AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and Intel Core i9-14901TE are both 8-core, 16-thread processors, but they target different segments and are built on fundamentally different architectures. The AMD chip is a mobile-focused part using the Zen 5 core design, while the Intel chip is a desktop-oriented processor based on Raptor Lake. The recorded data shows a clear performance gap, with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 holding a significant advantage in the available benchmark results.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is the clear winner in every benchmark category recorded in the database. It excels across the board, from single-threaded responsiveness to heavily multithreaded workloads. In the Cinebench tests, which are standard for measuring both single-core and multi-core rendering performance, the AMD chip posts substantially higher scores. The Radeon 880M integrated graphics also gives it an edge for tasks that can leverage GPU acceleration, though head-to-head GPU benchmarks are not available in this data set.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE, on the other hand, has no recorded benchmark wins in the database. Its benchmark array is empty, meaning there are no measured scores to compare directly. The data shows it has a higher base clock of 2.30 GHz and a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz compared to the AMD part's 2.00 GHz and 5.00 GHz, which could suggest an advantage in raw clock speed, but without actual benchmark scores, this cannot be confirmed. The Intel chip also supports DDR4 memory, which the AMD chip does not, and it uses a larger L3 cache. However, in terms of measured performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is the only one of the two with data indicating wins.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360's performance is strong enough to place it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, all of which it slightly trails or nearly matches, include the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and the Intel Core i5-14600T. This positioning suggests it is a highly competitive mobile processor, though it does not lead its immediate peer group. The Intel Core i9-14901TE sits in the 50th percentile, which is the median, but this is based on an average benchmark score of zero, so the percentile is not meaningful without actual data.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on very different foundations. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Strix Point, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i9-14901TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. This process node difference is significant, as the smaller 4 nm node typically allows for better power efficiency and higher transistor density.

Cache configurations differ notably. Both chips have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core on the AMD side, while the Intel chip has 2 MB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache is a major differentiator: the AMD part has 8 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel part has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This larger L3 cache on the Intel chip could benefit workloads that repeatedly access a large working set of data, but the benchmark data does not show this translating into a performance win in the recorded tests.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel bus, but its memory bandwidth is not listed in the database. Both chips support ECC memory, which is a feature for error-correcting code in professional workloads.

The sockets are incompatible: the AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, typically found in mobile platforms, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700, which is a desktop socket. This aligns with their market segments, with the AMD chip listed as Mobile and the Intel chip as Desktop. The PCIe support also differs, with the AMD chip offering Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip's Gen 5 support is a generational advantage for bandwidth-hungry storage or expansion cards.

The integrated graphics are another point of difference. The AMD chip uses Radeon 880M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 770. Both are integrated solutions, but their relative performance is not measured in the available data. The AMD chip has a lower TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel chip has a higher TDP of 45 watts, indicating the Intel part is designed for a more power-hungry desktop environment.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two processors, and the Intel Core i9-14901TE has an empty benchmark list. This means all comparisons must rely on the AMD chip's recorded scores alone. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 produces strong results across multiple tests.

In Cinebench R15, the AMD chip scores 2023 in multicore and 271 in singlecore. In Cinebench R23, it scores 13794 in multicore and 1958 in singlecore. These figures indicate a balanced processor capable of both heavy multi-threaded rendering and snappy single-threaded tasks. The singlecore scores are particularly relevant for everyday applications where responsiveness matters.

PassMark results for the AMD chip cover a wide range of workloads. The data compression score is 256603, which is a high number reflecting efficient handling of compression algorithms. Data encryption scores 13264, while extended instructions score 18029. Finding prime numbers, a classic CPU stress test, scores 76. Floating point math scores 46996, and integer math scores 77414. Multithreaded performance scores 22125, and physics scores 1257. Random string sorting scores 28390, and single-thread performance scores 3862.

These scores show a processor that is strong in integer operations, which are common in general computing, and floating point operations, which are important in scientific and multimedia workloads. The compression and encryption scores suggest good throughput for data-heavy tasks. The multithread score of 22125 indicates solid parallel performance, though it is not the absolute highest in the database.

Without any recorded scores for the Intel Core i9-14901TE, it is impossible to calculate a delta percentage between the two. The database shows the AMD chip has an average benchmark score of 32662, while the Intel chip has an average benchmark score of 0. This zero is not a performance measure but rather a placeholder for missing data. The Intel chip's nearest rivals list is also empty, further confirming the lack of recorded measurements.

The AMD chip's nearest rivals, all with very close average scores, include the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with an average score of 32697 and a delta of negative 0.1 percent, the Intel Core i5-14600T with an average score of 32707 and a delta of negative 0.1 percent, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F with an average score of 32750 and a delta of negative 0.3 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H with an average score of 32812 and a delta of negative 0.5 percent. This shows the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is essentially tied with these parts, trailing by less than one percent in each case.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, but the comparison is one-sided because the Intel Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark results. The AMD chip delivers a full suite of measured scores, from Cinebench rendering to PassMark math and compression tests, and it holds the 83rd percentile position among all CPUs. The Intel chip's 50th percentile is based on no data, so it cannot be used as a meaningful comparison point.

For users considering a mobile platform, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is the only option with verified performance data. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 28 watt TDP, make it a capable processor for a wide range of tasks. The integrated Radeon 880M provides graphics capabilities without a discrete GPU, which is typical for mobile systems.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE is a desktop part with a higher TDP of 45 watts and a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz. It supports DDR4 memory, which could be an advantage for users with existing DDR4 modules, and it offers 36 MB of L3 cache and PCIe Gen 5 support. These specifications suggest it could be a strong desktop processor, but the database contains no evidence of its actual performance. Without benchmark scores, any assessment of its capabilities is speculative.

The recorded data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a well-rounded processor that performs competitively against its nearest rivals, all of which it trails by less than one percent. It is not the fastest CPU in the database, but it is solidly above the median and delivers consistent results across all tested workloads. The Intel Core i9-14901TE, by contrast, has no data to support its performance claims.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has 8 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the Intel Core i9-14901TE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360?

A: The average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is 32662, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-14901TE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark scores for the Intel Core i9-14901TE, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero.

Q: Which processor has a lower TDP?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has a TDP of 28 watts, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-14901TE's TDP of 45 watts.