AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 and Intel Core Ultra 5 336H are two mobile processors aimed at different priorities, and the recorded data shows a clear performance split. The Intel part dominates most compute-heavy workloads, while the AMD chip carves out a narrow but real advantage in one specific integer task. This analysis walks through the head-to-head results, where each chip wins, and what the architecture and specification differences mean for the benchmark outcomes.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head PassMark results show a lopsided contest. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins 10 of the 11 recorded tests, with the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 taking only a single victory. The margins, however, vary dramatically by workload.

The largest Intel win comes in the prime number search test. Intel scores 299 against AMD’s 57, a delta of -80.9% (meaning AMD trails by that percentage). This is an extreme gap, likely reflecting the Intel part’s higher core count and different instruction handling. The physics test shows a similar story: Intel posts 2682 versus 1022, a -61.9% delta for AMD. Floating point math also heavily favors Intel, with a score of 82415 compared to 42248, a -48.7% difference.

Data encryption favors Intel by a wide margin as well. Intel scores 21291, AMD scores 11444, a -46.2% delta. Extended instructions show Intel ahead at 24542 versus 16520, a -32.7% gap. The multithread test gives Intel 28545 against AMD’s 19262, a -32.5% delta. Data compression is another Intel win: 280340 versus 230437, a -17.8% difference. Random string sorting goes to Intel at 34402 versus 25181, a -26.8% delta.

The single-thread results are closer but still favor Intel. Intel scores 4013, AMD scores 3713, a -7.5% delta. This is the smallest margin in Intel’s favor, indicating that the AMD core design is competitive per-thread, but not quite at Intel’s level.

The one AMD victory is in integer math. AMD scores 62249, Intel scores 62070, a delta of only 0.3% in AMD’s favor. This is a razor-thin margin, nearly a statistical tie, but it is a genuine win in the recorded data. Every other test, including data compression, encryption, and multithreaded workloads, goes to Intel with margins ranging from moderate to overwhelming.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark distribution, the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is the clear choice for any workload that stresses parallel execution or heavy arithmetic. The multithread score of 28545 versus 19262 shows a 48% advantage, which translates directly to tasks like video rendering, 3D physics simulation, and bulk data processing. The physics score, 2682 versus 1022, confirms this: Intel is nearly 2.6 times faster in that specific test. Similarly, the floating point math score of 82415 versus 42248 indicates Intel handles scientific and engineering calculations with far more throughput.

The data encryption result, 21291 versus 11444, shows Intel is significantly better at cryptographic operations. This matters for secure file transfers, database encryption, and any workload involving compressed or protected data streams. Data compression, at 280340 versus 230437, also favors Intel, so archiving and decompression tasks will complete faster on the Intel chip.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 wins only in integer math, and by a negligible margin. The 0.3% delta is within measurement noise, but the recorded data does list AMD as the winner. This means for pure integer arithmetic loops, such as certain database indexing or checksum calculations, AMD is technically ahead, though the practical difference is imperceptible.

Single-thread performance is close, with Intel ahead by 7.5%. That means for lightly threaded applications like legacy software or single-core-dependent tasks, Intel still holds a modest edge. The AMD chip is not far behind, however, and its 4.50 GHz boost clock helps keep the gap small.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward split. For users prioritizing raw multi-core throughput, encryption, physics simulation, or floating point math, the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is the superior processor. Its 16 cores and 16 threads, combined with an 18 MB shared L3 cache, deliver scores that are 30% to 80% higher than AMD in most tests. The Intel part also leads in single-thread performance, meaning it is not just a multi-core monster but also a capable single-core performer.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 is only ahead in integer math, and by a negligible amount. Its 6 cores and 12 threads are far fewer than Intel’s 16 cores, and its 4 MB L3 cache is a fraction of Intel’s 18 MB. The benchmark results reflect this: AMD trails massively in multithreaded and floating point workloads. The only scenario where AMD is preferable, based strictly on the data, is a workload that is purely integer-bound and where the 0.3% edge matters, which is an extremely narrow use case.

Given the recorded benchmark scores, the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is the better processor for almost every measurable task. The AMD chip does have a higher percentile ranking (86th versus 84th), but that is based on its average benchmark score of 37804 versus Intel’s 34485, a difference that comes from the specific mix of tests in the PassMark suite. In the head-to-head comparison, Intel wins decisively.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H scores 4013 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 3713. Intel leads by 7.5%.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two chips?

A: The largest delta is in the prime number search test. Intel scores 299, AMD scores 57, giving Intel an 80.9% advantage.

Q: Does the AMD chip win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 wins the integer math test with a score of 62249 versus Intel’s 62070, a 0.3% margin.

Q: How do the multithread scores compare?

A: Intel scores 28545 in the PassMark multithread test, AMD scores 19262. Intel is 32.5% ahead.

Q: Which chip has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache size?

A: Intel has 18 MB of shared L3 cache. AMD has 4 MB of L3 cache.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses the Panther Lake architecture, specifically Panther Lake-H, and is manufactured on Intel’s 3 nm process.

Core counts differ substantially. AMD provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while Intel provides 16 cores and 16 threads. Intel does not use simultaneous multithreading, hence 16 threads for 16 cores. AMD uses its standard SMT implementation, giving 12 threads from 6 cores.

The cache hierarchy is also distinct. AMD allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a total of 4 MB of L3 cache. Intel provides 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger Intel L3 cache, combined with more cores, explains its dominance in multithreaded and data-heavy tests.

Integrated graphics differ as well. AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses Intel Xe3 Graphics. Neither GPU was benchmarked in the provided data, but their presence affects the overall platform capabilities.

Memory support is similar: both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X, and both use a dual-channel memory bus. AMD supports ECC memory, Intel does not. The memory bandwidth differs notably: AMD measures 89.6 GB/s, Intel measures 115.2 GB/s, a 29% advantage for Intel that contributes to its higher throughput in memory-intensive tests.

PCIe connectivity also differs. AMD offers PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes. Intel offers PCIe Gen 5 with 12 CPU lanes. The newer PCIe generation on Intel allows higher per-lane bandwidth, though the lane count is lower.

The production status for both is listed as Active. AMD’s socket is AMD Socket FP8, Intel’s is Intel BGA 2540.

Specification Differences

The two chips differ in several key specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Intel boosts slightly higher, which aligns with its single-thread lead.

Thermal design power differs: AMD is rated at 28 W, Intel at 25 W. Intel delivers higher performance at a lower TDP, which is notable for mobile deployments.

The process nodes differ: AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC, Intel uses 3 nm from its own foundry. Intel’s smaller node likely contributes to its efficiency and higher core count.

Memory bandwidth is another difference: AMD provides 89.6 GB/s, Intel provides 115.2 GB/s. This is a 28.6% advantage for Intel.

ECC memory support is present on AMD, absent on Intel. This is a differentiator for systems requiring error-correcting memory.

PCIe generation and lanes differ: AMD has Gen 4 with 14 lanes, Intel has Gen 5 with 12 lanes. Intel’s newer standard offers more bandwidth per lane.

The integrated GPU is different: AMD uses Radeon 840M, Intel uses Intel Xe3 Graphics. Both are integrated, but no benchmark data covers their relative performance.

The release dates also differ. Intel was released on 2026-01-04, AMD on 2026-03-08. Intel is earlier by roughly two months.

The part number for Intel is SA4RD, while AMD’s is listed as unknown. Intel’s series is Core Ultra Series 3, while AMD’s series is null.

The percentile rankings differ slightly: AMD is in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, Intel in the 84th. This is based on their average benchmark scores, which are 37804 for AMD and 34485 for Intel, despite Intel winning the head-to-head. The discrepancy arises because the average score includes different test suites and weights than the direct comparisons.