AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Comparison

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are two mobile processors that land in the same performance tier, with average benchmark scores of 32697 and 32662 respectively. Despite this near-identical overall standing, the data reveals a clear split in workload strengths: Intel’s 16-core, 22-thread Meteor Lake part dominates heavily threaded and math-intensive tasks, while AMD’s 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 Strix Point chip takes single-threaded and extended instruction workloads. The head-to-head results show Intel winning 10 of 15 benchmarks, with AMD taking the remaining 5, yet the margins tell a more nuanced story than the raw win count suggests.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is the clear choice for multi-threaded productivity and computational workloads. Its biggest victory comes in PassMark’s find prime numbers test, where it scores 113 against AMD’s 76, a 48.7% advantage. The gap is nearly as large in floating point math, with Intel posting 63703 versus 46996, a 35.5% lead, and in physics simulation, where it wins 1727 to 1257, a 37.4% margin. These results point to a processor that excels when the task involves sustained parallel execution across many cores. The Cinebench R15 multicore test reinforces this, with Intel scoring 2450 against AMD’s 2023, a 21.1% win, while the Cinebench R23 multicore result shows a narrower but still decisive 8.9% advantage (15028 vs 13794).

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, by contrast, wins every single-threaded test where both were measured. In Cinebench R23 single-core, AMD scores 1958 against Intel’s 1743, an 11% advantage, and in the R15 single-core test it wins 271 to 255, a 5.9% margin. PassMark’s single-thread benchmark shows AMD ahead by 10.2% (3862 vs 3468). The AMD chip also takes the extended instructions test, scoring 18029 versus Intel’s 16456, an 8.7% win. This pattern indicates that AMD’s higher 5.00 GHz boost clock and newer Zen 5 architecture give it the edge in lightly threaded, latency-sensitive work, even though it has half the cores of its rival.

For data compression and encryption, Intel holds the advantage. The Core Ultra 7 155H wins data compression with 277353 against 256603, an 8.1% margin, and data encryption by 23.3% (16358 vs 13264). Integer math also favors Intel, with a 12.2% lead (86870 vs 77414), as does random string sorting at 12.7% (31990 vs 28390) and the PassMark multithread test at 12.4% (24873 vs 22125). These wins suggest Intel’s larger core count and 24 MB of shared L3 cache provide a substantial throughput advantage in memory-heavy and parallel integer tasks.

The Verdict

The data shows two different design philosophies. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is built for raw multi-threaded horsepower, and its 16 cores and 22 threads deliver exactly that. Anyone running CPU-bound rendering, scientific simulations, or heavy data processing will get measurably better performance from Intel. The 48.7% lead in prime number finding and 35.5% lead in floating point math are not minor differences; they represent real time savings in workloads that scale with core count. Intel’s 10 benchmark wins out of 15, including all four PassMark math-oriented tests, make it the default recommendation for productivity-first users.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is the pick for users who prioritize snappy single-threaded response and instruction-heavy code. Its 11% advantage in Cinebench R23 single-core and 10.2% lead in PassMark single-thread are meaningful for everyday application responsiveness, where most tasks still rely on one or two cores. The 8.7% win in extended instructions also hints at better performance in specialized SIMD workloads. However, AMD’s overall average score of 32662 is effectively tied with Intel’s 32697, and its 8-core, 16-thread configuration cannot match Intel’s parallel throughput. For a balanced mobile CPU, the Intel part offers more raw capability across a wider range of tasks.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single benchmark delta is in PassMark’s find prime numbers test, where Intel’s 113 score crushes AMD’s 76 by 48.7%. This is a pure multi-threaded integer workload, and Intel’s core advantage is decisive. Floating point math shows a similar story, with Intel at 63703 versus AMD’s 46996, a 35.5% margin. The physics test, which often reflects real-world simulation performance, gives Intel a 37.4% lead at 1727 vs 1257. These three tests alone establish Intel’s domination in compute-heavy tasks.

In Cinebench R15 multicore, Intel wins 2450 to 2023, a 21.1% margin, but the newer R23 test narrows the gap to 8.9% (15028 vs 13794). This suggests that AMD’s Zen 5 cores are more efficient per-thread, but Intel’s additional threads still carry the day. Data encryption is another strong Intel showing, with a 23.3% win (16358 vs 13264), likely benefiting from Intel’s larger L3 cache and higher core count. Integer math adds to Intel’s tally with a 12.2% win (86870 vs 77414), and the PassMark multithread test gives Intel a 12.4% edge (24873 vs 22125).

AMD’s wins are concentrated in single-threaded and instruction-level tests. Cinebench R23 single-core is its best result, with AMD scoring 1958 against Intel’s 1743, an 11% margin. PassMark single-thread shows AMD at 3862 versus 3468, a 10.2% lead, and the R15 single-core test gives AMD a 5.9% edge (271 vs 255). The extended instructions test rounds out AMD’s wins with an 8.7% advantage (18029 vs 16456). These margins are consistent and indicate that AMD’s per-core performance is superior, but they cannot offset Intel’s multi-core dominance in the aggregate.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has an average benchmark score of 32697, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, a difference of just 0.1% in Intel’s favor.

Q: How large is the Intel chip’s lead in Cinebench R15 multicore?

A: Intel scores 2450 compared to AMD’s 2023, giving it a 21.1% advantage in that test.

Q: What is the AMD processor’s best single-threaded result?

A: AMD’s best single-threaded win is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where it scores 1958 against Intel’s 1743, an 11% margin.

Q: Which chip wins more head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H wins 10 of the 15 head-to-head tests, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 wins 5.

Q: What is the largest performance gap in any test?

A: The largest gap is in PassMark’s find prime numbers test, where Intel outscores AMD 113 to 76, a 48.7% difference.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory bandwidth?

A: Yes, both have dual-channel memory support with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, though AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X while Intel supports DDR5.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is built on Intel’s 7 nm process and uses the Meteor Lake architecture. It packs 16 cores and 22 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Intel’s integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 128 execution units. The chip uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes. It launched on 2023-12-13 with a launch MSRP of $503.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses TSMC’s 4 nm process and the Zen 5 architecture, specifically the Strix Point design with a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache is smaller per core, with 80 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2, and the L3 cache is 8 MB total. AMD’s integrated graphics are the Radeon 880M. It fits the AMD Socket FP8 and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. The die size is 233 mm², and it launched on 2025-01-05.

The core and cache differences are stark. Intel has twice the cores and threads, plus three times the L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB), which explains its multi-threaded dominance. AMD compensates with a newer 4 nm process, a higher 5.00 GHz boost clock, and a smaller die, which likely contributes to its single-threaded wins. AMD also supports ECC memory, while Intel does not. Both chips share a 28 W TDP, but Intel’s higher core count and cache size come at the cost of a larger power footprint per thread. The PCIe difference is notable: Intel offers Gen 5 with fewer lanes, while AMD offers Gen 4 with twice as many lanes.