AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core 3 201E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database record for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 contains no benchmark scores, while the Intel Core 3 201E has a complete set of measurements. The Intel part posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12613 and a single-core score of 1780. In Cinebench R20, it reaches 5297 multi-core and 747 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 1271 multi-core and 179 single-core. PassMark results for the Intel chip include 14839 in multithread, 3482 in single-thread, 43894 in integer math, 33260 in floating point math, and 164160 in data compression.

Because the AMD processor has no recorded scores in the database, direct head-to-head deltas cannot be computed. The Intel Core 3 201E sits at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 19056. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 19047 (0% delta), the Intel Core i5-12400F at 19039 (0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18982 (0.4% delta), and the AMD EPYC 7773X at 18979 (0.4% delta). This places the Core 3 201E in a tightly contested performance band, where 0.4% separates it from the closest competitors.

The lack of AMD data means the only quantifiable wins belong to the Intel processor. Its PassMark data compression score of 164160 indicates strong throughput in compression workloads. Data encryption reaches 8931, extended instructions hit 11035, and random string sorting finishes at 17783. Physics testing yields 1141, while the prime number search returns 57. The single-thread PassMark figure of 3482 matches the singlethread result of 3482, confirming consistency across the two listing formats.

The Intel chip's average benchmark score of 19056 is 9 points above the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, 17 points above the Core i5-12400F, 74 points above the Core i5-1335U, and 77 points above the EPYC 7773X. These margins are small enough to be considered statistical noise, yet the Core 3 201E holds the top position among its recorded rivals. The 73rd percentile ranking reflects a solid mid-to-upper tier placement across the entire database.

The Verdict

The data presents an asymmetric picture. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark entries, so its performance profile cannot be assessed from recorded measurements. The Intel Core 3 201E, by contrast, has a full suite of scores and a percentile ranking that places it above 73% of all CPUs in the database.

For users who require verifiable performance data, the Intel Core 3 201E is the only option with measurable results. Its average benchmark score of 19056 and its position among rivals like the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS and the Intel Core i5-12400F give it a clear, data-backed standing. The AMD part remains an unknown quantity in benchmark terms, despite its specifications suggesting a capable processor.

The Intel Core 3 201E targets the desktop segment with a 60 W TDP, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is a mobile part at 28 W TDP. This difference in thermal envelope aligns with their intended platforms: the Intel chip for desktop systems, the AMD chip for embedded and mobile applications. Users building a desktop system with a need for confirmed benchmark results should look at the Intel part, as its scores are fully documented. Users constrained to a mobile or embedded form factor would consider the AMD part, but must accept the absence of recorded performance data.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 201E wins in every category where measurements exist. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12613 and single-core score of 1780 establish a baseline across both threaded and single-threaded workloads. PassMark integer math at 43894 and floating point math at 33260 show strength in arithmetic-heavy tasks. Data compression at 164160 demonstrates efficiency in file and memory compression scenarios, while data encryption at 8931 and extended instructions at 11035 cover security and SIMD-style workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 cannot claim a benchmark win because no scores are recorded. However, its specification sheet shows 10 cores and 20 threads, compared to 4 cores and 8 threads for the Intel chip. The AMD part also lists a boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus 4.80 GHz for the Intel part, and a base clock of 2.00 GHz versus 3.60 GHz. These raw specifications suggest the AMD chip could excel in heavily threaded workloads, but the database contains no measurements to confirm this.

The Intel Core 3 201E uses a 10 nm process from Intel, while the AMD part uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The smaller process node for AMD could imply better power efficiency, but the recorded TDP of 28 W for AMD versus 60 W for Intel already indicates lower power draw for the mobile part. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth is listed at 76.8 GB/s for Intel and 89.6 GB/s for AMD, giving the AMD part a theoretical bandwidth advantage. PCIe support goes to Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the Intel side, while AMD lists Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

For desktop users, the Intel Core 3 201E offers documented performance across every major benchmark category. For embedded or mobile users, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 presents a lower TDP, higher core count, and faster boost clock, but no verified scores.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The record for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 contains an empty benchmarks array, so no performance measurements are available.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 3 201E?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E has an average benchmark score of 19056 and ranks at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core 3 201E compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E scores 19056, which is 0% above the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 19047, 0.1% above the Intel Core i5-12400F at 19039, 0.4% above the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18982, and 0.4% above the AMD EPYC 7773X at 18979.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is listed at 28 W. The Intel Core 3 201E is listed at 60 W.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core 3 201E has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 3 201E uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 generation. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 163 mm².

Cache layouts differ noticeably. The AMD part lists 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of L3. The Intel part also lists 80 KB of L1 per core but 1.25 MB of L2 per core, with 12 MB of shared L3. The AMD chip has a total of 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel chip has 4 cores and 8 threads. Both processors have locked multipliers.

Memory support separates the two as well. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core 3 201E supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD chip uses a Radeon 880M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730.

The AMD processor uses an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses an Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part is classified as mobile, and the Intel part is classified as desktop. Release dates place the Intel Core 3 201E in January 2025, with the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 following in February 2026. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $134. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Intel Core 3 201E has a part number of SRVTR and is actively in production. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 also lists an active production status. The AMD chip's base clock of 2.00 GHz is lower than the Intel chip's 3.60 GHz, but its boost clock of 5.00 GHz is higher than the Intel chip's 4.80 GHz. These architectural differences explain the positioning of each part: the AMD processor emphasizes core count, bandwidth, and power efficiency for embedded mobile workloads, while the Intel processor emphasizes higher base frequency, PCIe Gen 5 support, and desktop compatibility.