AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a decisive picture. The Intel Core i5-14490F wins all 15 recorded head-to-head comparisons, leaving the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 without a single victory. The magnitude of the Intel lead varies significantly by workload, ranging from a narrow 4.9% edge in single-threaded tests to a 65.3% gap in physics processing.

The most pronounced advantage appears in multi-core workloads. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Intel chip scores 23000 against the AMD's 8130, a delta of -64.7% from the AMD perspective. Cinebench R15 multicore tells a similar story, with Intel at 2318 versus AMD at 1195, a 48.4% difference. The PassMark multithread test shows Intel at 28662 against 13320, a 53.5% gap. These results align with the core configuration, but the scale of the difference exceeds what core count alone would predict.

Single-core performance is far closer. The PassMark single-thread test shows Intel at 3873 versus AMD at 3683, only a 4.9% difference. Cinebench R23 single-core shows a larger gap, with Intel at 3247 and AMD at 1797, a 44.7% delta. Cinebench R15 single-core records Intel at 327 and AMD at 269, a 17.7% difference. The variance between these tests suggests the AMD chip's single-core efficiency is workload dependent, competitive in some scenarios but clearly behind in others.

Encryption and compression workloads heavily favor Intel. PassMark data encryption shows Intel at 18225 versus AMD at 7591, a 58.3% gap. Data compression records Intel at 340026 against 158912, a 53.3% difference. Integer math follows the same pattern, with Intel at 87844 and AMD at 39637, a 54.9% delta. Floating point math shows Intel at 66558 versus 27193, a 59.1% gap. The physics test delivers the largest proportional difference, with Intel at 2093 and AMD at 726, a 65.3% margin.

Random string sorting, extended instructions, and prime number finding all show Intel advantages between 47.3% and 63.9%. The extended instructions test records Intel at 21731 versus AMD at 11455, a 47.3% gap. Prime number finding shows Intel at 122 against 44, a 63.9% delta. Random string sorting has Intel at 35608 versus 16623, a 53.3% difference.

The average benchmark scores place the Intel processor at 38149, which sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The AMD chip averages 19617, placing it at the 73rd percentile. The Intel processor's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, Intel Core i5-13600KF, AMD Ryzen 7 250, and Intel Core i5-13600HX, all within 0.3% of its average score. The AMD chip's nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 5 5500, Intel Core i5-12500, Intel Core i5-11600KF, and Intel Core i7-10700F, with deltas ranging from -0.5% to 0.6%. These peer groups illustrate the performance class separation between the two processors.

Architecture Differences

The two processors occupy different architectural generations, process nodes, and market segments. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process. The Intel Core i5-14490F belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, and is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm².

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD chip has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel chip has 10 cores and 16 threads. Both use an 80 KB L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs, with AMD at 1 MB per core and Intel at 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a major divergence: the AMD processor has 4 MB total, while the Intel processor has 24 MB shared. This cache disparity likely contributes to the Intel chip's advantage in data-heavy workloads.

Memory support differs in scope. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with no bandwidth figure recorded in the database. ECC memory is supported by the AMD chip but not by the Intel chip.

PCIe capabilities favor Intel. The AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU. The Intel processor provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, offering both a newer standard and more lanes.

Integrated graphics separate the two clearly. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 includes a Radeon 840M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, as indicated by the N/A designation in the database.

Power and thermal characteristics show the AMD chip as the more efficient design. The AMD processor has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 65 watts. The AMD chip's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Intel chip runs at a 2.50 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.00 GHz. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The sockets differ by platform. The AMD chip uses the AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor targets the mobile market segment, while the Intel processor targets desktop systems. Release dates show the AMD chip dated 2026-01-04 and the Intel chip dated 2023-12-31 in the database. Both processors remain in active production.

Where Each One Wins

The data shows no benchmark scenario where the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 comes out ahead. The Intel Core i5-14490F wins every recorded test. That said, the shape of the results suggests some workloads penalize the AMD chip less than others.

Single-threaded responsiveness is the AMD chip's least unfavorable category. The PassMark single-thread test shows only a 4.9% gap, indicating that in lightly threaded tasks, the AMD processor can approach the Intel chip's performance. This narrow margin appears despite the Intel chip's higher boost clock and older process node, which suggests the Zen 5 architecture delivers competitive per-core efficiency.

Multi-core and highly parallel workloads are where the Intel chip dominates most completely. The physics test, Cinebench R23 multicore, and prime number finding show the largest gaps, ranging from 63.9% to 65.3%. These workloads scale with core count and cache capacity, both of which favor the Intel chip's 10 cores and 24 MB L3 cache.

Encryption and compression workloads also heavily favor Intel, with gaps around 53% to 58%. These tasks benefit from the Intel chip's larger cache and higher thread count. The AMD chip's 4 MB L3 cache appears to be a limiting factor in data-intensive operations.

For users prioritizing power efficiency, the AMD chip's 28 watt TDP versus Intel's 65 watt TDP is noteworthy. The AMD processor also includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a separate GPU in basic display scenarios. The Intel chip requires a discrete graphics card for any display output.

Platform flexibility favors Intel in memory choices, as it supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD chip is restricted to DDR5 and LPDDR5X. However, the AMD chip offers ECC memory support, which the Intel chip lacks.

The integrated Radeon 840M in the AMD chip is the only graphics solution present in this comparison. For systems requiring a GPU, the Intel chip's lack of integrated graphics is a consideration. The AMD chip's mobile market segment and FP8 socket also point toward compact, power-conscious designs.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has an average benchmark score of 38149, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has an average of 19617.

Q: How large is the performance gap in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 23000 in Cinebench R23 multicore, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 scores 8130, a delta of -64.7% for the AMD chip.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 competitive in single-threaded performance?

A: The PassMark single-thread test shows the AMD chip at 3683 versus the Intel chip at 3873, a 4.9% difference, which is the closest margin in any recorded benchmark.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 includes a Radeon 840M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, and the AMD chip supports ECC memory while the Intel chip does not.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear conclusion. The Intel Core i5-14490F delivers substantially higher performance across every benchmark category in the database, with an average score of 38149 versus the AMD chip's 19617. The Intel processor's 10 cores, 16 threads, and 24 MB L3 cache provide a structural advantage in multi-threaded workloads that the AMD chip's 4 cores and 8 threads cannot overcome.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 is not without merit. Its 28 watt TDP positions it for power-sensitive mobile designs, and its integrated Radeon 840M graphics remove the need for a discrete GPU. The close 4.9% margin in PassMark single-thread performance shows that the Zen 5-based architecture can hold its own in lightly threaded tasks. ECC memory support and the 4 nm TSMC process node are additional technical strengths.

However, the benchmark results leave no ambiguity about performance hierarchy. The Intel chip wins all 15 head-to-head comparisons, with the largest gaps appearing in multi-core, physics, and encryption workloads. The Intel processor sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD chip sits at the 73rd percentile.

The choice between these processors depends on the intended platform. The Intel Core i5-14490F targets desktop Socket 1700 systems and demands a discrete graphics card. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 targets mobile FP8 systems and brings its own graphics solution. The data indicates that anyone prioritizing raw compute performance should select the Intel processor, while the AMD chip is the only option of the two for integrated-graphics mobile designs.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded specifications:

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 | Intel Core i5-14490F |

|---|---|---|

| Series | Not specified | Core 14th Gen |

| Cores | 4 | 10 |

| Threads | 8 | 16 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 28 watts | 65 watts |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die size | Not specified | 215 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 4 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not specified |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 840M | N/A |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production status | Active | Active |

| Release date | 2026-01-04 | 2023-12-31 |

| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |

| Part number | 100-000001787 | SRN35 |