AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G vs Intel Core i7-14650HX Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G
Core i7-14650HX
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G vs Intel Core i7-14650HX
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Intel Core i7-14650HX holds a decisive advantage across the recorded benchmark suite. The database contains no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G, meaning all head-to-head comparisons derive from the Intel part's measured results and the architectural parameters of each processor. The AMD processor carries an average benchmark score of zero and a percentile ranking of 50, while the Intel processor posts an average benchmark score of 41,576 and sits at the 88th percentile of all CPUs. That 38-point percentile gap places the Intel part in a substantially higher performance tier.
In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 20,454 points. Its single-core score in the same test reaches 1,969 points. The Cinebench R20 results show 11,946 multi-core and 1,686 single-core, while Cinebench R15 delivers 3,470.5 multi-core and 285.5 single-core. Geekbench scores for the Intel part are 14,249 multi-core and 2,173 single-core. PassMark multi-thread results reach 33,495, with single-thread scores at 3,841.
The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G offers no recorded scores in any of these tests, so direct numeric deltas cannot be computed. However, the structural differences in core counts and cache sizes indicate the likely performance separation. The Intel part uses 16 cores and 24 threads, whereas the AMD part uses 6 cores and 12 threads. That difference alone positions the Intel processor far ahead in any multi-threaded workload. The Intel chip also boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the AMD chip reaches 4.80 GHz, giving the Intel part a higher ceiling for single-threaded tasks as well.
The Intel processor's nearest rivals in the database all cluster within a narrow range of its average score. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H is 0.1% behind at 41,621 points. The Intel Core 7 251TE sits 0.2% behind at 41,650 points. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X trails by 0.5% at 41,376 points, and the Intel Core i7-12850HX is 0.5% ahead at 41,779 points. This tight grouping shows the Core i7-14650HX performing in line with other high-end desktop and mobile processors, while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has no comparable entry in the database.
Where Each One Wins
The Core i7-14650HX wins every category for which benchmark data exists. Multi-threaded rendering tasks, represented by Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 scores, heavily favor the Intel part. The 20,454-point Cinebench R23 multi-core result, combined with 33,495 PassMark multi-thread points, indicates strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation workloads. The 16-core, 24-thread configuration provides the parallel throughput needed for these tasks.
Single-thread performance also favors the Intel chip. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,969 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2,173 show competitive per-core speed. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,841 reinforces this. The 5.20 GHz boost clock gives the Intel processor an edge in lightly threaded applications such as legacy software, spreadsheet recalculation, and certain game engines.
The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has no benchmark records in the database, so its wins cannot be quantified. The data does indicate several areas where the AMD part holds architectural advantages that could translate into specific workload benefits. The AMD processor uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, compared to Intel's 10 nm node. Smaller process nodes typically improve power efficiency per transistor. The AMD chip also carries a 65 W TDP versus the Intel part's 55 W TDP, though the AMD processor is classified as a desktop part while the Intel chip is a mobile processor.
Memory bandwidth favors the AMD part. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G supports DDR5 memory with a measured bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but the database lists no memory bandwidth figure for it. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory and uses a dual-channel memory bus, matching the Intel part's dual-channel configuration. The AMD processor's integrated Radeon 840M graphics likely outperform the Intel UHD Graphics 710 in some scenarios, though no benchmark numbers exist to confirm this.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, built on the Zen 5 and Zen 5c architecture and the Gorgon Point codename. The Intel Core i7-14650HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX refresh, part of the Core 14th Gen series.
Core and thread counts differ sharply. The AMD part provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part provides 16 cores and 24 threads. The Intel processor therefore delivers roughly 2.7 times the core count and exactly twice the thread count of the AMD processor. Base clocks are similar: 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.20 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks differ by 0.40 GHz, with the Intel part reaching 5.20 GHz versus the AMD part's 4.80 GHz.
Cache hierarchies show substantial differences. Both processors use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 2 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache diverges significantly: the AMD part has 8 MB total, while the Intel part has 30 MB shared. This 22 MB difference in L3 capacity gives the Intel processor a meaningful advantage in workloads that repeatedly access a large working set, such as database queries and certain scientific simulations.
Process technology sets the two apart in manufacturing terms. AMD uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process at its own foundry. Die sizes differ as well: the AMD chip measures 195 mm², and the Intel chip measures 257 mm². The Intel die is larger by 62 mm², reflecting the higher core count and larger cache. The Intel processor also unlocks its multiplier, allowing overclocking, while the AMD processor does not.
Platform support differs completely. The AMD part uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes. The Intel part uses Intel BGA 1964, a soldered mobile socket, and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel processor's PCIe Gen 5 support provides double the bandwidth per lane compared to the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4, which matters for high-end GPUs and NVMe storage. The AMD part is classified as a desktop processor, while the Intel part is classified as mobile, despite the Intel part's higher performance profile.
Memory support overlaps partially. Both support DDR5, but the Intel processor also supports DDR4. The AMD processor has a documented memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; the Intel processor's bandwidth is not listed. Both support ECC memory. The AMD processor ships with Radeon 840M integrated graphics, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 710. The AMD part was released on 2026-03-01, and the Intel part on 2024-01-07.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX has 16 cores and 24 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: What are the boost clock speeds of the two processors?
A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX boosts to 5.20 GHz. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G boosts to 4.80 GHz.
Q: How does the L3 cache compare between the two?
A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX has 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has 8 MB of L3 cache.
Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?
A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G supports PCIe Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes.
Q: What is the average benchmark score of each processor?
A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX has an average benchmark score of 41,576 and ranks in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has an average benchmark score of 0 and ranks in the 50th percentile.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G and the Intel Core i7-14650HX support ECC memory.
The Verdict
The recorded data places the Intel Core i7-14650HX clearly ahead in every measurable benchmark category. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,454, Geekbench multi-core score of 14,249, and PassMark multi-thread score of 33,495 represent strong performance for a mobile processor. The 88th percentile ranking and average score of 41,576 confirm its position among high-end CPUs, with nearest rivals within 0.5% either direction.
The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G cannot be evaluated on the same terms because the database contains no benchmark scores for it. Its 50th percentile ranking and average score of zero reflect this absence of data rather than a measured performance level. The architectural facts, however, suggest the AMD part targets a different segment. Its 6 cores, 12 threads, and 8 MB L3 cache position it for mainstream workloads, while its 4 nm process, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, and AMD Socket AM5 platform indicate a modern desktop platform.
Users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput, large L3 cache, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity should select the Intel Core i7-14650HX. The data confirms its performance credentials through multiple benchmark suites. Users who prioritize the AMD platform, DDR5 bandwidth, and ECC support may consider the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G, but the database provides no measured performance evidence to support that choice. The Intel processor is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark results, and those results are strong across the board.