AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core 5 330 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 330 is the only chip in this comparison with recorded benchmark scores in the database, which means all direct performance comparisons rely on the Intel side's measurements. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark entries in the database, so the head-to-head data is necessarily one-sided. The Intel Core 5 330 posts an average benchmark score of 18345, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its closest rivals are the Intel Core i3-14100 at 18318 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core 7 360 at 18374 (0.2% behind), the Intel Core i3-13100 at 18380 (0.2% behind), and the Intel Core 3 305 at 18302 (0.2% ahead). These delta values show the Core 5 330 sits in a tight cluster where the performance spread among the four nearest rivals is just 0.4 percentage points, indicating near-identical throughput in the database's aggregate workload.

Looking at the Cinebench results for the Intel Core 5 330, the multicore scores show a clear scaling pattern across versions. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it records 1325 points, while R20 multicore reaches 5523, and R23 multicore climbs to 13150. The single-core results follow a similar progression: 186 in R15, 779 in R20, and 1856 in R23. The ratio between R23 multicore and R23 single-core is roughly 7.1x, which is consistent with a 6-thread processor where the workload scales across the available logical processors. For comparison, the database's aggregate data shows the Core 5 330 delivers single-thread performance that places it among the upper-middle tier of mobile processors, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4088.

The PassMark suite provides a broader view of the Intel chip's capabilities. Integer math scores 33258, floating-point math reaches 43885, and extended instructions hit 12808. Data compression is particularly strong at 145287, while data encryption records 11076. The find prime numbers test is notably low at 114, and random string sorting posts 17771. The multithread score of 15471 and physics score of 1201 round out the workload profile. These numbers indicate the Core 5 330 excels in compression and encryption tasks, which are common in database and file-handling workloads, while prime-number finding is an outlier weakness that does not reflect typical office or media tasks.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark records, the database cannot produce a direct score comparison. The AMD chip's percentile ranking of 50 versus the Intel chip's 72 does suggest the Intel part sits higher in the overall distribution, but this percentile is derived from the AMD chip's lack of measured data rather than a computed score. The Intel Core 5 330's average benchmark score of 18345 is the only quantitative performance anchor available for this comparison.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing and design approaches. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses a 4 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². It is built on the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 5 330 uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by Intel itself, with the codename Wildcat Lake and the Core 5 generation designation. The process node difference is significant: Intel's 3 nm node is one step smaller than AMD's 4 nm node, which typically allows for higher transistor density and lower power draw at equivalent performance.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD chip provides 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel chip provides 6 cores and 6 threads. This means the AMD processor has hyperthreading or simultaneous multithreading, effectively doubling its thread count, whereas the Intel chip runs one thread per core. In heavily threaded workloads such as rendering, video encoding, or compilation, the AMD chip's 20 threads give it a structural advantage, though the Intel chip's higher percentile ranking in the database suggests its per-core efficiency compensates in lighter loads.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The AMD chip allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has 192 KB of L1 cache total, 2.5 MB of L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD design's per-core L2 allocation scales with core count, while Intel's L2 is a fixed pool. For workloads that fit within the 6 MB L3 of the Intel chip, the smaller cache may be sufficient, but the AMD chip's 16 MB L3 provides more headroom for larger working sets.

Memory architecture presents another clear divergence. The AMD chip supports dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip supports single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory types, but the AMD chip's dual-channel implementation delivers roughly 50% more theoretical bandwidth. This matters for memory-bound applications such as large database queries, image processing, or scientific simulations. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory, while the Intel chip does not, which makes the AMD part suitable for reliability-critical embedded or server-adjacent workloads.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes. The AMD chip's 16 lanes allow for more expansion options, such as multiple NVMe drives, discrete GPUs, or high-bandwidth I/O cards. The Intel chip's 6 lanes are more limited, suitable for basic storage and connectivity. Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD chip uses the Radeon 880M, while the Intel chip uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The database does not include graphics benchmark scores for either chip, so a direct GPU comparison is not possible from the recorded data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 5 330 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The AMD chip's thread count is more than triple the Intel chip's.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The AMD chip supports dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel chip supports single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s. The AMD chip's bandwidth is approximately 50% higher.

Q: Does either chip support ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 5 330 does not. This makes the AMD chip more suitable for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: What is the Intel Core 5 330's closest rival in the database?

A: The Intel Core 5 330's nearest rival is the Intel Core i3-14100, with an average score of 18318 and a delta of 0.1%. The Core 5 330 scores 18345, which is statistically indistinguishable from the i3-14100.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 330 perform in single-thread tests?

A: The Intel chip records a PassMark single-thread score of 4088 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1856. These numbers place it above the median CPU in the database, consistent with its 72nd percentile ranking.

Q: What are the process node differences?

A: The AMD chip uses a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel chip uses a 3 nm Intel process. The Intel node is one step smaller, which typically indicates a more advanced manufacturing process.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 | Intel Core 5 330 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 10 | 6 |

| Threads | 20 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Wildcat Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Supported | Not supported |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $309 |

The specification table highlights where the two chips diverge most clearly. The AMD chip has a higher core count, higher clocks, larger cache, dual-channel memory, ECC support, more PCIe lanes, and a higher TDP. The Intel chip has a smaller process node, lower TDP, and a recorded launch MSRP of $309. The AMD chip's 28 W TDP is nearly double the Intel chip's 15 W, which means the Intel part is more power-efficient in absolute terms, though the AMD chip's higher thread count and bandwidth may justify the extra power draw in performance-critical scenarios.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows two chips aimed at different priorities within the mobile and embedded market. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is built for throughput and expandability: 10 cores, 20 threads, 89.6 GB/s dual-channel memory bandwidth, 16 MB L3 cache, ECC support, and 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. Its 28 W TDP and 5.00 GHz boost clock indicate a processor that can handle demanding parallel workloads when power budget allows. The absence of benchmark scores for the AMD chip in the database means its measured performance cannot be ranked, but its specification profile suggests a workstation-class mobile processor.

The Intel Core 5 330 is a more modest part on paper: 6 cores, 6 threads, 59.7 GB/s single-channel bandwidth, 6 MB L3, and 6 PCIe lanes. Its 15 W TDP makes it suitable for fanless or low-power designs. The benchmark data confirms its competitive position: an average score of 18345 places it at the 72nd percentile, and its nearest rivals all sit within 0.2% of its score, indicating the Core 5 330 delivers consistent mid-range performance. The single-thread score of 4088 in PassMark and 1856 in Cinebench R23 suggest strong per-core efficiency, which benefits everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications.

For users whose workloads are heavily parallel, such as rendering, data analysis, or virtualization, the AMD chip's 20 threads and dual-channel memory provide a structural advantage. For power-sensitive designs or applications that prioritize single-thread speed and efficiency, the Intel chip's lower TDP and competitive benchmark scores make it a viable choice. The database shows the Intel part has a measurable performance profile, while the AMD part's specifications must be evaluated without benchmark confirmation. The choice between the two hinges on thread-count requirements, memory bandwidth needs, and power constraints, all of which the recorded specifications make clear.