AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs Intel Core 7 250H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and the Intel Core 7 250H are both mobile processors aimed at professional laptops, but they approach performance from entirely different design philosophies. The Intel part dominates every benchmark in this comparison, but the AMD chip counters with dramatically better power efficiency and a modern manufacturing process. The data shows a clear trade-off: raw throughput versus sustained capability in a constrained thermal envelope.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results are unambiguous. The Intel Core 7 250H wins all eleven head-to-head measurements, with no wins recorded for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435. The Intel processor’s advantage is most pronounced in workloads that scale with core count and raw compute throughput. The largest margins appear in prime number finding, physics simulation, and floating-point math, where the Intel part leads by 46.2%, 45.4%, and 36.8% respectively. These are heavily parallel workloads that benefit from the Intel chip’s 14 cores and 20 threads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 does not win any category, but its competitive positioning is not about benchmark victories. The AMD chip’s wins come in the form of a 28 W TDP versus the Intel’s 45 W TDP. For a laptop chassis, this difference dictates cooling requirements, battery life, and sustained performance under load. The AMD processor also uses a 4 nm TSMC process node versus Intel’s 10 nm node, which translates to a significant efficiency advantage. While the Intel chip produces higher scores, the AMD chip delivers a usable level of performance at a fraction of the power draw, making it a better fit for thin-and-light professional notebooks.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from contrasting design lineages. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is built on the Zen 5 architecture, using the Gorgon Point codename and belonging to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation. It is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The chip is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, giving it a transistor density advantage over the Intel part. Its cache layout consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus, with a measured memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory and uses a PCIe Gen 4 interface with 14 lanes from the CPU.

The Intel Core 7 250H is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H variant from the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. It is a 14-core, 20-thread processor with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The chip is fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process. Its cache hierarchy is larger: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers DDR4 and DDR5, also over a dual-channel bus, but the database does not record a memory bandwidth figure for the Intel part. ECC memory is not supported. The Intel chip uses a PCIe Gen 5 interface with 8 lanes from the CPU, which offers higher per-lane bandwidth than the AMD part’s Gen 4 implementation.

The integrated graphics also differ. The AMD chip uses a Radeon 840M, while the Intel part uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. Both are mobile iGPUs, but the database does not provide comparative graphics benchmarks. The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $502; the AMD processor has no recorded launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 7 250H wins every measured test, and the margins are substantial in compute-heavy tasks. In the PassMark multithread test, the Intel chip scores 27030 against the AMD’s 19091, a 29.4% advantage. The single-thread test shows a smaller gap: Intel scores 4148 versus AMD’s 3757, a 9.4% lead. This suggests the Intel chip has both superior multicore scaling and a higher per-core performance ceiling.

The largest deltas appear in specific math workloads. In floating-point math, Intel scores 65094 versus AMD’s 41114, a 36.8% lead. Integer math shows Intel at 99100 versus AMD’s 60879, a 38.6% lead. Prime number finding is the most lopsided result: Intel scores 106 versus AMD’s 57, a 46.2% gap. Physics simulation follows closely, with Intel at 1824 versus AMD’s 995, a 45.4% difference. These results indicate that the Intel chip’s higher core count and clock speeds translate directly into heavy parallel compute wins.

Data-oriented tasks also favor Intel, though by smaller margins. Data compression sees Intel at 303269 versus AMD’s 232803, a 23.2% lead. Data encryption shows Intel at 18206 versus AMD’s 11267, a 38.1% lead. Random string sorting has Intel at 34136 versus AMD’s 24936, a 27% lead. Extended instructions are nearly tied: Intel scores 17318 versus AMD’s 16724, a 3.4% lead, which is the closest result in the entire comparison.

The average benchmark scores reflect the overall picture. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 records an average benchmark score of 37762 and sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 250H records an average of 35728 and sits in the 85th percentile. Despite losing every head-to-head test, the AMD chip actually has a higher average score than the Intel chip. This is because the AMD part’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (avg score 37904, delta -0.4%) and the Intel Core i5-13600K (avg score 37685, delta 0.2%), while the Intel chip’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X (avg score 35909, delta -0.5%) and the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (avg score 35670, delta 0.2%). The AMD part’s percentile ranking is also one point higher, indicating that its overall standing in the database is slightly better despite the head-to-head sweep.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD chip has a TDP of 28 W, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 45 W. The AMD part consumes 17 W less at the rated TDP.

Q: Which chip has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 boosts to 4.50 GHz.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The Intel chip has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD chip has 4 MB of L3 cache.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 250H does not.

Q: What is the single-thread performance gap?

A: The Intel chip scores 4148 in the PassMark single-thread test versus the AMD’s 3757, giving Intel a 9.4% lead.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on use case. The Intel Core 7 250H is the outright performance winner. It wins every single benchmark in the comparison, with leads ranging from 3.4% in extended instructions to 46.2% in prime number finding. For workloads that demand maximum throughput, such as rendering, physics simulation, or heavy math processing, the Intel chip delivers substantially higher scores. Its 14 cores, 20 threads, higher boost clock, and larger L3 cache all contribute to this result.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is the efficiency pick. Its 28 W TDP is 37.8% lower than the Intel’s 45 W TDP, which is a decisive factor for laptop design. The 4 nm TSMC process node gives it a manufacturing advantage that translates into lower power draw and reduced heat output. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory and offers more PCIe lanes (14 versus 8), though on an older Gen 4 standard versus Intel’s Gen 5. Its higher average benchmark score (37762 versus 35728) and higher percentile ranking (86th versus 85th) suggest that its overall standing in the database is not diminished by the head-to-head sweep.

The choice depends on the machine’s purpose. A workstation-class laptop with active cooling and a large battery can use the Intel chip’s extra performance. A thin-and-light professional notebook that prioritizes battery life and quiet operation would be better served by the AMD chip. The Intel part costs $502 at launch MSRP, which is a notable factor for system pricing. The AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP, but its lower TDP and modern process node imply a different cost structure. Neither chip is unlocked for overclocking, and both are active production parts. The Intel chip is already released (December 2024), while the AMD chip is dated January 2026 in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 | Intel Core 7 250H |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 6 | 14 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-H |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe Version | Gen 4 | Gen 5 |

| PCIe Lanes (CPU) | 14 | 8 |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $502 |

| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-12-17 |