AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no benchmark scores for either the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G or the Intel Arc G3. The recorded measurements show zero wins for each processor in head-to-head comparisons, and the average benchmark score for both parts is zero. This absence of data means no numerical performance deltas can be established between the two processors from the recorded measurements. The percentile ranking against all CPUs is identical for both, at the 50th percentile, which places each processor at the midpoint of the database distribution despite the lack of direct scoring.

Both processors show an empty nearest rivals list, so no comparative deltas against specific competitor models are available. The data indicates that neither part has generated measurable benchmark results in the current database state. Consequently, any performance assessment must rely on architectural characteristics, core configurations, and memory subsystem specifications, rather than direct workload measurements.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G uses a 4 nm process node manufactured by TSMC, while the Intel Arc G3 uses a 3 nm node fabricated by Intel. The AMD part carries the codename Gorgon Point and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation built on the Zen 5 and Zen 5c core architectures. The Intel part carries the codename Panther Lake and belongs to the Arc G3 generation.

Core counts differ substantially. The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, indicating simultaneous multithreading. The Intel processor has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning it does not employ multithreading and each core maps to a single thread. The AMD chip offers a base clock of 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Intel chip has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Cache layouts differ in capacity and organization. The AMD processor provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor provides 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part therefore carries more cache at every level, with the L3 cache more than double the AMD allocation.

Memory support diverges by type and bandwidth. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel bus with a recorded bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, which is approximately 52% higher than the AMD figure. ECC memory support is present on the AMD part but absent on the Intel part.

The thermal envelope differs notably. The AMD processor has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 25 watts. This indicates the Intel part is designed for a lower power draw, consistent with its mobile market segment.

Platform integration differs by socket and expansion. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM5 and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU. The Intel processor uses Intel BGA 2540 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation but fewer lanes.

Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD processor includes Radeon 840M graphics, while the Intel processor includes Arc B370 graphics. Both are integrated solutions, but they come from different vendors and product families.

Production status is active for both processors. The AMD part has a release date in March 2026, while the Intel part has a release date in May 2026, making the Intel part the later introduction. The AMD part has a part number of 100-000001915, and the Intel part has a part number of SA4QZ. Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded in the database. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc G3 holds advantages in core count, cache capacity, memory bandwidth, process node, and power efficiency. Its 14 cores exceed the AMD part by 8 cores, and its 18 MB of shared L3 cache more than doubles the AMD 8 MB L3 allocation. The 136.5 GB/s memory bandwidth is the higher recorded figure between the two, and the 3 nm process node is one step smaller than the 4 nm node used by AMD. The 25 watt TDP is dramatically lower than the 65 watt AMD figure, which positions the Intel part for thermally constrained environments.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G counters with thread-level parallelism advantages, higher clock speeds, ECC support, and a desktop-oriented platform. Its 12 threads from 6 cores provide a 2:1 thread-to-core ratio, whereas the Intel part offers a 1:1 ratio. The AMD boost clock of 4.80 GHz is 200 MHz higher than the Intel boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and the base clock of 2.00 GHz is 100 MHz higher than the Intel base clock of 1.90 GHz. ECC memory support is exclusive to the AMD part, which matters for data integrity workloads.

The socket and PCIe configuration give each processor a different deployment target. The AMD part uses a socketed AM5 platform with 12 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which suits upgradeable desktop systems. The Intel part uses a soldered BGA 2540 package with 4 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which suits compact mobile designs where the processor is permanently attached to the board.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has 6 cores.

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has 12 threads from 6 cores, while the Intel Arc G3 has 14 threads from 14 cores. The AMD part uses simultaneous multithreading, while the Intel part does not.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has a memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G supports ECC memory. The Intel Arc G3 does not.

Q: What are the TDP values for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has a TDP of 65 watts, and the Intel Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 watts.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has 18 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G has 8 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What process nodes are used by these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, and the Intel Arc G3 uses a 3 nm process from Intel.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G | Intel Arc G3 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 14 |

| Threads | 12 | 14 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 25 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 2540 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Panther Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Arc G3 (Panther Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 136.5 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 12 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 4 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | Arc B370 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | March 2026 | May 2026 |

| Part Number | 100-000001915 | SA4QZ |

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear split by market segment. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440G is a desktop processor on a socketed AM5 platform with ECC memory support, a higher boost clock, and a higher TDP of 65 watts. It is suited for systems where socketed upgrades, data integrity features, and higher single-thread boost frequencies are priorities. The Intel Arc G3 is a mobile processor on a soldered BGA 2540 package with a much lower TDP of 25 watts, a smaller 3 nm process node, more cores, more cache, and higher memory bandwidth. It is suited for thermally constrained portable systems where power draw is the limiting factor.

Direct performance comparisons cannot be drawn because the database contains no benchmark scores for either processor. The architecture differences point to distinct strengths: the Intel part offers a higher core count and larger cache pool, while the AMD part offers multithreading and ECC support. The Intel part also provides a newer PCIe generation and a more advanced process node, whereas the AMD part provides more PCIe lanes and a higher clock ceiling. Buyers should select based on the platform requirements and workload characteristics described in the specification data, since no measured performance results are available to rank these processors numerically.