AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i vs Intel Core i5-14600 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Core i5-14600 is extensive, with 19 benchmark scores spanning Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i, however, has no benchmark scores listed in the database. This immediately establishes a one-sided comparison: every measurable performance metric originates from the Intel processor.

The Intel Core i5-14600 posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and a single-core score of 4300. In Cinebench R20, it scores 12794 multi-core and 1806 single-core. The older R15 test shows 3070 multi-core and 433 single-core. Geekbench results indicate 14680 multi-core and 2424 single-core performance.

Passmark testing breaks down into specialized workloads. The multi-thread score reaches 35848, while single-thread performance sits at 4167. Integer math scores 117078, floating-point math 85759, and extended instructions 25674. Data encryption processes at 25082, data compression at 434620, and random string sorting at 48043. The physics test returns 2330, and prime number finding returns 155.

Since the AMD processor has no recorded scores, the database shows zero benchmark wins for the Ryzen AI Embedded P132i and 19 wins for the Intel Core i5-14600. The comparison is not a contest of close margins; it is a complete absence of data for one participant.

The Intel Core i5-14600 holds an average benchmark score of 44889. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i9-12900KS with an average score of 45094, which is 0.5% higher, and the AMD EPYC 4344P at 45122, also 0.5% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D trails by 0.7% with an average score of 44573, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H sits 1% behind at 44466. The Core i5-14600 sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P132i sits in the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14600 wins every benchmark category where data exists. It delivers strong multi-core results in Cinebench R23, R20, and R15, indicating solid sustained throughput across all 14 cores and 20 threads. The single-core scores in Cinebench and Geekbench confirm that the processor also handles lightly threaded workloads effectively.

Passmark results reveal specific strengths. The data compression score of 434620 shows a high throughput for archival and file-handling tasks. Integer math at 117078 and floating-point math at 85759 both point to capable number-crunching for scientific or financial workloads. The extended instructions score of 25674 suggests solid SIMD and vector processing capability. Random string sorting at 48043 reflects sorting and database-style operations. The encryption score of 25082 indicates moderate cryptographic throughput. The physics test result of 2330 and prime number finding at 155 complete the picture of a balanced desktop processor.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has no wins to claim. Without benchmark data, the database cannot assign it any performance strengths. Its 50th percentile ranking versus all CPUs is based on an average benchmark score of 0, which means it cannot be compared to the Intel processor on any measured workload. The Intel Core i5-14600, in contrast, sits at the 89th percentile, placing it well above the majority of CPUs in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is 0.5% behind the Intel Core i9-12900KS (45094) and the AMD EPYC 4344P (45122), and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573) and 1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466).

Q: What is the fastest single-core score recorded for the Intel Core i5-14600?

A: The highest single-core result is 4300 in Cinebench R23, followed by 1806 in Cinebench R20, 433 in Cinebench R15, 2424 in Geekbench, and 4167 in Passmark single-thread tests.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i have any benchmark data?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark scores for the AMD processor, which places it in the 50th percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 0.

Q: What is the multi-core performance of the Intel Core i5-14600?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 30464, R20 is 12794, R15 is 3070, and Geekbench multi-core is 14680. Passmark multi-thread scores 35848.

Q: Which processor has a higher launch MSRP?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has a launch MSRP of $255. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ substantially in core configuration. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14600 has 14 cores and 20 threads. Clock speeds also diverge: the AMD processor has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, whereas the Intel processor runs at 2.70 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost.

Power consumption differs by a wide margin. The AMD processor has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 65 watts. The sockets are incompatible: the AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700.

Memory support overlaps only partially. Both support DDR5, but the AMD processor also supports LPDDR5X, and the Intel processor also supports DDR4. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD processor has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor has no memory bandwidth figure listed. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation and lane count. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD processor uses Radeon 840M, and the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 770.

The Intel processor has a known part number, SRN44, while the AMD processor is listed as unknown. The Intel processor has a die size of 257 mm², while the AMD processor has no die size recorded. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel Core i5-14600 has a launch MSRP of $255; the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has no launch MSRP listed.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, which is based on Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process node at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen generation. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process node at Intel.

Cache hierarchies differ. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD processor has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The L3 cache difference is significant: 24 MB shared versus 4 MB, which affects how much data can be held close to the cores.

The market segments differ. The AMD processor targets mobile devices, while the Intel processor targets desktops. Both are listed as Active in production status. The release dates differ by more than two years: the Intel processor was released on January 7, 2024, and the AMD processor was released on March 8, 2026.

Memory controller capabilities also differ. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a measured bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 with no bandwidth figure recorded. Both support ECC memory, which matters for error-sensitive workloads.

The PCIe implementation differs in both generation and lane count, with the Intel processor supporting PCIe Gen 5 at 16 lanes versus Gen 4 at 14 lanes for the AMD processor. This affects available I/O bandwidth for add-in cards and storage devices.

The Verdict

The database contains no benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i, so any performance comparison must rely entirely on the Intel Core i5-14600 measurements. The Intel processor delivers strong multi-core and single-core results across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark. Its 89th percentile ranking places it well above the median CPU in the database, and its average score of 44889 aligns closely with the Intel Core i9-12900KS and AMD EPYC 4344P.

The AMD processor occupies the 50th percentile with an average score of 0. This does not necessarily indicate poor real-world performance; it simply means the database has no recorded measurements for this product. The 28-watt TDP and mobile market segment suggest a different design target than the 65-watt desktop Intel processor. The AMD processor uses a 4 nm process node, which is smaller than the 10 nm node used by the Intel processor, and it supports LPDDR5X memory, which is useful for power-constrained mobile systems.

The Intel Core i5-14600 is the only processor here with measurable performance data. Users selecting between these two parts would be choosing between a desktop processor with a full suite of benchmark results and a mobile processor with no recorded scores. The choice depends on the platform: the Intel processor fits Socket 1700 desktop builds, and the AMD processor fits Socket FP8 mobile designs. The data does not support a direct performance comparison, so the verdict from the recorded information is that the Intel Core i5-14600 delivers verified performance across all tested workloads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i remains unmeasured in the database.