AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G vs Intel Core 7 251E Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G and the Intel Core 7 251E?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 251E has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E boosts to 5.60 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G's boost of 4.80 GHz.

Q: What process nodes do these processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G is built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the Intel Core 7 251E uses Intel's 10 nm process.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G and the Intel Core 7 251E support ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each processor?

A: Both processors have a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the release date of each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E was released on 2025-01-12, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G was released later, on 2026-03-01.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G and Intel Core 7 251E represent fundamentally different architectural approaches from their respective manufacturers. The AMD part, codenamed Gorgon Point, belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. This hybrid design is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel part, codenamed Bartlett Lake, is part of the Core 7 generation and is built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a larger die size of 257 mm².

The core configurations diverge sharply. The AMD processor uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel processor uses 24 cores and 32 threads. This difference in core count is the most significant architectural differentiator between the two. The cache hierarchies also reflect distinct designs. Both processors share an L1 cache of 80 KB per core and an L2 cache of 1 MB per core on the AMD side versus 2 MB per core on the Intel side. The L3 cache differs substantially: the AMD chip has 8 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel chip has 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support also differs. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G supports DDR5 memory only, while the Intel Core 7 251E supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses and achieve the same memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. PCIe connectivity is another point of divergence: the AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), whereas the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ as well, with the AMD part featuring Radeon 840M and the Intel part featuring UHD Graphics 770.

Socket compatibility separates these two processors entirely. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel Core 7 251E uses Intel Socket 1700. Both have a TDP of 65 and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $384. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G and the Intel Core 7 251E. Both processors have an average benchmark score of 0 and hold the same percentile ranking of 50 among all CPUs. Similarly, the wins counters show zero wins for each processor in direct comparisons.

Without direct benchmark data, the specification differences provide the only measurable basis for comparison. The Intel Core 7 251E offers 18 more cores and 20 more threads than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G. This represents a 300% advantage in core count and a 166.7% advantage in thread count. The Intel processor also holds a 0.80 GHz higher boost clock, reaching 5.60 GHz versus 4.80 GHz for the AMD part.

The cache configuration heavily favors the Intel processor. The Intel chip has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is 28 MB more than the AMD chip's 8 MB L3 cache, a 350% difference. The L2 cache per core is also doubled on the Intel side at 2 MB per core versus 1 MB per core on the AMD side.

The AMD processor counters with a more advanced manufacturing process. The 4 nm TSMC node versus Intel's 10 nm process indicates a denser transistor layout, and the AMD die is smaller at 195 mm² compared to 257 mm² for Intel. The AMD chip also supports PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes, whereas the Intel chip supports the newer PCIe Gen 5 standard with 16 lanes, which offers higher bandwidth per lane.

Both processors match on several key metrics. They share the same TDP of 65, the same memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, the same dual-channel memory bus, and identical L1 cache per core at 80 KB. Both support ECC memory and both have locked multipliers. The production status for both is Active, indicating current availability.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G | Intel Core 7 251E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 24 |

| Threads | 12 | 32 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.80 GHz | 5.60 GHz |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 195 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 8 MB | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 12 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Release date | 2026-03-01 | 2025-01-12 |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $384 |

| Part number | 100-000001915 | SRQDUQ657 |

Both processors share a TDP of 65, dual-channel memory bus, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, 80 KB L1 cache per core, ECC memory support, a locked multiplier, Desktop market segment, and Active production status.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 251E dominates in raw parallel processing capacity. With 24 cores and 32 threads, it is positioned for workloads that scale across many threads. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache provides a large pool for frequently accessed data, and the 2 MB L2 cache per core adds further caching depth. The higher boost clock of 5.60 GHz also gives it an edge in lightly threaded tasks that benefit from maximum single-core speed. The support for PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes allows for higher-bandwidth connectivity to compatible devices. The Intel processor also offers flexibility in memory selection with support for both DDR4 and DDR5.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G wins on manufacturing efficiency. The 4 nm TSMC process represents a more advanced fabrication node compared to Intel's 10 nm process, which typically indicates better power efficiency per transistor. The smaller die size of 195 mm² versus 257 mm² suggests a more compact implementation. The AMD processor's 12 PCIe Gen 4 lanes may be sufficient for systems that do not require the bandwidth of Gen 5. Its Radeon 840M integrated graphics differ from Intel's UHD Graphics 770, and the AMD part uses the newer AMD Socket AM5 platform, which offers a distinct upgrade path compared to Intel Socket 1700.

The data shows a clear division: the Intel Core 7 251E is oriented toward heavy multi-threaded computing with its massive core count and large cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G is a more modest 6-core desktop processor built on a leading-edge process. The absence of recorded benchmark scores means the relative real-world performance cannot be quantified from the database at this time. The percentile ranking of 50 for both processors indicates they sit at the median of all CPUs in the database, though this metric does not account for their substantial architectural differences. The Intel part's earlier release date of 2025-01-12 and its recorded launch MSRP of $384 provide additional context, while the AMD part's release date of 2026-03-01 and lack of recorded launch MSRP leave its positioning less defined in the database.