AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core 5 320 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core 5 320. The AMD part has no recorded benchmark entries, while the Intel Core 5 320 carries an extensive set of measured scores. This asymmetry means the comparison must rely on the Intel part's absolute performance and its recorded position relative to other CPUs, alongside the architectural specifications of both processors.

For the Intel Core 5 320, the recorded data shows a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 6197 and a single-core score of 1926. The Cinebench R20 results are 5462 multi-core and 771 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 1054 multi-core and 276 single-core. These scores indicate a processor that sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 18023. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174, by contrast, has no benchmark scores recorded and is listed at the 50th percentile, which is the median position by default rather than a measured outcome.

The nearest rivals to the Intel Core 5 320, based on average benchmark scores, provide useful context. The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 scores 17994, which is 0.2 percent lower than the Intel part. The Intel Core 5 120U scores 17898, 0.7 percent lower. The Intel Core i5-1334U scores 18154, which is 0.7 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT scores 17891, also 0.7 percent lower. These deltas are small, placing the Intel Core 5 320 within a tight performance cluster where no single rival dominates by more than a fraction of a percent.

Within the Intel part's own benchmark suite, the Passmark results show a multi-thread score of 15450, a single-thread score of 4045, integer math at 32323, floating point math at 42440, and extended instructions at 13262. Data compression scores 148779, data encryption scores 10984, and random string sorting scores 18038. Physics processing scores 1221, and prime number finding scores 110. These figures establish the Intel Core 5 320 as a capable mobile processor, but without any corresponding AMD measurements, the head-to-head comparison remains incomplete. The recorded data cannot show which processor wins in direct competition, only that the Intel part has measurable performance and the AMD part does not yet have recorded results.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 320 wins in the domain of measured performance, as it is the only processor in this pairing with benchmark data. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 6197 and single-core score of 1926 place it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, which is a strong position for a 15 watt mobile part. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no measured wins because it has no benchmark entries, leaving its performance profile undefined in the database.

The AMD part wins on core and thread count. It offers 10 cores and 20 threads, compared to the Intel part's 6 cores and 6 threads. This structural advantage suggests that the AMD processor could handle heavily threaded workloads more effectively, though no benchmark data confirms this. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, which the Intel part does not, making it suited for reliability-focused embedded applications. The Intel part, meanwhile, has a higher recorded average benchmark score of 18023 versus the AMD part's 0, and a higher percentile ranking at 72 versus 50.

For single-threaded tasks, the Intel Core 5 320's recorded scores indicate solid performance, but the AMD part's higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz compared to 4.60 GHz for Intel suggests potential single-thread capability. Neither part has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not an option for either. The Intel part's measured physics score of 1221 and floating point math score of 42440 show reasonable compute throughput, but again, no AMD counterpart exists for direct comparison.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database shows no benchmark entries for the AMD part, while the Intel Core 5 320 has scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Passmark tests.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 320 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core 5 320 scores 0.7 percent higher than the Intel Core 5 120U and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT, 0.2 percent higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600, and 0.7 percent lower than the Intel Core i5-1334U.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 5 320 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 320 does not.

Q: What is the memory bus configuration for each processor?

A: The AMD part uses a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core 5 320 uses a 3 nm process from Intel.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 5 320 has 6 cores and 6 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 1.50 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.00 GHz for AMD and 4.60 GHz for Intel. Thermal design power is 28 watts for AMD and 15 watts for Intel. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1516.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD part lists 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part lists 192 KB of L1 cache total, 2.5 MB of L2 cache total, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD versus 59.7 GB/s for Intel. The AMD part supports ECC memory, the Intel part does not. PCIe lanes are 16 for AMD and 6 for Intel, both Gen 4.

Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses the Radeon 880M, while the Intel part uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The AMD die size is 233 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $340, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. Release dates are February 28, 2026 for AMD and April 15, 2026 for Intel. The Intel part number is SAE3H, while the AMD part number is unknown.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename with a Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 5 320 uses the Wildcat Lake codename with a Core 5 generation built on Wildcat Lake cores. The AMD part is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel part is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel. The AMD part uses dual-channel memory support for DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part uses single-channel memory support for the same memory types.

The AMD part's cache hierarchy is per-core for L1 and L2, with a 16 MB shared L3 pool. The Intel part uses a 192 KB L1 total, 2.5 MB L2 total, and 6 MB shared L3. The AMD part's 20 threads from 10 cores indicates simultaneous multithreading, while the Intel part's 6 threads from 6 cores indicates no hyperthreading. The AMD part has ECC memory support, a feature absent on the Intel part.

The integrated graphics solutions represent different architectural families. AMD uses the Radeon 880M, while Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe execution units. The AMD part has 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes available from the CPU, while the Intel part has only 6 lanes. The AMD part's higher TDP of 28 watts versus 15 watts for Intel suggests a larger power envelope for sustained performance, though the Intel part achieves its measured benchmark scores at the lower power limit. The AMD part's larger die size of 233 mm² reflects its additional cores, cache, and integrated graphics, while the Intel die size is not recorded.