AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains benchmark results for the Intel Core 5 213PE, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no benchmark entries in the database. This means the head-to-head comparison is one-sided, with the Intel part holding all measured scores.

The Intel Core 5 213PE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22468 and a single-core score of 3172. For comparison, the R20 run shows 9436 multi-core and 1332 single-core, while R15 shows 2264 multi-core and 319 single-core. These results place the Intel part at the 85th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 35428.

PassMark results for the Intel Core 5 213PE show a multi-thread score of 26434 and a single-thread score of 4060. Integer math scores 92089, floating point math scores 68587, and extended instructions score 19565. Data compression reaches 298804, while data encryption scores 15916. Find prime numbers scores 114, physics scores 1624, and random string sorting scores 32027.

The AMD part sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded average benchmark score, indicating an absence of measured performance data rather than a competitive result. The database shows zero head-to-head benchmark entries and zero wins for either side, so the quantitative comparison relies entirely on the Intel measurements.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i boosts to 5.00 GHz. The Intel part holds a 0.20 GHz advantage in maximum clock speed.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: Both processors use 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i and the Intel Core 5 213PE are identical in this specification.

Q: How does the cache configuration differ between the two?

A: Both use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 2 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, giving it a larger total cache footprint.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i supports 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the Intel Core 5 213PE supports 76.8 GB/s. The AMD part offers 12.8 GB/s more bandwidth.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD part is built on the smaller node.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core 5 213PE?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PE wins in every measured benchmark category because it is the only part with recorded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22468 and single-core score of 3172 establish a baseline for rendering workloads. PassMark integer math at 92089 and floating point math at 68587 indicate strength in computational tasks. Data compression at 298804 and encryption at 15916 show capability in data processing scenarios.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i wins in the specifications where it holds an advantage. It supports 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth versus 76.8 GB/s for Intel, which can benefit memory-intensive workloads. Its 4 nm process node from TSMC is denser than Intel's 10 nm node, potentially improving power efficiency per unit of work. The integrated Radeon 880M graphics may offer different graphics capabilities compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 730, though no benchmark data confirms this.

For users prioritizing measured performance, the Intel Core 5 213PE is the only option with data. For users prioritizing memory bandwidth or a smaller process node, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has the specification advantage. The Intel part also carries a higher TDP of 65 versus 28 for AMD, which may affect thermal requirements in constrained systems.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. Base clock: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i runs at 2.00 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 213PE runs at 2.70 GHz. Boost clock: AMD reaches 5.00 GHz, Intel reaches 5.20 GHz. TDP: AMD is rated at 28, Intel at 65. Socket: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. Process node: AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC, Intel uses 10 nm from Intel. Die size: AMD measures 233 mm², Intel has no recorded die size.

Cache: AMD has 1 MB L2 per core and 8 MB L3, Intel has 2 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth: AMD at 89.6 GB/s, Intel at 76.8 GB/s. PCIe: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon 880M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. Market segment: AMD is Mobile, Intel is Desktop. Part number: AMD is unknown, Intel is SA4QG.

Both support ECC memory, dual-channel memory buses, and have locked multipliers. Both have 8 cores, 16 threads, and 80 KB L1 per core. Both are in active production and share the same release date of 2026-03-08T17:00:00.000Z.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses the Gorgon Point codename with a Ryzen AI Embedded generation based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename with a Core 5 generation based on Bartlett Lake architecture. These are distinct architectural families from different manufacturers.

The AMD part is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while Intel builds the Core 5 213PE on a 10 nm process at Intel. The smaller node typically allows for higher transistor density, and the AMD die measures 233 mm². The Intel die size is not recorded. Cache architecture differs as well: AMD uses a per-core L2 layout of 1 MB and an 8 MB L3, while Intel uses a per-core L2 layout of 2 MB and a 24 MB shared L3.

PCIe capability differs, with AMD offering Gen 4 across 16 lanes and Intel offering Gen 5 across 16 lanes. Memory support also splits, as AMD accepts DDR5 and LPDDR5X while Intel accepts DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD integrated Radeon 880M and Intel UHD Graphics 730 represent different graphics architectures. The AMD processor targets the mobile market segment, while the Intel processor targets desktop systems. The Intel part has a recorded part number of SA4QG, while the AMD part number is unknown. Both processors are currently in active production status.