AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G versus the Intel Core i5-110. Both processors record no benchmark scores in the compiled dataset, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. Consequently, there are no measured wins for either side, no percentile deltas, and no average score comparisons to draw from. The absence of benchmark data means that any performance hierarchy must be inferred from the architectural and specification differences recorded in the database, rather than from empirical test results.

Both parts share a common 6-core, 12-thread configuration, which places them in the same general processing tier. The AMD part lists a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the Intel part lists a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. Based solely on clock specifications, the AMD processor holds a 0.50 GHz advantage at maximum boost, while the Intel processor holds a 0.90 GHz advantage at base frequency. Without benchmark scores, the practical impact of these clock differences cannot be quantified, but the raw numbers indicate the AMD part has a higher ceiling for single-thread burst workloads, whereas the Intel part maintains a higher floor for sustained all-core operation at base clocks.

Both processors are recorded with a TDP of 65 watts, placing them in the same power envelope. The database does not include any measured thermal or power data, so the efficiency comparison cannot be derived from recorded numbers. The process node difference is substantial: the AMD part uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 14 nm process from Intel. This architectural gap suggests the AMD part should have a significant efficiency advantage, but the database does not contain wattage measurements to confirm that expectation.

The benchmark arrays for both CPUs are empty. The percentile versus all CPUs field records a value of 50 for both parts, which indicates neither has a performance ranking advantage in the current dataset. The average benchmark score is zero for both, further confirming the lack of recorded measurements. The nearest rivals arrays are also empty, so no comparative scores from other processors are available to contextualize either part.

Where Each One Wins

The absence of benchmark data prevents any definitive allocation of wins based on measured performance. However, the specification fields provide a basis for scenario-based analysis.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G presents a higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which points to an advantage in burst workloads that rely on single-core or lightly threaded performance. Its memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s with DDR5 support, which is more than double the 42.7 GB/s recorded for the Intel part with DDR4 support. Workloads that stress memory throughput, such as data compression, certain scientific computations, or integrated graphics operations, would likely favor the AMD part based on this bandwidth differential. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, which is not recorded for the Intel part, making it suitable for environments where memory error correction is required.

The Intel Core i5-110 holds a base clock of 2.90 GHz, which is 0.90 GHz higher than the AMD part's base clock of 2.00 GHz. For sustained all-core workloads that operate at base frequencies rather than boost frequencies, the Intel part has a recorded specification advantage. The Intel part also carries a larger shared L3 cache of 12 MB, compared to 8 MB for the AMD part. Larger shared cache can benefit workloads with repeated data access patterns across multiple cores, such as database queries or certain server-side processing tasks. The Intel part also lists 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU, whereas the AMD part lists 12 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The Intel part has more lanes, but the AMD part has a newer PCIe generation, meaning each lane carries more bandwidth per lane. The database does not include transfer rate measurements, so the net I/O advantage cannot be quantified.

The integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD part uses Radeon 840M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 630. The database does not record graphics benchmark scores, so no performance comparison can be made. The AMD part's higher memory bandwidth would generally benefit integrated graphics performance, but this remains an inference from specifications, not a measured result.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different architectural generations. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G uses the Gorgon Point codename, which the database places in the "Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)" generation. This indicates a hybrid core layout using both Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, although the database does not specify which cores are which or the count for each type. The process node is 4 nm, manufactured by TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The cache hierarchy for the AMD part is recorded as 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. The L3 is not marked as shared in the database, unlike the Intel part.

The Intel Core i5-110 uses the Comet Lake architecture, which is a 14 nm design manufactured by Intel. The database records a codename of Comet Lake and places it in the "Core i5 (Comet Lake)" generation. The die size is not recorded. The cache hierarchy for the Intel part is 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The L3 is explicitly marked as shared, which is a structural difference from the AMD part's L3 designation.

The memory architecture is a major divergence. The AMD part supports DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 with a dual-channel bus and records a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The AMD part also records ECC memory support, which is absent for the Intel part. The sockets differ entirely: the AMD part uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1200. These sockets are not cross-compatible.

The PCIe interface also differs. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part uses Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics differ in naming, as noted, but the database does not provide details on execution units, clock speeds, or shader counts.

The release dates are recorded differently: the AMD part is dated 2026-03-01, and the Intel part is dated 2025-09-10. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $200, which is stated once here as required by the database format. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two processors in the database:

• Base clock: AMD 2.00 GHz, Intel 2.90 GHz
• Boost clock: AMD 4.80 GHz, Intel 4.30 GHz
• Process node: AMD 4 nm, Intel 14 nm
• Foundry: AMD TSMC, Intel Intel
• Die size: AMD 195 mm², Intel not recorded
• L1 cache per core: AMD 80 KB, Intel 64 KB
• L2 cache per core: AMD 1 MB, Intel 256 KB
• L3 cache: AMD 8 MB, Intel 12 MB (shared)
• Memory support: AMD DDR5, Intel DDR4
• Memory bandwidth: AMD 89.6 GB/s, Intel 42.7 GB/s
• ECC memory: AMD true, Intel false
• PCIe: AMD Gen 4, 12 lanes; Intel Gen 3, 16 lanes
• Integrated graphics: AMD Radeon 840M, Intel UHD Graphics 630
• Socket: AMD Socket AM5, Intel Socket 1200
• Architecture: AMD null (codename Gorgon Point), Intel Comet Lake
• Generation: AMD Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), Intel Core i5 (Comet Lake)
• Release date: AMD 2026-03-01, Intel 2025-09-10
• Launch MSRP: AMD null, Intel $200
• Part number: AMD 100-000001915, Intel SA35X

The cores, threads, TDP, memory bus width, market segment, production status, multiplier unlock status, percentile, and average benchmark score are identical between the two parts. Both are 6 cores, 12 threads, 65 watts, dual-channel memory, desktop segment, active production, locked multiplier, 50th percentile, and zero average benchmark score.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G records a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which is 0.50 GHz higher than the Intel Core i5-110's boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G supports DDR5 with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-110 supports DDR4 with a recorded memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s.

Q: Do both processors have the same core and thread count?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G and the Intel Core i5-110 record 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G records ECC memory support as true. The Intel Core i5-110 records ECC memory support as false.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core i5-110 uses a 14 nm process from Intel.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-110 records 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G records 8 MB of L3 cache.

The Verdict

The data in the database does not include benchmark scores for either processor, so the verdict must rest entirely on recorded specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G offers a higher boost clock, a newer 4 nm process, DDR5 memory support with more than double the memory bandwidth, ECC memory support, and a newer PCIe generation. These specifications point toward workloads that benefit from high burst clocks, memory throughput, and data integrity features. The Intel Core i5-110 offers a higher base clock, a larger shared L3 cache, more CPU PCIe lanes, and a recorded launch MSRP of $200. These specifications point toward sustained all-core operation and workloads with large shared working sets.

For a user selecting between these two, the AMD part appears positioned for modern memory-bound tasks and integrated graphics scenarios, given the Radeon 840M paired with high-bandwidth DDR5. The Intel part appears positioned for applications that stay near base clocks and rely on shared cache capacity. The database records no measured performance outcomes, so neither part can be declared a definitive winner. The choice should follow the workload: AMD for bandwidth-sensitive and ECC-required environments, Intel for cache-heavy and sustained multi-core scenarios. Without benchmark data, the recorded specifications alone must guide the selection.