AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 shows a substantial performance advantage over the Intel Core i5-110 across every measurable workload. The Intel Core i5-110 has no benchmark scores listed in the database, and the head-to-head comparison table is empty. This means the analysis must rely entirely on the AMD processor's absolute scores and its percentile ranking against the broader CPU pool.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 achieves a multi-threaded score of 18,115 in PassMark, a single-thread score of 3,591, and a Cinebench R23 multicore result of 10,590. These figures place the chip at the 79th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-1370P with an average score of 26,900 (0.1% difference), the AMD Ryzen 5 7545U at 26,849 (0.3% difference), the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G at 27,051 (0.4% behind), and the Intel Core i9-9900K at 27,097 (0.6% behind). The Ryzen AI 7 445 sits approximately in the middle of this cluster, slightly ahead of the i7-1370P and Ryzen 5 7545U, slightly behind the Ryzen 7 5700G and i9-9900K.

The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 26,936. This number is a useful reference point because it aggregates all the individual test results into a single metric. The Intel Core i5-110, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of zero and a 50th percentile ranking, indicating that no performance data has been recorded for it in the database. Consequently, every quantitative comparison in this analysis is one-sided: the Ryzen AI 7 445 has measurable results, while the i5-110 does not.

In specific workloads, the Ryzen AI 7 445 shows particular strength in integer math with a PassMark score of 58,332, floating point math at 39,362, and extended instructions at 15,826. The data encryption score of 10,519 and data compression score of 215,812 round out the productivity-oriented tests. The physics score is 976, and the random string sorting test yields 23,488. The prime number search test, which often reflects raw integer throughput, returns a modest 56. These figures collectively indicate a processor that handles general-purpose computing tasks with high efficiency, especially in multi-threaded scenarios, but the lack of any Intel data prevents a direct head-to-head delta calculation.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is significant, spanning process technology, core design, and platform features. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-110 relies on Intel's 14 nm process. This difference in manufacturing technology is a primary driver of the efficiency and performance characteristics of each chip.

The AMD processor is built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically the Gorgon Point codename, and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel part uses the older Comet Lake architecture, a derivative of Skylake, and belongs to the Core i5 generation. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, as does the Intel chip, but the core designs are generations apart. AMD's Zen 5 features a larger L1 cache at 80 KB per core and a larger L2 cache at 1 MB per core, compared to Intel's 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core. The L3 cache configuration also differs: AMD uses a 4 MB L3 cache, while Intel uses a much larger 12 MB shared L3 cache.

Memory support further separates the two. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-110 supports only DDR4, also dual-channel, with a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. This is more than a 2x difference in theoretical bandwidth. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory, while the Intel part does not. PCIe connectivity differs as well: AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), whereas Intel provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

The integrated graphics solutions are also from different eras. AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses the UHD Graphics 630. The market segments differ, with AMD positioned as a mobile processor on the AMD Socket FP8, and Intel positioned as a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1200. The AMD chip has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 65 watts, reflecting the mobile versus desktop design targets. The release dates differ as well, with the AMD part dated January 2026 and the Intel part dated September 2025, though both are listed as active in production.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-110 has a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The AMD part also has a lower base clock at 2.00 GHz versus 2.90 GHz for the Intel chip.

Q: How do the two processors compare in terms of memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-110 supports DDR4 with a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The AMD chip offers more than twice the theoretical bandwidth.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i5-110 is manufactured on a 14 nm process by Intel. This is a substantial generational gap in manufacturing technology.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-110 has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has 4 MB of L3 cache. Intel has three times the L3 capacity, although the AMD chip has larger L1 and L2 caches per core.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-110 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 sits at the 79th percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i5-110 sits at the 50th percentile, though it has no recorded benchmark scores, so this ranking reflects the absence of data rather than measured performance.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 and the Intel Core i5-110:

• Base clock: 2.00 GHz (AMD) versus 2.90 GHz (Intel)
• Boost clock: 4.60 GHz (AMD) versus 4.30 GHz (Intel)
• TDP: 28 watts (AMD) versus 65 watts (Intel)
• Socket: AMD Socket FP8 (AMD) versus Intel Socket 1200 (Intel)
• Architecture: Zen 5 (AMD) versus Comet Lake (Intel)
• Codename: Gorgon Point (AMD) versus Comet Lake (Intel)
• Generation: Ryzen AI 400, Zen 5 / Zen 5c (AMD) versus Core i5, Comet Lake (Intel)
• Process node: 4 nm (AMD) versus 14 nm (Intel)
• Foundry: TSMC (AMD) versus Intel (Intel)
• L1 cache: 80 KB per core (AMD) versus 64 KB per core (Intel)
• L2 cache: 1 MB per core (AMD) versus 256 KB per core (Intel)
• L3 cache: 4 MB (AMD) versus 12 MB shared (Intel)
• Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X (AMD) versus DDR4 (Intel)
• Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s (AMD) versus 42.7 GB/s (Intel)
• ECC memory: Supported (AMD) versus not supported (Intel)
• PCIe: Gen 4, 14 lanes (AMD) versus Gen 3, 16 lanes (Intel)
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 840M (AMD) versus UHD Graphics 630 (Intel)
• Market segment: Mobile (AMD) versus Desktop (Intel)
• Release date: January 2026 (AMD) versus September 2025 (Intel)
• Part number: 100-000001935 (AMD) versus SA35X (Intel)
• Launch MSRP: $200 (Intel only; AMD has no recorded MSRP)

The Verdict

The database contains complete benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 but none for the Intel Core i5-110. This asymmetry is the central finding. The AMD processor has an average benchmark score of 26,936 and a 79th percentile ranking, with strong multi-threaded and single-threaded results across Cinebench and PassMark tests. The Intel Core i5-110 has no recorded scores, an average benchmark score of zero, and a 50th percentile ranking that reflects missing data rather than measured performance.

Given this data gap, the Ryzen AI 7 445 is the only processor in this comparison with verifiable performance characteristics. It delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10,590 and a single-core score of 1,806, along with a PassMark multi-thread score of 18,115 and a single-thread score of 3,591. Its nearest rivals, all with average scores within 0.6% of its own, confirm that it competes with higher-tier desktop and mobile parts from both AMD and Intel. The Intel Core i5-110, lacking any benchmark entries, cannot be positioned relative to these results.

The architectural data supports the performance picture. The AMD chip uses a 4 nm process, newer Zen 5 cores, faster memory support, and a lower 28-watt TDP, all of which point toward higher efficiency and modern platform features. The Intel chip uses a 14 nm process, older Comet Lake cores, DDR4 memory, and a 65-watt TDP, which places it in an older desktop performance bracket. While the Intel part offers a larger L3 cache and a higher base clock, these specifications do not translate into recorded benchmark wins in the database. The verdict is clear: the Ryzen AI 7 445 is the only chip with measurable performance data, and that data places it firmly in the upper tier of the database.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 wins in every category where benchmark data exists. Its multi-threaded performance, as shown by the 18,115 PassMark multi-thread score and the 10,590 Cinebench R23 multicore result, makes it suitable for heavily parallel workloads such as rendering, compilation, and data processing. Its single-thread score of 3,591 in PassMark and 1,806 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong responsiveness for everyday applications and lightly threaded tasks. The 79th percentile ranking confirms broad competitiveness against the entire CPU database.

The Intel Core i5-110 has no recorded wins in the database because it has no recorded benchmark scores. It does, however, hold advantages in certain specification fields. Its 2.90 GHz base clock is higher than the AMD chip's 2.00 GHz, which could imply better sustained performance in short, single-threaded bursts, though no test data supports this. Its 12 MB shared L3 cache is three times larger than the AMD chip's 4 MB, which may benefit certain cache-sensitive workloads. Its 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes offer two more lanes than the AMD chip's 14 Gen 4 lanes, though the newer Gen 4 standard transfers more data per lane. Its desktop socket and 65-watt TDP suggest it is designed for stationary systems with less stringent power constraints.

The use-case split is therefore straightforward. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 is the choice for any workload where measured performance matters, including multi-threaded productivity, content creation, and general mobile computing, given its mobile market segment and 28-watt TDP. The Intel Core i5-110 is a desktop part with a higher base clock and more L3 cache, but without any benchmark data, it cannot be recommended for specific tasks based on performance evidence. The data supports the AMD processor for all quantifiable use cases, while the Intel processor remains an unmeasured alternative with only specification-level differences to distinguish it.