AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains a complete benchmark suite for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible for most tests. The Threadripper 9980X posts an average benchmark score of 321753, placing it in the 99th percentile of all CPUs. The P174 sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero, indicating that no performance measurements have been captured for it.

The Threadripper 9980X shows dominant multi-core performance in the Cinebench series. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it scores 13157 points. Its Cinebench R20 multicore result reaches 54822, and the R23 multicore test produces 130529 points. Single-core results are equally strong: 1857 in R15, 7739 in R20, and 18427 in R23. These figures demonstrate that the 9980X sustains high clocks across all 64 cores while retaining excellent single-threaded performance.

Passmark tests further quantify the 9980X's capabilities. The multithread score sits at 141641, while single-thread performance is recorded at 4537. Integer math reaches 872071, floating point math hits 559003, and extended instructions score 228959. Data compression completes at 2974534, data encryption at 157137, and random string sorting at 292083. The find prime numbers test produces 769, and physics scores 8001.

Without any benchmark entries for the P174, the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the Threadripper 9980X's recorded results. The data shows no wins for the P174 and no wins for the 9980X in the head-to-head benchmark field, because that field is empty. The database does not contain any direct comparison tests between these two processors.

The nearest rivals for the Threadripper 9980X provide context for its standing. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX scores 320749, which is 0.3% behind. The Intel Xeon 6781P scores 315524, trailing by 2%. The AMD EPYC 9575F scores 311774, 3.2% behind, and the AMD EPYC 9734 scores 310619, 3.6% behind. These margins show that the 9980X leads its closest competitors by small but consistent amounts across the average score metric.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their design targets. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It packs 10 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The thermal design power is 28 watts, reflecting its mobile and embedded focus.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X carries the Shimada Peak codename and belongs to the 9000 series, using the Zen 5 architecture exclusively. It contains 64 cores and 128 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The thermal design power reaches 350 watts, a figure consistent with a high-end desktop workstation part.

Both processors share the same 4 nm process node from TSMC, but their physical implementations differ sharply. The P174 has a die size of 233 mm², while the 9980X uses eight dies, each measuring 70.6 mm². The 9980X integrates 66,520 million transistors, a number not recorded for the P174. These physical differences reflect the 9980X's massively parallel design versus the P174's compact, power-efficient layout.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The P174 provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The 9980X offers 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantially larger 256 MB of L3 cache. The 9980X's larger L3 pool benefits workloads that repeatedly access large datasets, while the P174's per-core L1 allocation is higher.

Memory support differs as well. The P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory through a dual-channel bus, delivering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The 9980X supports DDR5 only but uses a quad-channel bus, achieving 204.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory, which is critical for embedded and workstation reliability.

PCIe connectivity separates the two clearly. The P174 provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The 9980X provides PCIe Gen 5 with 80 lanes, a substantial advantage for multi-GPU configurations, NVMe storage arrays, and high-bandwidth expansion cards. The 9980X also has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, while the P174 does not.

Integrated graphics exist only on the P174, which includes a Radeon 880M iGPU. The 9980X has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU for display output. The P174 targets the mobile and embedded market segment, while the 9980X targets desktop workstations. The 9980X launched on 2025-07-29 with a launch MSRP of $4999. The P174's release date is 2026-02-28.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X wins decisively in every recorded benchmark category, simply because the database contains no performance measurements for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174. The 9980X's 64 cores and 128 threads give it a massive advantage in heavily parallel workloads such as rendering, simulation, and data processing. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 130529 places it among the fastest workstation processors recorded.

The 9980X also wins on memory bandwidth. Its quad-channel DDR5 interface delivers 204.8 GB/s, more than double the P174's 89.6 GB/s. Workloads that stream large datasets, such as video editing, scientific computing, and database operations, benefit directly from this bandwidth advantage. The 9980X's 256 MB of L3 cache further reduces memory pressure for cache-resident workloads.

The P174 wins in situations where the 9980X cannot operate at all. Its 28-watt thermal design power suits fanless or low-power embedded systems, where the 9980X's 350-watt requirement would be impossible to satisfy. The P174's integrated Radeon 880M graphics enable display output without a discrete GPU, a feature the 9980X lacks entirely. The P174's support for LPDDR5X memory allows compact, low-power memory configurations.

The P174's PCIe Gen 4 interface with 16 lanes is sufficient for embedded applications that need modest I/O. Its dual-channel memory bus keeps the memory controller simple and power-efficient. For mobile workstations, ruggedized systems, or industrial controllers, the P174's feature set aligns with the constraints of those environments.

The 9980X's unlocked multiplier and 80 PCIe Gen 5 lanes make it the clear choice for high-end desktop workstations. Its 128 threads handle virtualization, compile farms, and batch processing with ease. The 9980X's 99th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its position at the top of the performance hierarchy, while the P174's 50th percentile reflects its mid-pack placement in the absence of recorded scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X has 64 cores and 128 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Threadripper 9980X has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the P174 boosts to 5.00 GHz.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare?

A: The P174 delivers 89.6 GB/s through a dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X interface. The 9980X delivers 204.8 GB/s through a quad-channel DDR5 interface.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the P174 and the 9980X support ECC memory.

Q: What is the launch date for each processor?

A: The Threadripper 9980X launched on 2025-07-29. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 launched on 2026-02-28.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The P174 includes a Radeon 880M integrated GPU. The 9980X has no integrated graphics.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification. The P174 uses the AMD Socket FP8, while the 9980X uses AMD Socket sTR5. The P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads, the 9980X has 64 cores and 128 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the P174 and 3.20 GHz for the 9980X. Boost clocks are 5.00 GHz and 5.40 GHz, respectively.

Thermal design power measures 28 watts for the P174 and 350 watts for the 9980X. The P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename with a Zen 5 and Zen 5c generation mix. The 9980X uses the Shimada Peak codename with pure Zen 5 architecture. Both use TSMC's 4 nm process, but the P174 has a single 233 mm² die, while the 9980X uses eight 70.6 mm² dies. Transistor count is recorded only for the 9980X at 66,520 million.

L1 cache is 80 KB per core on the P174 and 64 KB per core on the 9980X. L2 cache is 1 MB per core on both. L3 cache totals 16 MB on the P174 and 256 MB on the 9980X. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X on the P174, but only DDR5 on the 9980X. Memory bus width is dual-channel on the P174 and quad-channel on the 9980X. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s versus 204.8 GB/s.

PCIe capability differs by generation and lane count. The P174 offers PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the 9980X offers PCIe Gen 5 with 80 lanes. Integrated graphics are present on the P174 as a Radeon 880M, absent on the 9980X. Market segments are Mobile for the P174 and Desktop for the 9980X. The multiplier is locked on the P174 and unlocked on the 9980X. Release dates are 2026-02-28 for the P174 and 2025-07-29 for the 9980X. The 9980X has a launch MSRP of $4999 and part number 100-000001593, while the P174 has no recorded MSRP or part number.