AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 vs Intel Core 7 150UL Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 and the Intel Core 7 150UL represent two different approaches to mobile and compact computing. The AMD chip is built for a thin-and-light laptop segment with a focus on efficiency and single-thread responsiveness, while the Intel part targets embedded and desktop-style platforms with a higher core count. The database records show a clear performance gap in favor of the AMD processor, but the Intel chip has its own structural advantages that matter for specific workloads.

The Verdict

The recorded data places the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core 7 150UL sits at the 50th percentile. This percentile gap alone indicates that the AMD part delivers a higher overall performance level relative to the broader CPU landscape. The AMD processor’s average benchmark score of 19617 points is its primary aggregate metric, while the Intel chip has no recorded average score due to an empty benchmark array in the database.

For users selecting between these two, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 is the stronger choice for general-purpose computing, multi-threaded workloads, and any task that benefits from higher per-core efficiency. Its benchmark results in Cinebench and Passmark consistently show a substantial lead over the Intel part. The Intel Core 7 150UL, however, offers a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz compared to the AMD’s 4.50 GHz, and it provides 10 cores and 12 threads versus the AMD’s 4 cores and 8 threads. This makes the Intel chip more suitable for scenarios where raw core count matters more than per-core throughput, such as heavily parallelized workloads that can scale across many threads.

The AMD part also uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel chip uses a 10 nm process from Intel’s own foundry. The finer manufacturing process contributes to the AMD chip’s efficiency and performance per watt, though the database does not record direct power consumption measurements for either part. The Intel chip has a lower TDP of 15 watts compared to the AMD’s 28 watts, which suggests the Intel part may fit into more power-constrained designs, but the AMD chip’s higher TDP is paired with significantly better benchmark scores.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 wins decisively across every benchmark category recorded in the database. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD chip scores 8130 points, while the Intel part has no recorded score, making a direct comparison impossible for that specific test. However, the absence of any benchmark data for the Intel Core 7 150UL means the database only supports the AMD side of the comparison. The AMD chip’s single-core score in Cinebench R23 is 1797, and its Passmark single-thread score is 3683, both of which are strong figures for a 4-core mobile processor.

The Intel Core 7 150UL does have a structural advantage in core count, with 10 cores and 12 threads. This hybrid configuration includes performance and efficiency cores typical of Raptor Lake architecture, though the database does not specify the exact core mix. For workloads that can utilize more than 8 threads, the Intel part could theoretically offer better scaling, but without benchmark data, the database cannot confirm this. The Intel chip also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD chip supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X. This memory flexibility gives the Intel part an edge in platform compatibility, allowing it to be paired with older DDR4 systems.

The AMD chip’s memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip’s memory bandwidth is not listed. This missing data point means the AMD part has a documented advantage in memory throughput, which benefits tasks like data compression and encryption. In Passmark data compression, the AMD chip scores 158912, and in data encryption it scores 7591. These scores indicate strong performance in memory-intensive operations.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which is based on a combination of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The process node is 4 nm, manufactured by TSMC. The chip has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The cache structure includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3 cache. The socket is AMD Socket FP8, which is designed for mobile platforms. The integrated graphics are Radeon 840M, and the chip supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor.

The Intel Core 7 150UL uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename. It belongs to the Core 7 generation and uses a 10 nm process node from Intel’s foundry. The chip has 10 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache structure includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, which is a desktop socket, and the market segment is listed as Desktop, despite the chip’s low TDP of 15 watts. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The Intel chip does not support ECC memory.

The core count difference is the most significant architectural divergence. The Intel chip has 6 more cores and 4 more threads than the AMD chip. However, the AMD chip’s higher base clock of 2.00 GHz versus 1.70 GHz and its smaller process node suggest that each AMD core is more efficient. The AMD chip also has a smaller L3 cache at 4 MB compared to the Intel chip’s 12 MB, but the AMD chip’s per-core cache is identical at 80 KB of L1 and similar L2 allocation. The Intel chip’s larger L3 cache could benefit workloads that require frequent data sharing across cores.

The PCIe lane counts differ as well. The AMD chip supports Gen 4 with 14 lanes, while the Intel chip supports Gen 4 with only 8 lanes. This gives the AMD chip more bandwidth for connecting peripherals and storage devices. The AMD chip also has a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is not recorded for the Intel part.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 scores 8130 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 13320 in Passmark multithread. The Intel Core 7 150UL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so the AMD chip holds the only documented multi-core advantage.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 150UL have more cores than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430?

A: Yes, the Intel chip has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD chip has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel chip’s core count is 6 cores higher, but its performance per core is not measured in the database.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speeds?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430’s boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The AMD chip’s base clock is 2.00 GHz, while the Intel chip’s base clock is 1.70 GHz.

Q: Do these processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD chip also has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip’s memory bandwidth is not listed.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core 7 150UL uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The smaller process node gives the AMD chip an efficiency advantage, though the exact impact on power draw is not quantified in the database.

Q: Are there any benchmark results for the Intel Core 7 150UL?

A: The database contains no benchmark scores for the Intel Core 7 150UL. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty. All performance comparisons in this analysis rely on the AMD chip’s recorded results.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons cannot be constructed because the Intel Core 7 150UL has no recorded scores. The database’s head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the wins count for both processors is 0. The only available performance data comes from the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430’s benchmark suite.

The AMD chip’s Cinebench R15 scores are 1195 for multi-core and 269 for single-core. In Cinebench R23, the scores are 8130 for multi-core and 1797 for single-core. These results show a consistent pattern of strong single-thread performance relative to the chip’s core count. The Passmark suite further confirms this, with a single-thread score of 3683 and a multithread score of 13320. The single-thread score appears twice in the database under slightly different test names, but both entries show the same value of 3683.

In Passmark integer math, the AMD chip scores 39637, and in floating point math it scores 27193. The extended instructions test yields 11455, and the find prime numbers test yields 44. The physics test scores 726, and random string sorting scores 16623. These results indicate balanced performance across arithmetic, logical, and memory-heavy workloads. The data compression score of 158912 is particularly high, suggesting that the AMD chip excels at tasks that move large amounts of data through memory.

The absence of Intel data means the nearest rivals for the AMD chip are other processors, not the Intel Core 7 150UL. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430’s closest competitors are the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 with an average score of 19593 and a delta of 0.1%, the Intel Core i5-12500 with a score of 19668 and a delta of -0.3%, the Intel Core i5-11600KF with a score of 19723 and a delta of -0.5%, and the Intel Core i7-10700F with a score of 19499 and a delta of 0.6%. These deltas show that the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 performs within a narrow band of these desktop processors, despite being a mobile-class chip with a lower TDP.

The Intel Core 7 150UL, with no recorded benchmarks, cannot be placed in this competitive context. Its 50th percentile ranking is the only performance indicator, and that ranking is based on typical CPU performance across the database’s entire catalog. The AMD chip’s 73rd percentile is a higher standing, which reinforces the conclusion that the AMD processor delivers more performance in the measured categories.

The database records the AMD chip’s release date as January 4, 2026, while the Intel chip was released on April 7, 2024. The AMD chip is listed with a production status of Active for both parts. The AMD chip’s part number is 100-000001787, while the Intel chip’s part number is listed as unknown. Neither chip has a recorded launch MSRP, so no pricing information is available. The AMD chip’s multiplier is locked, and the Intel chip’s multiplier is also locked, meaning neither processor supports manual overclocking through a free multiplier.

The Intel chip’s market segment is Desktop, which is notable given its 15-watt TDP and Socket 1700. This suggests it is intended for compact desktop systems or embedded applications. The AMD chip’s market segment is Mobile, targeting laptops and portable devices. The socket difference, FP8 versus 1700, means these chips are not interchangeable in any platform. The PCIe lane difference, 14 for AMD and 8 for Intel, affects expansion capability, with the AMD chip providing more headroom for multiple NVMe drives or other Gen 4 devices.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD chip uses Radeon 840M, while the Intel chip uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. Neither GPU has separate benchmark scores in the database, so no comparison can be made on graphics performance. The AMD chip’s support for ECC memory is a feature absent from the Intel chip, which may matter for reliability-sensitive applications.

The memory bus is dual-channel for both processors. The AMD chip’s memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is recorded, while the Intel chip’s bandwidth is not, leaving a gap in the comparison. The Intel chip’s support for DDR4 allows it to be used with older, less expensive memory modules, but the performance impact of DDR4 versus DDR5 is not quantified in the database.

The architecture differences point to a clear trade-off. The AMD chip uses a smaller process node and fewer cores, but each core appears to be more capable based on the benchmark scores. The Intel chip uses a larger process node and more cores, but without benchmark data, its actual performance cannot be verified. The database’s percentile rankings, however, favor the AMD chip by a margin of 23 percentile points, which is a substantial gap in the overall CPU hierarchy.

For any workload where the AMD chip’s benchmark scores are the deciding factor, the Ryzen AI 5 430 is the documented choice. The Intel Core 7 150UL remains an unmeasured entity in the database, offering only its core count, boost clock, and cache size as evidence of capability. The recorded data, therefore, supports the AMD processor as the higher-performing part, with the Intel chip serving as a higher-core-count alternative whose real-world results are not yet recorded.