AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data positions the Intel Core i7-14701TE as the clear performance leader between these two processors. The Intel part holds the 78th percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i sits at the 50th percentile with no benchmark scores recorded. The Intel chip delivers a substantial multicore advantage across every Cinebench iteration, with an R23 multicore score of 17035 against an unrecorded AMD result. The Intel processor also brings 16 threads versus 12 for the AMD, an 8-core design against a 6-core design, and a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz compared to 4.50 GHz. For workloads that depend on sustained multithreaded throughput, the database clearly favors the Intel part. The AMD embedded processor, by contrast, offers a lower 28 W TDP against Intel's 45 W, a 4 nm process from TSMC versus Intel's 10 nm node, and a more compact socket footprint. The data suggests the AMD part suits power-constrained embedded deployments, while the Intel chip targets desktop-class performance where thermal headroom permits a higher power envelope.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process node. The Intel Core i7-14701TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size.

Core configurations differ meaningfully. The AMD part provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part provides 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are close, with AMD at 2.00 GHz and Intel at 2.10 GHz, but boost clocks separate them: 4.50 GHz for AMD and 5.20 GHz for Intel. The Intel chip also has a larger L3 cache at 33 MB shared, compared to AMD's 4 MB L3. Both use 80 KB of L1 per core, but Intel doubles the L2 at 2 MB per core versus 1 MB per core for AMD.

Memory support overlaps but differs in scope. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, though no bandwidth figure appears in the database. Both processors support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities favor Intel, which offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The AMD part is classified as a mobile segment processor on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part is a desktop segment processor on Intel Socket 1700. The Intel processor was released in mid-2024, while the AMD processor carries a 2026 release date. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no shared benchmark results between the two processors, so all comparisons rely on the Intel chip's recorded scores and the AMD chip's absence of recorded scores. The Intel Core i7-14701TE shows strong multicore performance across Cinebench releases. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it scores 1716; in R20 multicore, 7154; and in R23 multicore, 17035. Single-core results scale similarly: 242 in R15, 1010 in R20, and 2405 in R23. PassMark results reinforce the Intel chip's throughput profile: multithread score of 20042, integer math at 65792, floating-point math at 50219, and extended instructions at 14354. Data compression reaches 220520, data encryption sits at 11699, and random string sorting hits 22760. Physics processing records 1860, while find prime numbers logs 143. The single-thread PassMark score is 2637.

Because the AMD processor has no benchmark entries, the recorded data cannot quantify its performance in these same tests. The database's percentile figures provide the only comparative signal: Intel at the 78th percentile versus AMD at the 50th percentile. The Intel chip's average benchmark score is 26013. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 with an average score of 25981 and a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS at 26106 with a delta of -0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE at 25880 with a delta of 0.5%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U at 26187 with a delta of -0.7%. These close deltas indicate the Intel part trades blows with a cluster of AMD mobile and desktop chips, sitting within a 1% band of all four rivals.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How do their boost clocks compare?

A: The Intel part boosts to 5.20 GHz, which is 0.70 GHz higher than the AMD part's 4.50 GHz boost clock.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has a TDP of 28 W, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE has a TDP of 45 W, a 17 W difference in favor of AMD.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, significantly more than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i's 4 MB L3.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses and support ECC memory.

Q: How does the Intel chip compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has an average score of 26013. It sits 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 0.5% above the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE, 0.4% below the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS, and 0.7% below the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14701TE wins every measurable performance category in the database. Its multicore Cinebench results, from R15 through R23, show a processor built for sustained threaded workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 20042 and integer math score of 65792 point to strong general-purpose compute. The encryption score of 11699 and extended instructions score of 14354 suggest the Intel part handles security and vectorized workloads effectively. The single-thread PassMark score of 2637, paired with an R23 single-core score of 2405, gives it an edge in lightly threaded applications as well. Its 78th percentile standing among all CPUs confirms that it ranks well above the median processor in the database.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i wins on efficiency and platform characteristics. Its 28 W TDP is substantially lower than Intel's 45 W, which matters for embedded systems with limited cooling or battery budgets. The 4 nm TSMC process node gives it a manufacturing advantage over Intel's 10 nm node, potentially translating into better power efficiency per operation, though the database records no direct efficiency benchmark. The AMD part's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is a recorded figure, giving it a concrete advantage in that metric. Its support for LPDDR5X memory also differentiates it, since that low-power memory standard appears only on the AMD side. The Radeon 840M integrated graphics may offer different media and display capabilities than Intel's UHD Graphics 770, though no graphics benchmarks appear in the dataset.

For deployment scenarios, the recorded data supports a clear split. The Intel Core i7-14701TE is the choice when raw compute throughput is the priority, especially for rendering, compilation, data processing, and other multithreaded tasks where its 8 cores, 16 threads, 5.20 GHz boost clock, and 33 MB L3 cache provide the necessary headroom. Its desktop socket and Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes also position it for systems that need high-bandwidth expansion. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i is positioned for embedded and mobile applications where the 28 W power envelope, compact FP8 socket, and LPDDR5X memory support take precedence over peak performance. Its 4 nm process and 2026 release date suggest a more modern fabrication approach, but the database lacks benchmark scores to translate that into a performance comparison. The AMD chip's 50th percentile ranking indicates it sits at the median of all CPUs, a modest position that aligns with its efficiency-first design goals rather than a performance-first posture.