AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 vs Intel Core 7 150HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently holds no paired benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 and the Intel Core 7 150HL. The head-to-head table is empty, and neither CPU has a recorded win count against the other in direct comparison tests. This means any performance relationship between the two must be inferred from their individual recorded scores and their relative standing against other processors in the database, rather than from direct side-by-side measurements.

For the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, the recorded data is substantial. In Cinebench R23, it scores 8130 points in multi-core and 1797 points in single-core. The R15 results show 1195 points multi-core and 269 points single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 13320, a single-thread score of 3683, integer math at 39637, floating point math at 27193, extended instructions at 11455, data compression at 158912, data encryption at 7591, and random string sorting at 16623. The CPU also records 44 in prime number finding and 726 in physics calculations.

The Intel Core 7 150HL has no benchmark entries at all in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and its nearest rivals list is empty. This absence of data means the Intel part cannot be positioned against the AMD chip through measured results. The percentile figures illustrate the gap in known performance: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 sits at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core 7 150HL sits at the 50th percentile, though this latter figure is based on no recorded test scores.

What can be stated from the available numbers is how the AMD processor compares to its own nearest rivals. The Ryzen AI 5 430 has an average benchmark score of 19617. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 scores 19593, a delta of 0.1%. The Intel Core i5-12500 scores 19668, a delta of -0.3%. The Intel Core i5-11600KF scores 19723, a delta of -0.5%. The Intel Core i7-10700F scores 19499, a delta of 0.6%. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating the Ryzen AI 5 430 performs in a tightly packed band with those four desktop processors, slightly ahead of the Ryzen 5 5500 and Core i7-10700F, slightly behind the Core i5-12500 and Core i5-11600KF.

The absence of head-to-head results for the Intel Core 7 150HL means no direct comparison can be drawn. The data shows the AMD part has a complete benchmark profile, while the Intel part has none. Any claim about which CPU is faster in a specific workload would lack support from the recorded measurements.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: Yes. The database includes Cinebench R15 and R23 results, plus multiple PassMark tests. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 8130 and single-core is 1797. PassMark multi-thread is 13320 and single-thread is 3683.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 150HL have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The benchmark array for the Intel Core 7 150HL is empty, its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed in the database.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 19617 is 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 (19593), 0.6% above the Intel Core i7-10700F (19499), 0.3% below the Intel Core i5-12500 (19668), and 0.5% below the Intel Core i5-11600KF (19723).

Q: What percentile does each CPU hold among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 is at the 73rd percentile. The Intel Core 7 150HL is at the 50th percentile, though no benchmark scores back that placement.

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which CPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL boosts to 5.00 GHz. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 boosts to 4.50 GHz. The Intel part also has a higher base clock at 2.40 GHz versus 2.00 GHz for the AMD part.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, built on a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 150HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename, belonging to the Core 7 generation. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. The process node difference is significant: the AMD part uses a smaller 4 nm node versus Intel's 10 nm node, which typically indicates denser transistors and potentially better power efficiency per unit area, though the database does not record transistor counts or die sizes for either.

Cache configurations differ notably. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 150HL has the same 80 KB L1 per core, but doubles L2 to 2 MB per core, and provides 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The massive L3 advantage for Intel, 24 MB versus 4 MB, reflects the larger core count and the shared cache design across the 14-core configuration.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD part uses the Radeon 840M, while the Intel part uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The database does not include graphics benchmark scores, so their relative graphics performance cannot be assessed here.

Memory support shows a split. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with dual-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 150HL supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but has no recorded memory bandwidth figure and does not support ECC memory. The AMD part's support for LPDDR5X indicates a design aimed at lower-power mobile scenarios, while the Intel part's DDR4 support suggests broader compatibility with existing desktop memory.

PCIe lanes also differ. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The Intel Core 7 150HL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Both use PCIe Gen 4, but the AMD part has more CPU-attached lanes.

The market segments differ. The AMD part is marked as Mobile, while the Intel part is marked as Desktop. The Intel part uses socket LGA 1700, a desktop socket. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile socket. Production status for both is listed as Active. Neither CPU has an unlocked multiplier, meaning neither supports user overclocking through multiplier adjustment.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in every major specification field recorded in the database.

Core and thread counts: AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has 4 cores and 8 threads. Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Clocks: The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

TDP: The AMD part is rated at 28 W. The Intel part is rated at 45 W.

Socket: The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process node: The AMD part is built on 4 nm at TSMC. The Intel part is built on 10 nm at Intel.

L2 cache: The AMD part has 1 MB per core. The Intel part has 2 MB per core.

L3 cache: The AMD part has 4 MB. The Intel part has 24 MB shared.

Memory support: The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Memory bandwidth: The AMD part records 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part has no recorded bandwidth.

ECC memory: The AMD part supports ECC. The Intel part does not.

PCIe: The AMD part has Gen 4 with 14 lanes. The Intel part has Gen 4 with 8 lanes.

Integrated graphics: The AMD part uses Radeon 840M. The Intel part uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.

Market segment: The AMD part is Mobile. The Intel part is Desktop.

Release date: The AMD part released on 2026-01-04. The Intel part released on 2024-04-07.

Part number: The AMD part is 100-000001787. The Intel part is listed as unknown.

The Verdict

The data presents an unusual situation. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has a complete benchmark record, while the Intel Core 7 150HL has none. Any verdict must acknowledge this asymmetry. For the AMD processor, the recorded scores place it at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19617. Its nearest rivals, all desktop processors from a few years back, sit within 0.6% of its average score. This indicates the Ryzen AI 5 430, despite being a 4-core mobile chip, delivers performance comparable to established 6-core and 8-core desktop parts in the aggregate benchmark average.

The Intel Core 7 150HL, with its 14 cores and 20 threads, a 5.00 GHz boost clock, and 24 MB of L3 cache, presents a strong specification sheet on paper. The 45 W TDP and desktop socket suggest a part designed for sustained performance in desktop-class workloads. But the database contains no measured scores for it. Its 50th percentile ranking is unsupported by any benchmark entries.

For users choosing between these two based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 offers verifiable performance results that place it in the upper quartile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 150HL offers a superior core count, higher clocks, and more cache on paper, but no measured evidence of how that translates into actual performance. The AMD part is the only one with benchmark confirmation. The Intel part remains an unknown quantity in this database.

The AMD part also brings ECC memory support, a mobile form factor suited to lower power envelopes at 28 W, and more PCIe lanes. The Intel part brings DDR4 compatibility, a desktop socket, and a much larger L3 cache. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Given the evidence available, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 is the only processor with demonstrated benchmark results. The Intel Core 7 150HL cannot be recommended on the basis of measured performance because no measurements exist. Users who prioritize verified scores should look to the AMD part. Users who prioritize core count and cache size on paper may consider the Intel part, but they would be making that choice without any supporting benchmark data. The database records what it records, and for the Intel Core 7 150HL, that is nothing but specifications.