AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G vs Intel Core 7 360 Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G and Intel Core 7 360 occupy different design philosophies, with the data revealing a clear split between mobility-focused efficiency and desktop-oriented throughput. The Intel part, a 15-watt mobile processor, ships with a full set of benchmark scores, while the AMD desktop chip, rated at 65 watts, has no recorded benchmark results in the database. This absence of direct measurements for the AMD part shapes the analysis, but the specification sheets and the Intel part's recorded performance against its nearest rivals provide sufficient ground for a comparative breakdown.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 360 is the only contender with recorded benchmark data, and its scores define its win conditions. In multi-threaded workloads, it delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,634, a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5,726, and a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1,374. These figures position it as a capable performer for tasks that scale across cores, such as rendering or compilation, despite its modest 15-watt thermal envelope. Its single-thread results, including a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,924 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,274, indicate strong per-core performance for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has no benchmark entries, so its wins must be inferred from architecture and specifications. It offers 12 threads versus the Intel part's 6 threads, which suggests a theoretical advantage in heavily threaded workloads if its clock speeds hold up. However, without measured scores, the database cannot confirm this advantage. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Intel chip, which gives it a clear win for data-integrity-sensitive applications like server or workstation tasks. Its dual-channel memory bus, with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, exceeds the Intel part's single-channel 59.7 GB/s, indicating a win in memory-bound scenarios. The AMD processor's desktop socket, AM5, also allows for system upgrades without replacing the motherboard, whereas the Intel part is soldered via BGA 1516.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different foundries and process nodes. AMD uses TSMC's 4 nm process for its Gorgon Point chip, which belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. Intel fabricates the Core 7 360 on its own 3 nm process, under the Wildcat Lake codename, part of the Core 5 generation. The process node difference, 4 nm versus 3 nm, implies Intel's chip uses a more advanced lithography, though the AMD part's larger 195 mm² die size suggests a more complex physical layout.

Core and thread counts diverge significantly. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, indicating simultaneous multithreading, while the Intel chip has 6 cores and 6 threads, lacking hyper-threading. Cache hierarchies also differ. AMD allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and an 8 MB L3 cache. Intel provides a larger 192 KB L1 per core, a substantially larger 2.5 MB L2 per core, and a smaller 6 MB shared L3 cache. The L2 difference is notable, as Intel's per-core L2 is 2.5 times larger than AMD's, which can help with frequently accessed data in single-threaded workloads.

Memory support reveals another architectural split. AMD supports only DDR5, with dual-channel access and ECC capability. Intel supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but only in single-channel mode, and without ECC. This makes the AMD part more suited for reliability-critical tasks, while the Intel part's LPDDR5X support targets low-power mobile designs. PCIe connectivity also favors AMD, which provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), versus Intel's Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ as well: AMD uses a Radeon 840M, while Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has 12 threads from 6 cores, while the Intel Core 7 360 has 6 threads from 6 cores. The AMD part's thread count is double that of the Intel chip.

Q: Does the AMD processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 360 does not list ECC support in its specifications.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference?

A: The AMD chip has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 15 watts. This indicates the Intel part is designed for much lower power consumption, typical of mobile processors.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has an 8 MB L3 cache, whereas the Intel Core 7 360 has a 6 MB shared L3 cache. The AMD part offers 2 MB more L3 cache.

Q: What memory types does the Intel processor support?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G supports only DDR5.

Q: Are these processors socketed or soldered?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G uses AMD Socket AM5, a socketed design. The Intel Core 7 360 uses Intel BGA 1516, which is a ball-grid array, typically soldered to the motherboard.

Specification Differences

The two chips differ across nearly every major specification category. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads. Base clocks differ, with the AMD part running at 2.00 GHz and the Intel part at 1.50 GHz, though both boost to 4.80 GHz. TDP is a stark contrast: 65 watts for AMD versus 15 watts for Intel. The AMD chip uses a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel chip uses a 3 nm Intel process. Socket types are entirely different, with AM5 for AMD and BGA 1516 for Intel. Cache configurations differ in L1, L2, and L3 sizes, as detailed previously. Memory support, bus width, bandwidth, and ECC capability all favor AMD, except for Intel's additional LPDDR5X support. PCIe lanes also differ, with AMD offering 12 Gen 4 lanes versus Intel's 6 Gen 4 lanes. The integrated graphics solutions are different brands, Radeon 840M versus Intel Xe3 Graphics. Market segments differ, with AMD classified as Desktop and Intel as Mobile. Release dates are close, with AMD launching on 2026-03-01 and Intel on 2026-04-15. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $426, while the AMD part has no listed launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark results are absent from the database, with no scores recorded for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G and no matching tests for both chips. However, the Intel Core 7 360's recorded scores, when compared to its nearest rivals, provide context for its performance tier. The Intel chip's average benchmark score is 18,374, which places it at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i3-13100, has an average score of 18,380, a delta of 0 percent, meaning the two are statistically identical. The Intel Core 5 330 trails by 0.2 percent with a score of 18,345, the Intel Core i3-14100 trails by 0.3 percent with 18,318, and the Intel Core 3 305 trails by 0.4 percent with 18,302. These deltas are tiny, indicating the Core 7 360 sits in a tightly clustered performance band.

For the AMD part, the lack of benchmarks means no head-to-head wins can be quantified. The database records zero wins for both sides in this pairing. The AMD chip's percentile rank is 50, below the Intel chip's 72, but this percentile is based on no benchmark scores, so it reflects a default position rather than measured performance. The Intel chip's specific scores, such as a PassMark data compression score of 142,877 and a floating point math score of 44,963, show strong throughput in those areas, but without AMD equivalents, a direct comparison is impossible.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear, though lopsided, conclusion. The Intel Core 7 360 is the only processor with measured performance, and its benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,634 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,274, make it a proven performer for its 15-watt mobile class. Its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i3-13100 with a 0 percent delta, confirm it competes at a solid level. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G, with no benchmark data, cannot be validated against the Intel chip in the database. Its specifications, such as 12 threads, dual-channel memory at 89.6 GB/s, ECC support, and a 65-watt TDP, point to a desktop-oriented part that could excel in multi-threaded and reliability-critical tasks, but the absence of scores leaves those claims unverified.

Given the recorded data, the Intel Core 7 360 is the choice for users who need a low-power, mobile processor with confirmed benchmark performance. The AMD part is the pick for those who require a desktop socket, ECC memory, and more threads, but only if they accept that its performance is unmeasured in this database. The 15-watt TDP of the Intel chip versus the 65-watt TDP of the AMD chip highlights the fundamental split: Intel targets efficiency and portability, AMD targets raw capability and expandability. Without AMD benchmark results, the database cannot declare a winner, only a division of roles.