AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits these two processors across very different use cases. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile part built for efficiency and embedded deployment, while the Intel Core 5 213PE is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor with a 65 W TDP and a strong benchmark footprint. The Intel part holds every recorded benchmark win in the database, which makes the use-case split straightforward: the Intel Core 5 213PE dominates in raw compute, while the AMD part competes on platform characteristics rather than performance scores.

The Intel Core 5 213PE sits at the 85th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 35428. That places it in the upper tier of desktop processors. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has a 50th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of 0, meaning no benchmark results are recorded for it in the database. Because of this, the Intel part wins every measurable workload category, from single-threaded tasks to multithreaded rendering, encryption, and physics simulation.

The use-case split is therefore not about which CPU wins which benchmark, but about what each platform is designed to do. The AMD part uses a 28 W TDP and is an active mobile embedded processor, which makes it suitable for fanless or low-power industrial systems where thermals and power draw matter more than peak throughput. The Intel part, with its 65 W TDP and desktop socket, targets conventional desktop workloads where performance is the priority and power consumption is a secondary concern.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and use fundamentally different silicon. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry.

Core counts differ: the AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel processor also runs higher clocks, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, compared to the AMD part's 2.00 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost. Cache layouts also diverge. Both share an 80 KB L1 per core, but the AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and only 4 MB of L3, while the Intel part has 2 MB of L2 per core and a much larger 24 MB shared L3 cache.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 over dual-channel memory, but its recorded memory bandwidth is lower at 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities also split the pair: the AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ. The AMD part uses a Radeon 840M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD processor is a mobile-market part on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor is a desktop-market part on Intel Socket 1700. The Intel part has a known part number, SA4QG, and a launch MSRP of $221, while the AMD part has no recorded part number or launch MSRP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two processors, and the AMD part has no recorded benchmark scores at all. The Intel Core 5 213PE, however, has a full set of benchmark results that define its performance profile. In Cinebench R15, the Intel part scores 2264 in multicore and 319 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 9436 multicore and 1332 single-core. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22468 multicore and 3172 single-core.

PassMark results for the Intel part cover a wide range of workloads. Data compression scores 298804, data encryption scores 15916, and extended instructions score 19565. Floating point math scores 68587, integer math scores 92089, and the find prime numbers test scores 114. The multithread score is 26434, physics scores 1624, and random string sorting scores 32027. Single-thread performance is recorded twice, at 4060 in both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread.

The Intel part's nearest rivals in the database are all Intel desktop chips. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700T, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700KF, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600T, and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700K. These deltas are narrow, which indicates the Core 5 213PE sits in a dense performance cluster where small score differences separate adjacent parts.

Because the AMD part has no benchmark scores in the database, no direct numerical comparison between the two is possible. The data shows the Intel processor as the only one with measurable performance, and its average benchmark score of 35428 places it well above the AMD part's recorded average of 0, which reflects missing data rather than actual performance.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmarks for the AMD part, and its average benchmark score is 0.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 213PE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700T, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700KF, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600T, and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700K.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?

A: The AMD part records 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part records 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part supports PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What is the Intel Core 5 213PE's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is $221.

The Verdict

The Intel Core 5 213PE is the only processor in this comparison with recorded performance data, so it is the clear choice for any workload that depends on compute throughput. Its 8 cores, 16 threads, 5.20 GHz boost clock, and 24 MB shared L3 cache give it a strong profile for multithreaded rendering, simulation, and content creation. Its benchmark scores, particularly the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 22468 and the PassMark multithread score of 26434, indicate a capable desktop processor that sits near the top of its performance cluster.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i cannot be evaluated on performance from the database because no scores are recorded. What the data does show is a low-power mobile embedded processor with a 28 W TDP, 4 nm TSMC fabrication, and support for LPDDR5X memory. These characteristics point toward embedded and industrial applications where power efficiency, platform integration, and memory flexibility matter more than raw benchmark numbers. Its 50th percentile ranking reflects the absence of data, not a measured performance level.

For a desktop builder looking at the Intel Core 5 213PE, the data shows a processor that matches or slightly exceeds several established Intel desktop parts. For anyone evaluating the AMD part, the database offers no performance evidence, so the decision must rest on platform fit rather than measured results.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i | Intel Core 5 213PE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 4 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production status | Active | Active |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $221 |

| Part number | Unknown | SA4QG |

| Multiplier unlocked | No | No |

| Percentile vs all CPUs | 50 | 85 |

| Average benchmark score | 0 | 35428 |