AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and the Intel Arc G3. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the wins counter shows zero for both processors. This absence of comparable test data means a direct, test-by-test numeric comparison cannot be constructed from recorded measurements.

However, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has a substantial set of individual benchmark scores, while the Intel Arc G3 has no recorded benchmarks. The AMD part's average benchmark score is 32,662 across 15 tests, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Arc G3, lacking any benchmark entries, sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero.

For the AMD processor, the recorded data shows a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,794 and a single-core score of 1,958. In Cinebench R15, the multicore result is 2,023 and single-core is 271. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 22,125, a single-thread score of 3,862, integer math at 77,414, floating-point math at 46,996, and data encryption at 13,264. The data compression score reaches 256,603, extended instructions score 18,029, prime numbers 76, random string sorting 28,390, and physics 1,257.

The nearest rivals for the AMD part, based on average benchmark score, are all within a narrow band. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H averages 32,697, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD part. The Intel Core i5-14600T also averages 32,707, again 0.1% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F averages 32,750, 0.3% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H averages 32,812, 0.5% higher. These delta percentages indicate that the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 sits essentially at parity with its closest competitors, with all four rivals exceeding its average score by less than one percent.

Because the Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark scores and no nearest rivals listed, no numeric comparison between the two processors can be made. The data simply does not contain the measurements needed for a head-to-head analysis.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and Intel Arc G3 differ fundamentally across every major architectural dimension. The AMD processor uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Point codename, built on TSMC's 4 nm process with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel part uses the Panther Lake codename with an Intel 3 nm process; no die size is recorded.

Core counts diverge sharply. The AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part has 14 cores and 14 threads. The AMD processor supports simultaneous multithreading, doubling its thread count, whereas the Intel processor has a one-to-one core-to-thread ratio. Clock speeds also differ, with the AMD part basing at 2.00 GHz and boosting to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel part bases at 1.90 GHz and boosts to 4.60 GHz.

Cache hierarchies show distinct configurations. The AMD part uses 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 pool on the Intel side contrasts with the AMD part's smaller shared cache, though the per-core L1 and L2 allocations are substantially larger on the Intel processor.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD part supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X through a dual-channel memory bus, delivering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. The Intel part supports only LPDDR5X, also dual-channel, but delivers 136.5 GB/s of bandwidth, which is 52% higher than the AMD part, and does not support ECC memory.

PCI Express connectivity is another differentiator. The AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only). The newer PCIe generation on the Intel side comes with fewer lanes, reflecting a different platform design philosophy.

Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD part pairs with a Radeon 880M, while the Intel part includes an Arc B370. Both are mobile processors, with the AMD part rated at 28 W TDP and the Intel part at 25 W TDP. The AMD part uses an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 2540.

The process nodes reflect different foundry choices: AMD uses TSMC's 4 nm process, while Intel uses its own 3 nm process. The AMD part belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, while the Intel part belongs to the Arc G3 generation with Panther Lake.

Release dates are recorded for both, with the AMD part launching on January 5, 2025, and the Intel part launching on May 27, 2026. Both are listed as active in production. The AMD part has a part number of 100-000001571, while the Intel part has part number SA4QZ. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents an asymmetric comparison. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has a full suite of benchmark results, an 83rd percentile ranking, and a set of nearest rivals all within 0.5% of its average score. The Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark data at all, a 50th percentile ranking, and an average score of zero.

For the AMD part, the benchmark data indicates a processor performing at parity with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, the Intel Core i5-14600T, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. The largest delta among these rivals is 0.5%, meaning the AMD part effectively matches these contemporaries across the aggregate benchmark suite.

The Intel Arc G3 cannot be evaluated from a performance standpoint because the database contains no measurements for it. Its 50th percentile ranking and zero average score reflect the absence of data rather than a performance verdict. The architecture shows a higher core count, larger caches, faster memory bandwidth, and a more advanced process node, but without benchmark scores these attributes cannot be translated into performance conclusions.

The AMD part, by contrast, demonstrates concrete results. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,794 and single-core score of 1,958, along with PassMark multithread of 22,125 and single-thread of 3,862, provide quantifiable reference points. The 83rd percentile placement indicates that the AMD part outperforms the majority of all CPUs in the database.

From the available data, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a well-measured, mid-to-high percentile mobile processor. The Intel Arc G3 remains unquantified, and any selection between the two must account for the fact that only one side has recorded performance evidence.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has an average benchmark score of 32,662 across its recorded tests.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for the Intel Arc G3?

A: The Intel Arc G3 is ranked in the 50th percentile of all CPUs, but it has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads.

Q: Which processor has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has a memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 boosts to 5.00 GHz, and the Intel Arc G3 boosts to 4.60 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Arc G3 does not support ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 does.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 wins in every category where recorded data exists. It has a complete benchmark suite, an 83rd percentile ranking, and an average score of 32,662. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its average score, which means it sits at the top of its immediate competitive cluster. The processor's 16 threads from 8 cores provide multithreading capability, and its 5.00 GHz boost clock is the highest among the two parts. The AMD part also supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, includes ECC support, and has a higher TDP at 28 W.

The Intel Arc G3 wins in several architectural categories based on recorded specifications. It has 14 cores versus 8, a larger L3 cache at 18 MB versus 8 MB, and higher per-core L1 and L2 allocations at 192 KB and 2.5 MB versus 80 KB and 1 MB. Its memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s exceeds the AMD part's 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part uses a more advanced 3 nm process versus 4 nm, supports PCIe Gen 5 versus Gen 4, and has a lower TDP at 25 W. It also has a later release date of May 27, 2026, compared to the AMD part's January 5, 2025.

For use-case analysis, the AMD part's benchmark data supports workloads where multithreaded performance matters, such as content creation, data compression, and encryption tasks, given its recorded scores in those specific tests. The Intel part's architectural advantages, larger cache hierarchy and higher memory bandwidth, suggest potential for memory-intensive workloads, but no benchmark data confirms this.

The AMD part's 83rd percentile ranking places it above the median CPU, while the Intel part's 50th percentile reflects its lack of measurements rather than a performance position. The AMD part's nearest rivals, all within 0.1% to 0.5% of its average score, indicate a tightly competitive field at this performance level. The Intel part has no nearest rivals listed, so no competitive positioning can be derived.

In summary, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is the only processor in this comparison with quantitative performance evidence. The Intel Arc G3 offers a stronger specification sheet on paper, but the database contains no scores to validate its real-world behavior. Any workload-based selection must rely on the AMD part's measured results, while the Intel part remains an unverified quantity.