AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G against the Intel Core 3 201TE. The `headToHeadBenchmarks` field is empty, and the `winsA` and `winsB` counts are both zero. Without measured scores, a comparison of raw performance must rely on the architectural specifications and the recorded percentile placement, which is identical for both parts at the 50th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

What the data does show is that neither processor has a published average benchmark score, and neither lists any nearest rivals. The absence of benchmark data means no percentage deltas can be cited. The comparison below therefore focuses on what the recorded specifications imply, using only the fields present in the database.

The AMD part offers a higher boost clock at 4.80 GHz versus 4.60 GHz for the Intel chip, a 0.20 GHz advantage on paper. The Intel part has a higher base clock at 2.90 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, a 0.90 GHz lead in sustained all-core operation. These figures indicate different design targets: the AMD processor leans on boost headroom, while the Intel processor relies on a stronger baseline frequency.

In terms of core count, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G provides 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 3 201TE provides 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD chip delivers 50% more cores and 50% more threads. For multi-threaded workloads that scale with core count, the recorded specifications suggest a clear advantage for the AMD part, though no benchmark score confirms this.

Single-thread performance is harder to infer. The AMD boost clock is higher by 0.20 GHz, but the Intel base clock is higher by 0.90 GHz. The database does not include per-core boost behavior or thermal limits, so the actual sustained frequencies remain unknown.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers, nodes, and codenames. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G uses the Gorgon Point codename with a generation labeled "Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)". It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename with a generation labeled "Core 3 (Bartlett Lake)". It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The process node difference is substantial: 4 nm versus 10 nm, which typically indicates a significant efficiency and density gap, though the database records no transistor counts to quantify this.

The AMD chip has a die size of 195 mm². The Intel chip has a die size of 163 mm². Despite the smaller process node, the AMD die is larger by 32 mm², likely due to the higher core count and integrated graphics complexity.

Cache layouts differ notably. Both parts use 80 KB of L1 per core. For L2, the AMD processor has 1 MB per core, while the Intel processor has 1.25 MB per core. The Intel chip has a higher per-core L2 allocation by 0.25 MB. For L3, the AMD processor has 8 MB, while the Intel processor has 12 MB shared. The Intel chip holds a 4 MB advantage in total L3 cache.

Memory support differs in scope. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with a recorded bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s for its memory configuration. The AMD part shows a 12.8 GB/s higher memory bandwidth figure, but the Intel part offers broader memory compatibility.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU. The Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part provides both a newer PCIe generation and four additional lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G uses a Radeon 840M. The Intel Core 3 201TE uses UHD Graphics 730. The database records no benchmark scores for either iGPU, so no performance comparison is possible.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM5. The Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. Neither socket is interchangeable, so the motherboard selection is fixed by the processor choice.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded specifications, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G holds advantages in core count, thread count, boost clock, memory bandwidth, and process node. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration gives it a structural edge for parallel workloads such as compilation, rendering, or heavy multitasking, wherever software scales beyond four cores. The higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz could benefit bursty single-thread tasks, assuming the silicon can sustain that frequency under load. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth also supports memory-intensive operations better than the Intel part's 76.8 GB/s.

The Intel Core 3 201TE counters with a higher base clock of 2.90 GHz, which suggests stronger sustained all-core performance at its rated 45 W TDP, at least on paper. The larger L3 cache of 12 MB versus 8 MB could help workloads with large working sets that fit in cache, reducing main memory traffic. The Intel part also supports DDR4 in addition to DDR5, which matters for users reusing existing DDR4 modules. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes provides more headroom for high-bandwidth peripherals such as modern GPUs or NVMe storage, compared to the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes.

The TDP figures differ as well. The AMD processor is rated at 65 W, while the Intel processor is rated at 45 W. The lower TDP for the Intel part suggests it may fit into more modest cooling solutions and lower-power system builds, although actual power draw under load is not recorded.

The Verdict

The data shows two processors aimed at different priorities. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G offers more cores, more threads, a higher boost clock, higher memory bandwidth, and a more advanced 4 nm process node. The Intel Core 3 201TE offers a higher base clock, more L3 cache, broader memory support, PCIe Gen 5, and a lower TDP.

For multi-threaded workloads, the AMD part has the structural advantage on paper: 6 cores and 12 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads. The 50% core and thread advantage should translate into measurable wins in software that uses more than four cores, though the database has no benchmark scores to confirm this.

For single-threaded or lightly threaded workloads, the comparison is closer. The AMD boost clock is 0.20 GHz higher, but the Intel base clock is 0.90 GHz higher. Without measured boost behavior, the sustained frequency advantage is unclear. The Intel part's larger 12 MB L3 cache could also reduce latency for cache-resident data.

For system flexibility, the Intel part wins. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5, offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and has a lower 45 W TDP. The AMD part requires DDR5 and offers PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes, which constrains platform choices.

The database records identical percentile placement at 50 for both CPUs, and no benchmark scores exist for either. This means the verdict rests entirely on specifications. Users who prioritize core count, thread count, and memory bandwidth should look to the AMD processor. Users who prioritize base clock, cache size, memory compatibility, PCIe generation, and lower TDP should look to the Intel processor.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD part has 2 more cores and 4 more threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the Intel Core 3 201TE boosts to 4.60 GHz. The AMD part is higher by 0.20 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G supports DDR5 only.

Q: How do the L3 cache sizes compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 3 201TE has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 4 MB more.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has a TDP of 65 W. The Intel Core 3 201TE has a TDP of 45 W. The Intel part is rated 20 W lower.

Q: Which processor uses PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G uses PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G | Intel Core 3 201TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 4 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | True | True |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 12 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2026-03-01 | 2025-01-12 |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $134 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | False | False |

| Part Number | 100-000001915 | SRPKDQ5CK |