AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 vs Intel Core 7 251TE Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 5 430
Core 7 251TE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 vs Intel Core 7 251TE
The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 and the Intel Core 7 251TE occupy very different positions in the database. The recorded head-to-head results show a decisive overall win for the Intel part, which takes 13 of the 15 compared benchmarks, while the AMD chip secures only 2. The Intel Core 7 251TE reaches an average benchmark score of 41650, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, whereas the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 averages 19617 and lands in the 73rd percentile. These percentile positions already hint at the performance gulf, but the individual test deltas reveal the scale of the separation.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The most striking result is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Intel Core 7 251TE scores 25518 against the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430's 8130. That is a 68.1% advantage for Intel, the largest percentage gap in the entire comparison. The Intel chip's 24 cores and 32 threads simply overwhelm the AMD part's 4 cores and 8 threads in heavily parallel workloads. Similarly, in Cinebench R15 multi-core, Intel leads with 2572 versus 1195, a 53.5% margin.
The single-core story is more nuanced. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel still wins by a wide margin: 3602 versus 1797, a 50.1% difference. Cinebench R15 single-core follows the same pattern, with Intel at 362 and AMD at 269, a 25.7% lead. However, PassMark's single-thread test flips the result. There, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 scores 3683, while the Intel Core 7 251TE scores 3568, giving AMD a 3.2% edge. This is the AMD chip's only meaningful victory in the CPU-intensive tests, and it suggests that the AMD core design has higher raw single-thread throughput in some workloads, even if Intel's higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz versus 4.50 GHz generally carries the day.
Across the PassMark suite, Intel's dominance is consistent. In integer math, Intel posts 125739 versus AMD's 39637, a 68.5% advantage. Floating point math shows a similar gap: 85607 against 27193, or 68.2%. Prime number finding, a test that often scales with core count, gives Intel 140 against AMD's 44, a 68.6% margin. Data encryption results are 22176 for Intel and 7591 for AMD, a 65.8% gap, while data compression shows 334399 versus 158912, a 52.5% difference. The extended instructions test is the closest of the PassMark CPU tests, with Intel at 16974 and AMD at 11455, a 32.5% lead. Multithreaded performance in PassMark mirrors the Cinebench results: Intel scores 30022, AMD scores 13320, a 55.6% gap. Physics, random string sorting, and the overall multithread metric all follow the same trend, with Intel ahead by 62.5%, 58.1%, and 55.6% respectively.
The data shows that the Intel Core 7 251TE is not just faster in multi-core; it is faster in nearly every measured dimension. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 only wins the PassMark single-thread test, and even there, the margin is a modest 3.2%. For any workload that can use more than a few threads, the Intel part has an insurmountable advantage in this comparison.
Architecture Differences
The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 uses the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 251TE, by contrast, uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 7 generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The process node difference is significant: the AMD chip's 4 nm process allows for a more compact design, though the Intel chip has a die size of 215 mm², while the AMD package's die size is not recorded.
Core counts diverge sharply. The AMD part has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel part has 24 cores and 32 threads. This explains the massive multi-core performance gap. Cache configurations also differ. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core, but the L2 cache is 1 MB per core on AMD versus 1.25 MB per core on Intel. The L3 cache shows the biggest structural difference: AMD has 4 MB of L3, whereas Intel has 36 MB of shared L3. That 36 MB pool gives Intel a substantial advantage in workloads that benefit from large shared caches, such as data compression and certain database operations.
Memory support differs as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel Core 7 251TE supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, and both have a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported on both. The PCIe interface differs: AMD uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives Intel a newer and wider PCIe link, which could matter for high-bandwidth peripherals.
The integrated graphics also differ. AMD pairs the Ryzen AI 5 430 with the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses the UHD Graphics 770. No benchmark data is available for either iGPU, so the comparison must remain qualitative. The market segments are different too: the AMD chip is a mobile processor using AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip is a desktop processor using Intel Socket 1700. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $384, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. Both processors have locked multipliers and are listed as active in production.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has an average benchmark score of 41650, compared to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430's 19617. The Intel part also ranks in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD part ranks in the 73rd percentile.
Q: In which benchmark does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 beat the Intel Core 7 251TE?
A: The AMD chip wins in the PassMark single-thread test, scoring 3683 against Intel's 3568, a 3.2% advantage. This is the only CPU benchmark where AMD leads; Intel wins the other 13 compared tests.
Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap?
A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 25518 versus AMD's 8130, a 68.1% lead. The PassMark multithread test shows a 55.6% gap, with Intel at 30022 and AMD at 13320.
Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 and the Intel Core 7 251TE have ECC memory support enabled.
Q: What is the difference in L3 cache size?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 251TE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is nine times larger.
Specification Differences
| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 | Intel Core 7 251TE |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Cores | 4 | 24 |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.40 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.40 GHz |
| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |
| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Codename | Gorgon Point | Bartlett Lake |
| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |
| Die Size | Not recorded | 215 mm² |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB (shared) |
| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |
| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2025-01-12 |
| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $384 |
| Part Number | 100-000001787 | SRQAXQ5ZG |
The table highlights that the two processors differ in nearly every fundamental specification. The Intel chip has six times the cores, four times the threads, a higher boost clock, a larger L3 cache, and a newer PCIe generation. The AMD chip has a smaller process node, a lower TDP, and a higher base clock. The Intel part is a desktop processor, while the AMD part is mobile.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 7 251TE wins decisively in all multi-threaded and most single-threaded benchmarks. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it is 68.1% ahead. In PassMark integer math, it is 68.5% ahead. In floating point math, 68.2%. In prime number finding, 68.6%. In data encryption, 65.8%. In physics, 62.5%. In random string sorting, 58.1%. In multithread, 55.6%. In data compression, 52.5%. In extended instructions, 32.5%. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it is 50.1% ahead. In Cinebench R15 single-core, 25.7% ahead. The only test where Intel does not win is PassMark single-thread, where it trails by 3.2%.
The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 wins only in that single PassMark test. Its score of 3683 versus 3568 indicates a slight advantage in that specific workload, likely reflecting the efficiency of the Zen 5 architecture at lower power. The AMD chip also carries a lower TDP of 28 W versus 45 W for Intel, which suggests it could be more suited to thermally constrained environments, though no thermal or power efficiency benchmarks are recorded in the database. The AMD part's smaller 4 nm process node and mobile socket also point toward a design focused on lower power consumption, even if the performance data does not show a corresponding advantage in most tests.
The Verdict
The benchmark data is unambiguous. The Intel Core 7 251TE is the far faster processor in almost every recorded test. Its average benchmark score of 41650 is more than double the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430's 19617. In multi-core workloads, the Intel part's 24 cores and 32 threads provide a 68.1% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and a 55.6% lead in PassMark multithread. Even in single-core workloads, Intel generally wins, with a 50.1% advantage in Cinebench R23 single-core and a 25.7% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core. The AMD chip only edges ahead in the PassMark single-thread test, and that win is small.
The Intel Core 7 251TE also offers a larger L3 cache (36 MB versus 4 MB), a higher boost clock (5.40 GHz versus 4.50 GHz), and PCIe Gen 5 support. These features reinforce its position as a high-performance desktop part. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, with its 4 cores, 28 W TDP, and mobile socket, appears oriented toward efficiency and compact systems, but the recorded data shows no performance category where it outclasses Intel except for the single PassMark thread test.
For a user choosing between these two based on the database, the Intel Core 7 251TE is the clear choice for any compute-intensive task. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 is the only option if the PassMark single-thread result is the primary metric, or if the lower TDP and mobile form factor are essential requirements. The percentile ranks alone, 88 versus 73, summarize the overall performance hierarchy. The data does not support any other conclusion.