AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 vs Intel Core 7 360 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 records an average benchmark score of 19617, while the Intel Core 7 360 scores 18374. The AMD part sits in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, with the Intel part at the 72nd percentile.

Q: How do the two compare in multi-threaded Cinebench workloads?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 wins decisively in Cinebench R23 multi-core, scoring 13634 against 8130 for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, a 40.4% advantage. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, Intel leads 1374 to 1195, a 13% margin.

Q: Which chip has the stronger single-core result in Cinebench R15?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 wins that specific test with a score of 269 versus 193 for the Intel Core 7 360, a 39.4% advantage. However, in Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel leads 1924 to 1797, a 6.6% edge.

Q: What are the core and thread configurations?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning it lacks simultaneous multithreading.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 360 does not.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core 7 360?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 has a launch MSRP of $426. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The head-to-head results show a clear split. The Intel Core 7 360 wins 12 of the 15 recorded benchmark comparisons. Its victories span both multi-threaded rendering and single-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel leads by 40.4%, and in PassMark floating point math, it leads by 39.5%. The Intel part also wins PassMark physics by 40.1%, PassMark find prime numbers by 63.3%, and PassMark data encryption by 32%. The PassMark single-thread test goes to Intel by 13.8%, and the PassMark multithread test goes to Intel by 14.3%.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 wins only three comparisons, but they are concentrated in specific areas. It takes Cinebench R15 single-core by 39.4%, a substantial margin. It also wins PassMark data compression by 11.2% and PassMark integer math by 15.8%. These three wins point to workloads where raw per-core integer throughput and compression efficiency matter more than raw core count or floating-point muscle.

The pattern suggests Intel dominates in rendering, physics simulation, encryption, and general floating-point arithmetic. AMD retains a niche in integer-heavy tasks and one legacy single-core benchmark. For users running compression tools or integer math workloads, the AMD part offers a measurable edge. For everything else in this comparison, the Intel part delivers higher recorded scores.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different foundries and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core 7 360 uses a 3 nm process from Intel. The AMD part belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation with the Gorgon Point codename, built on a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel part belongs to the Core 5 generation with the Wildcat Lake codename.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Intel design allocates more cache per core, which helps explain its strong showing in single-threaded workloads.

The integrated graphics also differ. AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. Memory support is similar on paper, with both supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but the memory bus configuration diverges. AMD runs dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel runs single-channel memory with a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, while the Intel part does not.

PCIe lane counts differ as well. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes from the CPU. This gives AMD a wider interface for peripherals and storage.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts represent the most visible divergence. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 offers 4 cores and 8 threads, enabling simultaneous multithreading. The Intel Core 7 360 offers 6 cores and 6 threads, with no multithreading support. This means the Intel part relies on physical cores alone for thread handling.

Clock speeds move in opposite directions. The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Intel runs a lower base frequency but reaches a higher peak.

Thermal design power differs substantially. The AMD part has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel part has a TDP of 15 watts. The Intel chip draws less power on paper while delivering higher scores in most tests.

Memory bandwidth and bus width favor AMD. The AMD part uses dual-channel memory and reaches 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part uses single-channel memory and reaches 59.7 GB/s. ECC support exists only on the AMD part.

The sockets are not interchangeable. AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, while Intel uses Intel BGA 1516. The process nodes differ: 4 nm for AMD, 3 nm for Intel. The release dates also differ, with the AMD part releasing on January 4, 2026, and the Intel part on April 15, 2026.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest Intel victory comes in PassMark find prime numbers, where it scores 120 against 44 for AMD, a 63.3% advantage. This test heavily favors the Intel core design and its higher boost clock. The second-largest Intel win is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with a 40.4% margin, which reflects the Intel part's six physical cores against AMD's four.

PassMark physics shows Intel leading 1213 to 726, a 40.1% margin. PassMark floating point math also goes to Intel by 39.5%, with scores of 44963 and 27193. These results indicate that the Intel part handles physics simulation and floating-point arithmetic far more efficiently than the AMD part in the recorded data.

PassMark data encryption goes to Intel by 32%, with scores of 11164 and 7591. PassMark multithread goes to Intel by 14.3%, with scores of 15544 and 13320. PassMark single-thread goes to Intel by 13.8%, with scores of 4274 and 3683. Cinebench R15 multi-core goes to Intel by 13%, with scores of 1374 and 1195.

The AMD victories are smaller in count but notable in magnitude. Cinebench R15 single-core goes to AMD by 39.4%, with scores of 269 and 193. This is a legacy benchmark, but the margin is large. PassMark integer math goes to AMD by 15.8%, with scores of 39637 and 34238. PassMark data compression goes to AMD by 11.2%, with scores of 158912 and 142877.

Cinebench R23 single-core goes to Intel by 6.6%, with scores of 1924 and 1797. PassMark extended instructions goes to Intel by 7.5%, with scores of 12390 and 11455. PassMark random string sorting goes to Intel by 5.7%, with scores of 17636 and 16623.

The win count stands at 12 for Intel and 3 for AMD. The average benchmark score, however, tells a slightly different story. AMD's average of 19617 is higher than Intel's 18374, despite Intel winning most head-to-head tests. This discrepancy comes from the specific suite of benchmarks included in the average, which weights AMD's compression and integer wins heavily.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear division of roles. The Intel Core 7 360 wins the majority of benchmark comparisons, including all rendering tests, physics, encryption, floating-point math, and single-threaded PassMark results. Its six physical cores and higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz deliver consistent advantages across a broad range of workloads. The lower TDP of 15 watts also makes it an efficient choice for sustained performance in mobile systems.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 wins in three specific areas: Cinebench R15 single-core, PassMark data compression, and PassMark integer math. Its dual-channel memory bus and 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth provide a structural advantage in memory-intensive integer tasks. The 4-core, 8-thread configuration with multithreading helps in compression workloads, where the AMD part leads by 11.2%. The higher average benchmark score of 19617 also suggests that the AMD part performs well in the aggregate metric used by the database.

For users prioritizing rendering performance, physics simulation, encryption, or general floating-point work, the Intel Core 7 360 is the stronger choice based on the head-to-head results. For users focused on integer math, data compression, or legacy single-core Cinebench R15 performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 offers a measurable advantage. ECC memory support and a wider PCIe interface further differentiate the AMD part for specific use cases.

The Intel part also carries a launch MSRP of $426, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. The final selection depends on which benchmark wins matter more for the intended workload. The data does not support a universal winner, but it does support a workload-specific recommendation.