AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G and the Intel Processor 300T?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?

A: The Intel Processor 300T has a base clock of 3.40 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G's base clock of 2.00 GHz.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G boosts up to 4.80 GHz. The Intel Processor 300T has no listed boost clock in the database.

Q: What are the power consumption ratings for these CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has a TDP of 65 watts. The Intel Processor 300T has a TDP of 35 watts.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300T does not list ECC memory support.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Processor 300T is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G and the Intel Processor 300T come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD part is based on the Gorgon Point codename, using the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation with a hybrid arrangement of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. This architecture is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, giving it a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Processor 300T is built on the older Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, using a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 163 mm².

The core configurations differ sharply. The AMD chip offers 6 physical cores and 12 threads, while the Intel chip offers only 2 cores and 4 threads. The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core for both, but the L2 cache differs: AMD provides 1 MB per core, while Intel provides 1.25 MB per core. L3 cache totals 8 MB on the AMD processor, while the Intel processor has 6 MB shared.

Platform support also diverges. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also in dual-channel configuration, though its memory bandwidth is not listed. PCIe connectivity is another major split: the AMD chip offers Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G carries a Radeon 840M, while the Intel Processor 300T uses UHD Graphics 710. Both processors have locked multipliers, so neither supports unlocked overclocking. The AMD chip supports ECC memory, while the Intel chip does not. Release dates are also far apart: the AMD processor launched in March 2026, while the Intel processor launched in January 2024. Both are listed as Active in production status.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not currently list any head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors, and no individual benchmark scores are recorded for either unit. That absence of measured data makes a direct performance comparison difficult. However, the architectural specifications in the database allow for a structural analysis of where each part should hold an advantage.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has a 3x core advantage and a 3x thread advantage over the Intel Processor 300T. In multi-threaded workloads that scale well with core count, the AMD chip has a clear structural lead. The 8 MB of L3 cache versus 6 MB also favors the AMD part in scenarios where larger working sets benefit from more shared cache. The higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz, compared to no listed boost on the Intel part, gives the AMD chip a clock-speed ceiling that the Intel chip cannot match on paper.

The Intel Processor 300T counters with a 3.40 GHz base clock, which is 1.4 GHz higher than the AMD chip's 2.00 GHz base. For single-threaded tasks that rely primarily on base frequency and do not scale with core count, the Intel part may exhibit lower latency in lightly threaded operations. The Intel chip also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is a generation ahead of the AMD chip's PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes. This gives the Intel platform more headroom for high-bandwidth devices such as modern GPUs or NVMe storage. The Intel chip also has a higher L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB versus 1 MB, which can help in certain per-core workloads.

Both processors share the same percentile ranking in the database at 50 for percentileVsAllCpus, and both have an average benchmark score of 0. The lack of measured performance data means any claims about real-world speed are projections from the recorded specifications rather than direct observations.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear split in intended use cases. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G offers 6 cores, 12 threads, a 4.80 GHz boost clock, 8 MB of L3 cache, ECC memory support, and a 65-watt TDP. The Intel Processor 300T offers 2 cores, 4 threads, a 3.40 GHz base clock, 6 MB of L3 cache, no ECC support, and a 35-watt TDP. On paper, the AMD part is the stronger multi-threaded processor, while the Intel part is the lower-power, higher-base-clock alternative.

The AMD chip is the better choice for workloads that demand parallel processing, larger cache, and memory reliability features like ECC. The Intel chip is the better choice for systems where power consumption is the priority and where the higher base clock may benefit simple, single-threaded tasks. The Intel part also has the advantage of a lower launch MSRP of $82, which can be stated once as a point of reference. Given the 30-watt TDP difference, the Intel chip draws significantly less power, which may matter in compact or thermally constrained builds.

The absence of benchmark data means the verdict rests on specifications. The AMD processor is the higher-end part in terms of core count, cache size, boost capability, and memory bandwidth. The Intel processor is the more efficient part in terms of power draw and offers newer PCIe connectivity. Neither part has a recorded benchmark score, so the final choice depends on which set of specifications matches the user's workload requirements.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification field in the database.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G | Intel Processor 300T |

|---------------|------------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 2 |

| Threads | 12 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | Not listed |

| TDP | 65 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-S |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 12 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Release Date | 2026-03-01 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $82 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

The L1 cache is the only matching field. Every other specification shows a meaningful difference between the two parts.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G wins in scenarios that benefit from multiple cores and threads. With 6 cores and 12 threads, it has a 3x advantage over the Intel Processor 300T in both categories. Multi-threaded rendering, compilation, video encoding, and simulation workloads should favor the AMD chip. The 8 MB L3 cache versus 6 MB gives it an edge in data-heavy tasks that repeatedly access a larger working set. The 4.80 GHz boost clock provides a high-frequency ceiling for burst workloads that can scale up to that speed. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, recorded only on the AMD side, supports memory-intensive operations. ECC memory support makes the AMD chip suitable for error-sensitive environments such as data processing or long-running compute tasks.

The Intel Processor 300T wins in efficiency and platform-level connectivity. Its 35-watt TDP is nearly half the AMD chip's 65-watt TDP, making it the lower-power option for always-on systems, small form factor builds, or basic office machines. The 3.40 GHz base clock is 1.4 GHz higher than the AMD chip's base clock, which can translate to snappier response in single-threaded applications that do not boost. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes is a full generation ahead of the AMD chip's PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes, giving the Intel platform more bandwidth for expansion cards and storage devices. The higher L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB versus 1 MB may help in per-core workloads that repeatedly access a small, fast cache. The Intel chip also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering more flexibility in memory selection for existing or new builds.

The launch MSRP of $82 for the Intel Processor 300T places it at a different price point, though no comparable price is recorded for the AMD part. The Intel chip is also the earlier release, having launched in January 2024 versus March 2026 for the AMD part. Both processors are production-active and locked from multiplier overclocking. The database shows no benchmark wins for either side, so the advantage split is derived entirely from the recorded specifications.