variant, which uses a more traditional homogeneous core layout.

Manufacturing processes separate the two clearly. AMD uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, while Intel employs a 10 nm process at its own foundry. This difference in node size has implications for power efficiency and transistor density, though the database does not record specific power efficiency measurements. The AMD chip also carries a larger die size of 233 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded.

Cache architecture shows notable divergence. Both processors allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core, and both use 1 MB of L2 per core, though the Intel part specifies 1.25 MB per core for L2. The L3 cache differs more substantially: AMD provides 16 MB while Intel provides 12 MB shared. This gives the AMD part a 4 MB advantage in the final level of cache before memory access.

Memory support separates the two further. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, making it compatible with low-power mobile memory. The Intel Core 7 150UL supports DDR4 and DDR5, which gives it backward compatibility with older memory technology. Only the AMD processor supports ECC memory, a feature often relevant for embedded and reliability-focused workloads. The AMD chip also has a higher recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part does not have a memory bandwidth figure recorded.

PCIe connectivity differs in lane count. The AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel processor provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. This doubling of PCIe lanes gives the AMD part more headroom for expansion devices, storage controllers, or accelerators.

The integrated graphics solutions come from different vendors entirely. AMD pairs the CPU with a Radeon 880M, while Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The database does not record direct graphics benchmark comparisons, so relative graphics performance cannot be quantified here.

Market positioning also differs. The AMD processor targets the mobile segment with an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor is listed as a desktop part using Intel Socket 1700. The Intel part was released on 2024-04-07, while the AMD part has a release date of 2026-02-28. Both processors are currently marked as active in production.

Where Each One Wins

The thread count difference creates a clear workload split. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 delivers 20 threads versus 12 threads on the Intel Core 7 150UL, giving it an 8-thread advantage. This suggests the AMD part should win in heavily threaded workloads such as compilation, rendering, virtualization, or any parallel compute task that can scale beyond 12 threads. The database records no direct benchmark scores for either chip, so this conclusion follows from the architectural specifications rather than measured performance.

The Intel Core 7 150UL counters with a lower 15 W TDP compared to the 28 W TDP of the AMD part. This gives Intel an advantage in power-constrained environments where heat dissipation and battery life matter more than raw throughput. The Intel chip also supports DDR4 memory, which could make it easier to integrate into existing systems that already use DDR4 modules.

The AMD processor wins on cache capacity with 16 MB of L3 versus 12 MB, which can benefit workloads with large working sets that fit within the cache hierarchy. The AMD part also provides double the PCIe lanes (16 versus 8), making it the better choice for systems needing more direct CPU-attached devices.

ECC memory support on the AMD side targets applications that require error correction, such as financial computing, medical systems, or data acquisition. The Intel part lacks this feature entirely. Memory bandwidth also favors AMD at 89.6 GB/s, though the Intel figure is not recorded for comparison.

The integrated graphics comparison is less clear. The Radeon 880M on the AMD side and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the Intel side have no recorded benchmark data in the database, so a definitive performance winner cannot be identified. The Intel part does have a desktop market segment, which may pair with discrete graphics more often.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two processors:

• Threads: AMD has 20, Intel has 12.
• Base clock: AMD starts at 2.00 GHz, Intel at 1.70 GHz.
• TDP: AMD is rated at 28 W, Intel at 15 W.
• Socket: AMD uses Socket FP8, Intel uses Socket 1700.
• Codename: AMD uses Gorgon Point, Intel uses Raptor Lake-PS.
• Generation: AMD is Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), Intel is Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS).
• Process node: AMD uses 4 nm, Intel uses 10 nm.
• Foundry: AMD uses TSMC, Intel uses its own fabs.
• Die size: AMD is 233 mm², Intel is not recorded.
• L2 cache per core: AMD lists 1 MB, Intel lists 1.25 MB.
• L3 cache: AMD has 16 MB, Intel has 12 MB shared.
• Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5.
• Memory bandwidth: AMD is 89.6 GB/s, Intel is not recorded.
• ECC memory: AMD supports it, Intel does not.
• PCIe lanes: AMD has 16 Gen 4 lanes, Intel has 8 Gen 4 lanes.
• Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon 880M, Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.
• Market segment: AMD is mobile, Intel is desktop.
• Release date: AMD is 2026-02-28, Intel is 2024-04-07.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark scores for either the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 or the Intel Core 7 150UL. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the wins counter shows zero for both processors. The average benchmark score for both is 0, and both sit at the 50th percentile against all CPUs in the database.

This absence of measured data means the comparison must rest on architectural specifications. The most significant numerical difference is the thread count: 20 threads versus 12 threads. In multi-threaded workloads that scale linearly, the AMD part could theoretically offer up to 66.7% more parallel throughput capacity, though real-world scaling depends on the specific application.

The base clock difference is modest. AMD starts at 2.00 GHz while Intel starts at 1.70 GHz, a 0.30 GHz gap. Both reach the same 5.00 GHz boost clock, meaning single-thread turbo performance could be similar, though sustained all-core boost behavior is not recorded.

The L3 cache gap of 4 MB favors AMD. For workloads that repeatedly access a dataset larger than 12 MB but smaller than 16 MB, the AMD processor would avoid some memory traffic that the Intel part would incur.

Memory bandwidth shows a recorded 89.6 GB/s for AMD, but Intel has no recorded figure, so a direct comparison cannot be made. The dual-channel memory bus is present on both processors.

The TDP difference of 13 W (28 W versus 15 W) is substantial. This indicates the Intel part is designed for lower sustained power draw, which may affect sustained performance in thermally limited chassis.

PCIe lane count doubles on the AMD side: 16 lanes versus 8 lanes. This affects how many NVMe drives, GPUs, or other PCIe devices can be connected directly to the CPU.

The release date gap of roughly 22 months puts the Intel part in an earlier generation, with the AMD part arriving later. Production status for both is active.

The Verdict

The data supports a split decision based on workload priorities. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 offers 20 threads, 16 MB of L3 cache, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, ECC support, 16 PCIe lanes, and a 4 nm process. These specifications point toward multi-threaded compute, embedded reliability, and higher memory throughput. The 28 W TDP indicates a willingness to spend more power for performance.

The Intel Core 7 150UL offers 12 threads, 12 MB of L3 cache, DDR4 and DDR5 support, and a 15 W TDP. Its advantages are lower power draw, backward memory compatibility, and an earlier release date. The desktop market segment and Socket 1700 compatibility may fit existing Intel desktop platforms.

For workloads that scale across threads, the AMD processor appears better suited. For power-sensitive embedded or mobile deployments where 15 W is a hard limit, the Intel processor is the safer selection. The lack of recorded benchmark scores means these conclusions derive from specification analysis, not measured performance. Both processors occupy the 50th percentile position in the database, indicating no recorded performance edge for either. The selection ultimately depends on whether the workload values parallel throughput and memory features or power economy and platform compatibility.