AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core 7 150U Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 versus the Intel Core 7 150U. The Intel part has a full set of recorded measurements, while the AMD processor has no benchmark scores listed at all. This asymmetry shapes the entire comparison: the Intel Core 7 150U can be placed against its nearest rivals, but the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 cannot be scored in any workload from the recorded data.

For the Intel Core 7 150U, the data shows a mixed profile across rendering, synthetic compute, and system-level tests. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 8883 and single-core score of 1875.5 indicate a processor that balances parallel throughput with strong per-thread performance. Cinebench R20 results follow the same pattern, with 5248 in multicore and 740 in single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test records 1505.5 in multicore and 254 in single-core. Geekbench scores of 6234 multicore and 1857 single-core reinforce the trend.

The PassMark suite adds detail. Integer math scores 51057, floating point math scores 34405, and extended instructions scores 8748. Data compression reaches 158622, while data encryption sits at 10025. Random string sorting records 18269, and find prime numbers scores just 58. The multithread score is 14700, with physics at 1012. Single-thread performance in PassMark is 3508.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Intel Core 7 150U sits near a tight cluster. The AMD Ryzen 5 4500 posts an average score of 17333, a delta of 0.4% from the Intel part. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 also shows 17321, again 0.4% away. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE records 17482, which is 0.5% above the Intel part, and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G scores 17507, 0.6% higher. These deltas are small, placing the Core 7 150U within a narrow band of comparable mobile and desktop processors. Its percentile rank of 71 among all CPUs in the database confirms it sits above the median performer, but the margin over its closest competition is thin.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its percentile rank of 50 is the only comparative signal, placing it at the median of all recorded CPUs, though without any direct measurements to verify that positioning.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply in internal design. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 150U uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-U, on Intel's 10 nm process.

Core counts match at 10 cores each, but thread counts differ. The AMD part supports 20 threads, while the Intel part supports 12. This means the AMD processor enables simultaneous multithreading across all 10 cores, while the Intel processor has fewer threads than cores, indicating a hybrid configuration where some cores do not add extra thread capacity. The AMD chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel chip starts lower at 1.80 GHz base but boosts higher to 5.40 GHz.

Cache hierarchies differ as well. Both share 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD processor has 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3. The Intel processor has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 12 MB of shared L3. The AMD part therefore carries more total L3, while the Intel part has a slightly larger per-core L2 allocation.

Memory support splits the field. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but no bandwidth figure is recorded. ECC memory is supported by the AMD part but not by the Intel part.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel processor provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes. Integrated graphics use different designs: the AMD part carries a Radeon 880M, and the Intel part uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units.

Package and socket details differ. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 1744. The AMD die size is recorded at 233 mm², while no die size is listed for the Intel part. The production status for both is active. The AMD release date is recorded as 2026-02-28, and the Intel release date is 2024-01-07.

Power envelopes are distinct. The AMD processor has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel processor runs at 15 watts. Neither part has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part number is recorded as SRMYP, while the AMD part number is listed as unknown.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174, the data cannot show any workload where it wins. The recorded wins tally reflects this: the AMD part has 0 wins, and the Intel part has 0 wins, because no head-to-head benchmarks exist.

For the Intel Core 7 150U, the available scores define its strengths. The Cinebench R23 multicore result of 8883 and Geekbench multicore result of 6234 suggest it handles multi-threaded rendering and compilation workloads competently. The PassMark multithread score of 14700 and integer math score of 51057 point to solid performance in CPU-bound tasks that scale across cores.

Single-thread performance is also strong. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1875.5 and Geekbench single-core score of 1857 indicate responsive per-thread execution, useful for applications that do not parallelize well. The PassMark single-thread score of 3508 confirms this pattern.

The data compression score of 158622 is notably high relative to other PassMark figures, suggesting the Intel part handles compression workloads efficiently. Data encryption at 10025 and extended instructions at 8748 show moderate capability in cryptography and SIMD-heavy code. Floating point math at 34405 and random string sorting at 18269 round out the compute profile.

The physics score of 1012 is comparatively low, and find prime numbers at 58 is the weakest result in the set. These low scores indicate that some specific workloads, particularly prime number sieving and physics simulation, do not benefit from this processor's design.

The AMD part's absence of scores means the database cannot assign it any wins. Its 50th percentile rank suggests median performance across all CPUs, but no workload-specific data supports a use-case claim. The comparison must remain one-sided: the Intel part has measured strengths in multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks, while the AMD part has no recorded evidence of either.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: Both have 10 cores. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports 20 threads, while the Intel Core 7 150U supports 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 boosts to 5.00 GHz. The AMD part has a higher base clock at 2.00 GHz compared to 1.80 GHz for the Intel part.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Core 7 150U supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 150U does not.

Q: What are the TDP values for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Core 7 150U has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 150U compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel part has an average benchmark score of 17395. The AMD Ryzen 5 4500 scores 17333 (0.4% lower), the AMD Ryzen 3 210 scores 17321 (0.4% lower), the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE scores 17482 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G scores 17507 (0.6% higher).

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 | Intel Core 7 150U |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 10 |

| Threads | 20 | 12 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.80 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-U |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 7 (Raptor Lake-U) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 16 MB | 12 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes | Gen 4, 8 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 880M | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |

| Release date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Part number | Unknown | SRMYP |

Both processors share 80 KB of L1 cache per core, dual-channel memory buses, unlocked multipliers set to false, active production status, and the mobile market segment.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear choice only for the Intel Core 7 150U, because it is the sole processor in this comparison with recorded benchmark results. The Intel part holds a percentile rank of 71 among all CPUs, with strong Cinebench R23 multicore (8883) and single-core (1875.5) scores, plus a PassMark multithread result of 14700. Its nearest rivals all sit within 0.6% of its average score, confirming it performs in a tightly competitive band.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 cannot be recommended on measured performance, as no benchmark data exists for it. Its percentile rank of 50 places it at the median, but without workload scores, that rank carries no evidentiary weight. The architecture does offer advantages on paper: more threads (20 versus 12), a smaller 4 nm process, larger L3 cache (16 MB versus 12 MB), ECC memory support, higher memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s), and more PCIe lanes (16 versus 8). These features matter for specific embedded and server-adjacent workloads, but the database does not record any test results to confirm their impact.

The Intel part wins on measured evidence. The AMD part wins on feature specifications alone. For any user choosing between these two based on the recorded data, the Intel Core 7 150U is the only option with demonstrated performance. The AMD part remains a specification sheet without experimental support.