AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 are both 6-core, 12-thread mobile processors built on the same Zen 5 architecture and 4 nm TSMC process. They share identical cache hierarchies, memory support, integrated graphics, and a 28 W TDP. The recorded benchmark data, however, shows a clear and consistent performance separation, with the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 leading across every measured workload despite its lower 4.50 GHz boost clock compared to the 4.60 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 445.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records 11 direct comparisons between these two processors, and the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 wins all 11. The largest margin appears in data compression, where the PRO 435 scores 232,803 against 215,812 for the AI 7 445, a 7.9% advantage. This is a substantial lead for a workload that stresses memory bandwidth and cache efficiency, suggesting the PRO 435 extracts more useful throughput from identical hardware resources.

Random string sorting follows closely, with the PRO 435 at 24,936 versus 23,488, a 6.2% gap. Data encryption shows a 7.1% difference, with scores of 11,267 and 10,519 respectively. These three workloads, compression, sorting, and encryption, are all heavily dependent on data movement and integer throughput, and the PRO 435 consistently delivers more work per clock.

The single-thread results also favor the PRO 435, with a score of 3,757 compared to 3,591, a 4.6% edge. This is notable because the AI 7 445 has a higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz versus 4.50 GHz. The benchmark data indicates that the PRO 435 achieves higher single-core performance despite the lower rated boost frequency, which points to differences in silicon quality or power management behavior rather than raw clock speed.

In multithreaded workloads, the PRO 435 scores 19,091 against 18,115, a 5.4% lead. The extended instructions test shows a 5.7% margin, with 16,724 versus 15,826. Floating point math results in a 4.5% advantage, 41,114 versus 39,362, while integer math shows a 4.4% gap, 60,879 versus 58,332. The smallest margins are in prime number finding, 57 versus 56, a 1.8% difference, and physics, 995 versus 976, a 1.9% difference. Even in these lighter workloads, the PRO 435 holds the lead.

The average benchmark score reinforces this pattern. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 averages 37,762 across all recorded tests, while the Ryzen AI 7 445 averages 26,936. That difference is driven largely by the additional Cinebench results recorded for the AI 7 445, which are not present for the PRO 435. The Cinebench R23 multicore score for the AI 7 445 is 10,590, and the single-core score is 1,806. These results are not directly comparable to the PassMark suite, but they do provide context for the AI 7 445's overall position.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 wins every benchmark category recorded in the head-to-head data. There is no workload in the database where the Ryzen AI 7 445 takes a lead. This makes the use-case split straightforward: the PRO 435 is the stronger choice for all measured scenarios.

For productivity tasks that involve data manipulation, such as file compression, encryption, and sorting large datasets, the PRO 435 offers margins between 6.2% and 7.9%. These workloads are common in office environments, database operations, and content preparation. The PRO 435 also leads in general-purpose computing, as evidenced by its single-thread and multithread PassMark scores.

The AI 7 445, while slower in every recorded test, still delivers respectable absolute numbers. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10,590 and single-core score of 1,806 indicate a capable processor for everyday mobile use. In the database's percentile rankings, the AI 7 445 sits at the 79th percentile versus all CPUs, while the PRO 435 sits at the 86th percentile. That 7-point gap in percentile placement reflects the consistent, if modest, performance advantage of the PRO 435.

The nearest rivals for each processor confirm their respective positions. The PRO 435's average score of 37,762 places it within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, a higher-tier processor, and within 0.2% of the Intel Core i5-13600K, a desktop part. The AI 7 445's average score of 26,936 sits within 0.6% of the Intel Core i9-9900K and within 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-1370P. This means the PRO 435 competes with a different performance class than the AI 7 445, despite their near-identical specifications.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same Zen 5 architecture and are built on TSMC's 4 nm process node. The codename for both is Gorgon Point, and both use the AMD Socket FP8. The core configuration is identical: 6 cores, 12 threads, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of L3 cache total. Memory support is also the same, with DDR5 and LPDDR5X, dual-channel bus, and 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. Both support ECC memory and PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes for the CPU.

The integrated graphics are identical as well, with both featuring the Radeon 840M. The TDP is 28 W for both parts, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The only specification difference recorded is the boost clock: 4.50 GHz for the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and 4.60 GHz for the Ryzen AI 7 445. The base clock is 2.00 GHz for both.

The part numbers differ, with the PRO 435 using 100-000001788 and the AI 7 445 using 100-000001935. The generation label also differs slightly: the PRO 435 is listed under "Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)" while the AI 7 445 is listed under "Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)". This naming difference does not correspond to any architectural change in the recorded data.

Since the architecture, process node, cache, memory, and graphics are all identical, the performance gap must come from other factors. The higher boost clock on the AI 7 445 does not translate into higher benchmark scores. The data suggests that the PRO 435 may have more favorable power delivery or silicon binning, allowing it to sustain higher effective clock speeds under load despite its lower rated boost.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: Do both processors have the same number of cores and threads?

A: Yes, both have 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor performs better in single-threaded benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 3,757 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the Ryzen AI 7 445 scores 3,591, a 4.6% advantage for the PRO 435.

Q: Are the integrated graphics different between the two?

A: No, both use the Radeon 840M integrated graphics.

Q: What is the TDP for both processors?

A: Both have a TDP of 28 W.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has an average benchmark score of 37,762. The Ryzen AI 7 445 has an average score of 26,936. The PRO 435 also sits at the 86th percentile versus all CPUs, compared to the 79th percentile for the AI 7 445.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 outperforms the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 in every benchmark recorded. For users who prioritize raw computational throughput, the PRO 435 is the stronger processor. It delivers between 1.8% and 7.9% higher scores across the PassMark suite, with the largest gains in data-intensive workloads like compression and encryption.

The AI 7 445 offers a higher boost clock on paper, but the measured results show that this does not translate into real-world performance gains. The PRO 435 achieves higher single-thread and multithread scores, which indicates better sustained performance under typical mobile workloads.

The percentile rankings reinforce this conclusion. The PRO 435 sits at the 86th percentile versus all CPUs, placing it in a different competitive tier than the AI 7 445 at the 79th percentile. The nearest rivals for each processor confirm this: the PRO 435 trades blows with the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and the Intel Core i5-13600K, while the AI 7 445 lines up with the Intel Core i7-1370P and the Ryzen 5 7545U.

For a mobile system where performance matters, the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is the clear choice based on the recorded data. The AI 7 445 is not a poor processor, but it is consistently slower in every measured category, and there is no workload in the database where it offers an advantage.

Specification Differences

The two processors share nearly all specifications. The only recorded differences are the boost clock, the part number, and the generation label. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, while the Ryzen AI 7 445 has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The PRO 435 uses part number 100-000001788 and is listed under the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation. The AI 7 445 uses part number 100-000001935 and is listed under the Ryzen AI 400 generation. All other fields, including cores, threads, base clock, TDP, socket, architecture, process node, cache, memory support, ECC support, PCIe lanes, and integrated graphics, are identical.