AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Gorgon Point
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 213PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
327,891
298,804
passmark_data_encryption
16,055
15,916
passmark_extended_instructions
24,193
19,565
passmark_find_prime_numbers
71
114
passmark_floating_point_math
55,799
68,587
passmark_integer_math
87,940
92,089
passmark_multithread
25,889
26,434
passmark_physics
1,210
1,624
passmark_random_string_sorting
34,801
32,027
passmark_single_thread
4,029
4,060
passmark_singlethread
4,029
4,060
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,264
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
319
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
9,436
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,332
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
22,468
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,172

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 vs Intel Core 5 213PE

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 and Intel Core 5 213PE are both 8-core, 16-thread processors with ECC memory support and locked multipliers, but they target different platforms. The AMD part is a 28 W mobile chip on AMD Socket FP8, built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the Intel part is a 65 W desktop chip on Intel Socket 1700, built on Intel's 10 nm process. Both are listed as Active with a release date of 2026-03-08. In the database, the AMD processor records a 91st percentile rank and an average benchmark score of 52901, while the Intel processor records an 85th percentile rank and an average benchmark score of 35428.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head PassMark data covers 11 tests. The Intel Core 5 213PE wins 7, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 wins 4. AMD's biggest win is extended instructions, where it scores 24193 against 19565, a 23.7 percent advantage. It also wins data compression 327891 to 298804, a 9.7 percent margin, and random string sorting 34801 to 32027, an 8.7 percent margin. The narrowest AMD win is data encryption, 16055 to 15916, a 0.9 percent edge.

Intel's biggest win is find prime numbers, 114 versus 71, a 37.7 percent gap. The Intel part also leads in physics, 1624 to 1210, a 25.5 percent margin, and floating-point math, 68587 to 55799, an 18.6 percent margin. In integer math, Intel wins 92089 to 87940, a 4.5 percent margin. The multithread test goes to Intel 26434 to 25889, a 2.1 percent margin. The single-thread and singlethread entries both record 4060 for Intel and 4029 for AMD, a 0.8 percent gap.

The workload pattern follows those margins. Intel dominates math, physics, and multithread workloads, while AMD dominates compression, encryption, extended instructions, and sorting. The multithread gap is modest at 2.1 percent, and the single-thread gap is only 0.8 percent. The larger deltas are workload-specific rather than universal.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the same core and thread count, but the underlying designs diverge. AMD uses the Gorgon Point die with a Zen 5 / Zen 5c generation label, while Intel uses the Bartlett Lake die with a Core 5 generation label. AMD's process node is 4 nm at TSMC, and its die size is 233 mm². Intel's process node is 10 nm at Intel, and no die size is recorded in the database.

Cache layouts differ. Both have 80 KB L1 per core. AMD has 1 MB L2 per core and 8 MB L3. Intel has 2 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3. The Intel part therefore carries more L2 and L3 capacity.

Memory support also differs. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory and ECC support. AMD's memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s, compared with 76.8 GB/s for Intel. PCIe connectivity differs by generation: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU-only lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well. AMD includes Radeon 880M graphics, while Intel includes UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part targets the mobile segment on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part targets the desktop segment on Intel Socket 1700. The power envelopes reflect that split: AMD has a 28 W TDP, Intel has a 65 W TDP. Clock speeds also differ, with AMD at 2.00 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost, and Intel at 2.70 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost. Both are locked multipliers and both are Active.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more of the recorded head-to-head tests?

A: Intel wins 7 of the 11 tests, while AMD wins 4. Intel's wins include multithread, single-thread, integer math, floating-point math, physics, and prime-number finding. AMD's wins are data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, and random string sorting.

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score and percentile rank?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 records 52901 and sits at the 91st percentile. The Intel Core 5 213PE records 35428 and sits at the 85th percentile. AMD's nearest rivals are the Ryzen 5 9500F (52873, +0.1), Xeon 634 (52974, -0.1), EPYC 7313P (53206, -0.6), and Ryzen 9 7900X (53288, -0.7). Intel's nearest rivals are the Core i7-13700T (35403, +0.1), Core i7-12700KF (35365, +0.2), Core i5-13600T (35305, +0.3), and Core i7-12700K (35287, +0.4).

Q: Which processor has more L2 and L3 cache?

A: Intel. It has 2 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3, while AMD has 1 MB L2 per core and 8 MB L3. Both have 80 KB L1 per core.

Q: What memory types do the two processors support?

A: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both support ECC memory and dual-channel operation. AMD's memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s, and Intel's is 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What PCIe connectivity does each processor provide?

A: Both provide 16 CPU-only lanes. AMD uses PCIe Gen 4, while Intel uses PCIe Gen 5.

Q: Which processor has the higher clock speeds?

A: Intel has a 2.70 GHz base clock and 5.20 GHz boost clock. AMD has a 2.00 GHz base clock and 5.00 GHz boost clock. Intel also has a higher TDP at 65 W, compared with AMD's 28 W.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 | Intel Core 5 213PE |

|---|---|---|

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | not recorded |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 8 MB | 24 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Part number | unknown | SA4QG |

| Launch MSRP | none recorded | $221 |

The Verdict

The recorded data separates the two processors by workload profile rather than by a single overall winner. The Intel Core 5 213PE wins 7 of 11 head-to-head tests, with the largest margins in prime-number finding, physics, and floating-point math. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 wins the other 4, led by a 23.7 percent extended-instruction advantage, and it holds the higher average benchmark score at 52901 versus 35428, as well as the higher percentile rank at 91 versus 85.

The nearest-rival data reinforces that split. AMD's average score sits close to the Ryzen 9 7900X at 53288 with a delta of -0.7 and the EPYC 7313P at 53206 with a delta of -0.6. Intel's average score sits close to the Core i7-12700K at 35287 with a delta of 0.4 and the Core i7-13700T at 35403 with a delta of 0.1.

For workloads that rely on extended instruction throughput, data compression, encryption, and random string sorting, the AMD part delivers the better recorded results. For workloads that rely on prime-number generation, physics, floating-point math, integer math, and multithread throughput, the Intel part delivers the better recorded results. The AMD part also fits a 28 W mobile platform with Radeon 880M graphics, while the Intel part fits a 65 W desktop platform with Gen5 PCIe, DDR4 compatibility, and more cache. The choice follows the workload and platform target.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI Embedded P164
5 213PE
Core Specs
Cores
8
8 0.0%
Threads
16
16 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.7 +35.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.7 +35.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Multiplier
20
27 +35.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
8 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
65 +132.1%
PL1
65 W
PL2
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
Architecture
Codename
Gorgon Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
233 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
3 + 5
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 880M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$221
Part Number
unknown
SA4QG
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
105°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI Embedded P164 Details View Core 5 213PE Details