AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits cleanly by processor lineage. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, while the Intel Core i5-14401E carries a full set of Cinebench results. This means every measurable performance comparison currently favors the Intel part, but the AMD processor has architectural advantages that the recorded data does not yet capture.

The Intel Core i5-14401E posts an average benchmark score of 5253 and sits at the 60th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals bracket it tightly: the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 averages 5259 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i7-11700B averages 5241 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core i9-10850K averages 5240 (0.2% lower), and the Intel Core i5-13400T averages 5210 (0.8% lower). This places the i5-14401E in a crowded performance band where single-digit percentage differences separate it from several established desktop and mobile-class parts.

In multi-threaded workloads, the i5-14401E delivers its strongest showing. Cinebench R23 multi-core yields 18161 points, R20 multi-core yields 7627, and R15 multi-core yields 1830. These scores indicate a processor that scales well across all six cores and twelve threads. The single-core results follow the same pattern: R23 single-core at 2564, R20 single-core at 1076, and R15 single-core at 258. The single-core figures are competitive for the segment, confirming that the Intel chip does not sacrifice lightly threaded responsiveness for multi-core throughput.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G enters the comparison with zero recorded benchmarks and an average score of 0. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median of the database, but that ranking appears provisional pending actual test data. The architectural specifications suggest a modern 4 nm TSMC design with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, a higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz versus the Intel chip's 4.70 GHz, and a smaller die at 195 mm² against 215 mm². Those figures point to potential efficiency gains, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot quantify them.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different design philosophies and manufacturing approaches. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation built on Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Core i5-14401E belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 215 mm². The process node difference is substantial: 4 nm versus 10 nm, which typically translates into density and power efficiency advantages for the AMD part, though the database records no power efficiency measurements to confirm this.

Both processors have six cores and twelve threads, so thread count parity is exact. Cache configurations diverge significantly. The AMD chip allocates 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, for a modest 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip also uses 80 KB of L1 per core but allocates 1.25 MB of L2 per core and features a much larger 20 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 2.5 times the L3 capacity, which can matter in workloads with large working sets that fit in cache.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only with dual-channel memory and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, but the database does not record a memory bandwidth figure for it. The AMD part therefore has a documented bandwidth advantage, while the Intel part offers broader memory compatibility. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities also split the two. The AMD chip provides PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation and more lanes, which matters for expansion cards, NVMe drives, and GPU bandwidth. The integrated graphics differ: the AMD processor uses a Radeon 840M, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 730. The database does not include graphics benchmarks, so relative iGPU performance is not quantified.

Socket platforms are incompatible. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part carries part number 100-000001915 and the Intel part carries Q49JSRNJS. The Intel processor was released on 2024-06-30, while the AMD processor has a later release date of 2026-03-01. Both are listed as Active in production status.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors, and the AMD part has no individual benchmark scores. All measurable performance data therefore comes from the Intel Core i5-14401E. Its Cinebench results establish a baseline for what a six-core, twelve-thread desktop processor in this class can achieve.

The i5-14401E scores 18161 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. That number, taken alongside its 2564 R23 single-core score, shows a balanced profile. The multi-core score is roughly seven times the single-core score, which is consistent with a six-core processor with strong per-core efficiency. The R20 results follow a similar pattern: 7627 multi-core versus 1076 single-core. The R15 results show 1830 multi-core versus 258 single-core. Across all three Cinebench versions, the Intel chip maintains consistent scaling.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i5-14401E sits in a narrow competitive window. The Xeon E5-2699A v4 averages 5259, just 0.1% above the Intel chip. The Core i7-11700B averages 5241, 0.2% below. The Core i9-10850K averages 5240, also 0.2% below. The Core i5-13400T averages 5210, 0.8% below. These deltas indicate that the i5-14401E performs essentially at parity with several well-known processors from previous generations. It neither dominates nor trails its closest competitors by a meaningful margin.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has no scores to compare directly. The database records a percentile rank of 50 for it, versus 60 for the Intel chip, but the AMD rank is not supported by any benchmark entries. The Intel chip's average benchmark score of 5253 places it clearly above the median, while the AMD chip's recorded average of 0 reflects missing data rather than actual performance. Any claim that the AMD part wins in a specific workload cannot be supported from the current measurements.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401E boosts to 4.70 GHz. The AMD part holds a 0.10 GHz advantage in maximum frequency.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 2.5 times the L3 capacity.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G and the Intel Core i5-14401E list ECC memory support as true.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G supports DDR5 only. The Intel Core i5-14401E supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory configurations.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has an average benchmark score of 5253. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has a recorded average of 0, because no benchmark scores exist for it in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14401E compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4?

A: The Xeon E5-2699A v4 averages 5259, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-14401E's 5253. The two processors are effectively at parity.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear conclusion for anyone choosing based on available measurements: the Intel Core i5-14401E is the only processor in this comparison with actual performance results. It averages 5253 points across the database, ranks at the 60th percentile of all CPUs, and posts strong Cinebench numbers across R15, R20, and R23 in both multi-core and single-core tests. Its nearest rivals sit within 0.8% of its average score, confirming that it performs in line with established high-end parts from prior generations. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 make it a flexible platform choice.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G cannot be recommended from performance data that does not exist. Its architectural specifications are competitive on paper: a 4 nm TSMC process, Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores, a 4.80 GHz boost clock, and a documented 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. The 195 mm² die is smaller than the Intel chip's 215 mm², and the newer release date suggests a more recent design. But the database records no benchmark scores for it, no average score, and no rival comparisons. Its 50th percentile rank is unsupported by measurements.

For workloads that rely on measured multi-threaded throughput, the Intel Core i5-14401E delivers 18161 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 7627 in R20 multi-core. For lightly threaded tasks, its 2564 R23 single-core and 1076 R20 single-core scores are solid. The AMD part offers a higher boost clock and a more advanced manufacturing process, but those specifications do not translate into recorded performance advantages. The verdict from the data: choose the Intel Core i5-14401E for verified performance, and treat the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G as an unmeasured entrant whose capabilities remain undocumented in the database.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G | Intel Core i5-14401E |

|-------|------------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 6 |

| Threads | 12 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Architecture | Zen 5 / Zen 5c | Raptor Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 20 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 12 lanes (CPU) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Release Date | 2026-03-01 | 2024-06-30 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 60 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 5253 |