AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G vs Intel Core i5-14400T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data set includes a complete benchmark suite only for the Intel Core i5-14400T. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has no individual benchmark scores or head-to-head results in the database. Consequently, the analysis below is based on the Intel part's measured performance, its percentile ranking, and its nearest rivals, while the AMD part's capabilities are described from its specification fields alone.

The Intel Core i5-14400T posts an average benchmark score of 27166, which places it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs in the database. This is a strong showing for a desktop processor, and its nearest rivals confirm the consistency of that result. The Intel Core i9-9900K scores 27097, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27051, 0.4% lower. The Intel Core i7-13700H scores 27355, which is 0.7% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G scores 27382, 0.8% higher. These four rivals sit within a narrow band of roughly one percentage point, indicating that the i5-14400T delivers a level of aggregate performance comparable to both older flagship desktop parts and newer mobile H-series silicon.

Looking at the multicore Cinebench results, the i5-14400T scores 1732 in Cinebench R15 multicore, 7219 in R20 multicore, and 17189 in R23 multicore. The scaling from R20 to R23 is typical for this class: the R23 score is about 2.38 times the R20 value, which is consistent with the standard workload expansion between those two test versions. In single-core tests, the part scores 244 in R15, 1018 in R20, and 2426 in R23. The single-core R23 score represents about 14.1% of the multicore R23 score, which indicates that the processor scales well across all cores when the workload is fully threaded.

The PassMark suite reveals where the Intel part is strongest. In integer math, the i5-14400T scores 65667. In floating point math, it scores 49139. The extended instructions test returns 14562, while data encryption scores 13244 and data compression scores 235636. The find prime numbers test returns a score of 73, which is a much lower absolute value but reflects the specific nature of that workload rather than a general weakness. Random string sorting scores 25181. The PassMark multithread score is 20223, and the single-thread score is 3512, recorded under two test names in the database (passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread both list 3512). Physics performance in PassMark is 1244.

The data shows a clear imbalance: the Intel Core i5-14400T has 17 benchmark entries, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has zero. As such, there are no direct wins or losses to tally between the two processors. The winsA and winsB counters are both zero, confirming that the database contains no head-to-head benchmark comparisons for this pair. Any comparison of performance must therefore rely on the Intel part's measured scores and the AMD part's architectural specifications, not on direct measured competition.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty. The Intel Core i5-14400T has 17 recorded benchmark scores.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400T compare to its closest rivals?

A: The i5-14400T averages 27166. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-9900K (27097), 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G (27051), and 0.7% behind the Intel Core i7-13700H (27355). It is 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G (27382).

Q: What is the best single-core result for the Intel Core i5-14400T?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, the i5-14400T scores 2426. In R20 single-core it scores 1018, and in R15 single-core it scores 244. The PassMark single-thread score is 3512.

Q: What is the best multicore result for the Intel Core i5-14400T?

A: The highest recorded multicore score is 17189 in Cinebench R23. Cinebench R20 multicore is 7219, and Cinebench R15 multicore is 1732. PassMark multithread scores 20223.

Q: Are both processors currently in production?

A: Yes. The database lists both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G and the Intel Core i5-14400T as having an Active production status.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G lists ECC memory as true, and the Intel Core i5-14400T also lists ECC memory as true.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the Intel Core i5-14400T is the only processor of the two with measurable performance. Its 79th percentile ranking, backed by 17 benchmark scores, places it in the upper tier of desktop CPUs. The nearest rivals, which include the Intel Core i9-9900K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, all land within one percentage point of the i5-14400T's average score, which confirms that the part delivers competitive aggregate performance against well-known prior-generation flagships. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G, by contrast, has no benchmark data, no average score, and no rival comparisons. From a pure data perspective, the i5-14400T is the only part with evidence of performance.

For a user selecting strictly on measured results, the Intel Core i5-14400T is the defensible choice. It has a recorded average score of 27166, a 79th percentile rank, and a full suite of Cinebench and PassMark numbers. The AMD part's lack of data means no performance claim can be made from the database. The AMD processor does offer architectural advantages on paper, such as a smaller process node and higher boost clock, but without benchmark scores those specifications cannot be translated into performance conclusions.

The verdict from the data is clear: the Intel Core i5-14400T is the only one of the two with demonstrated processing capability, and it sits at a high percentile relative to all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G remains unquantified in this database, so any performance judgement about it would be unsupported.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ substantially in core and thread counts. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i5-14400T has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. Despite the lower base and boost clocks, the Intel part's higher core count gives it more raw thread throughput potential.

Thermal design power differs widely. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has a TDP of 65 watts. The Intel Core i5-14400T has a TDP of 35 watts. This means the Intel part is rated for lower power draw, while the AMD part is rated for a higher power envelope.

Socket compatibility is entirely different. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. These are not interchangeable platforms.

Memory support also differs. The AMD part supports only DDR5 memory, with dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also dual-channel, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth value for it.

PCIe connectivity differs. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core i5-14400T provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part offers both a newer PCIe generation and more lanes.

Integrated graphics differ. The AMD part includes Radeon 840M graphics. The Intel part includes UHD Graphics 730.

Release dates differ by roughly two years. The Intel Core i5-14400T has a release date of January 2024. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has a release date of March 2026. The Intel part also has a launch MSRP of $221, stated once here, while the AMD part has no listed MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, built on Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Core i5-14400T uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, belonging to the Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 215 mm².

Cache configurations differ. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, giving a total L3 cache of 8 MB. The Intel part also has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and a shared L3 cache of 20 MB. The Intel part has significantly more L3 cache, 20 MB versus 8 MB.

The process node difference is notable: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. The database does not list transistor counts for either part, so no comparison can be made there. The AMD part uses Zen 5 and Zen 5c core types, indicating a hybrid core arrangement, while the Intel part uses a single Raptor Lake core design. Neither processor has a 3D V-Cache option listed in the database. The AMD part has a part number of 100-000001915, while the Intel part has a part number of SRN3N. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning neither supports user overclocking via multiplier adjustment.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400T wins in all measured performance categories, simply because it is the only part with recorded benchmarks. Its 10 cores and 16 threads give it a structural advantage in heavily threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17189 and PassMark multithread score of 20223 reflect that capacity. The Intel part also shows strength in integer math (65667) and floating point math (49139), which are common in scientific and financial computing. Data compression scores 235636, indicating strong throughput for archiving and data processing tasks. Extended instructions score 14562, which supports workloads using SIMD-style operations.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G cannot be assigned wins in any benchmark category because the database contains no scores for it. However, its specifications suggest areas where it could compete. The 4.80 GHz boost clock is higher than the Intel part's 4.50 GHz, which may favor lightly threaded tasks if measured. The 4 nm process node, versus Intel's 10 nm, implies a denser transistor layout, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is explicitly listed, which could benefit memory-intensive workloads. The Radeon 840M integrated graphics may outperform the UHD Graphics 730, but no graphics benchmarks exist in the database to confirm this.

The Intel part also wins on power efficiency from a rated TDP perspective, with 35 watts versus 65 watts for the AMD part. This gives the Intel processor a lower thermal design envelope, which matters for compact desktop builds. The Intel part has a larger L3 cache at 20 MB versus 8 MB, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering platform flexibility. The AMD part has a newer release date (March 2026 versus January 2024) and a smaller process node, but those are manufacturing attributes, not measured performance results. In terms of platform features, the Intel part provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes. For users who need the latest PCIe connectivity, the Intel part holds the edge on paper.

The data-driven conclusion is that the Intel Core i5-14400T is the only processor with demonstrated wins. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G remains a specification-only entry, with no measured evidence of performance in any workload category.