AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 and Intel Core 3 201TE are both 4-core, 8-thread processors, but the benchmark database currently contains a complete set of measurements for the AMD part and no recorded scores for the Intel chip. The Ryzen AI 5 430 posts an average benchmark score of 19617, placing it in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database. The Intel Core 3 201TE sits in the 50th percentile with no average score recorded, which means direct head-to-head comparisons are limited to what the data shows for the AMD processor and its nearest rivals.

In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen AI 5 430 delivers a multicore score of 8130 and a single-core score of 1797. The Cinebench R15 results follow the same pattern, with a multicore score of 1195 and a single-core score of 269. These figures indicate a balanced design where single-threaded performance scales well relative to multicore output, a useful trait for mixed workloads.

On the PassMark suite, the AMD chip shows notable strengths in specific tasks. The integer math score is 39637, while floating point math reaches 27193. Extended instructions hit 11455, and data compression scores 158912. Data encryption records 7591, and random string sorting finishes at 16623. The multithread score is 13320, and the single-thread score is 3683. The find prime numbers test returns 44, and the physics test records 726.

The nearest rivals in the database give context to these numbers. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 has an average score of 19593, which is 0.1% lower than the Ryzen AI 5 430. The Intel Core i5-12500 posts 19668, 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i5-11600KF scores 19723, 0.5% higher, and the Intel Core i7-10700F records 19499, 0.6% lower. These deltas are small, meaning the Ryzen AI 5 430 sits in a tightly contested performance band with several established desktop processors, despite its mobile market segment.

The Intel Core 3 201TE has no benchmark entries in the database, so its wins cannot be quantified. The data indicates a clear asymmetry: the AMD part has extensive recorded results, while the Intel part has none. Without scores for the Core 3 201TE, any claim about which chip wins a given test remains unsupported by the recorded data.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 430 has an average benchmark score of 19617. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 (19593), 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i7-10700F (19499), 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-12500 (19668), and 0.5% behind the Intel Core i5-11600KF (19723).

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 201TE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Core 3 201TE, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has 15 recorded benchmark results.

Q: What are the single-core and multicore scores for the AMD processor?

A: In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen AI 5 430 scores 1797 single-core and 8130 multicore. In Cinebench R15, it scores 269 single-core and 1195 multicore. PassMark single-thread is 3683, and PassMark multithread is 13320.

Q: Which processor has the higher clock speed?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Intel chip leads in both base and boost clock figures.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Core 3 201TE supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. The AMD chip has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip records 76.8 GB/s.

Q: How do their percentiles compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 is in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core 3 201TE is in the 50th percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 wins in every benchmark category where data exists, simply because the Intel Core 3 201TE has no recorded scores. Within the AMD chip's own results, the strongest areas are data compression (158912), integer math (39637), and floating point math (27193). These are compute-heavy tasks that benefit from the processor's Zen 5 architecture and its 4 nm manufacturing process.

The Intel Core 3 201TE shows theoretical advantages in clock speed, with a 2.90 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost, compared to the AMD chip's 2.00 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost. Higher clocks often translate to faster single-threaded responsiveness, though the absence of benchmark data prevents confirmation. The Intel chip also offers 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which could support faster storage and expansion devices, versus the AMD chip's 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

For workloads that depend on memory bandwidth, the AMD part holds the edge in specification, with 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. The AMD chip also supports LPDDR5X memory, which the Intel part does not. For workloads that depend on cache capacity, the Intel chip has a 12 MB shared L3 cache, while the AMD chip has a 4 MB L3 cache, which could favor the Intel part in repeated data access patterns.

The AMD processor is a mobile part on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700. This distinction matters for system builders: the Intel chip fits standard desktop motherboards, while the AMD chip targets portable or compact designs. The AMD chip has a 28 W TDP, and the Intel chip has a 45 W TDP, indicating different thermal and power envelopes.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 has 4 cores and 8 threads, and the Intel Core 3 201TE also has 4 cores and 8 threads, so core and thread counts are identical. Base clocks differ: 2.00 GHz for AMD versus 2.90 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks differ: 4.50 GHz for AMD versus 4.60 GHz for Intel.

TDP differs significantly. The AMD chip is rated at 28 W, while the Intel chip is rated at 45 W. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. Process nodes differ: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. The AMD chip is manufactured by TSMC, and the Intel chip is manufactured by Intel.

Cache configurations differ. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD chip has 1 MB of L2 per core, while the Intel chip has 1.25 MB of L2 per core. The AMD chip has 4 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel chip has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support differs. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth differs: 89.6 GB/s for AMD versus 76.8 GB/s for Intel. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe support differs. The AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: the AMD chip has Radeon 840M, and the Intel chip has UHD Graphics 730.

The Intel chip has a die size of 163 mm², while the AMD chip has no die size recorded. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $134, and the AMD chip has no launch MSRP listed. The AMD chip was released on 2026-01-04, and the Intel chip was released on 2025-01-12. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, built on the Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitectures. The process node is 4 nm, and the foundry is TSMC. This architecture targets efficient mobile computing, with a 28 W TDP and support for LPDDR5X memory, which is common in thin and light systems.

The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 generation. The process node is 10 nm, and the foundry is Intel. The die size is 163 mm². This architecture targets desktop systems, with a 45 W TDP and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving system builders flexibility in platform choice.

The L1 cache structure is identical at 80 KB per core for both processors. The L2 cache differs slightly, with AMD at 1 MB per core and Intel at 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a larger gap: AMD has 4 MB, while Intel has 12 MB shared. This larger L3 could benefit the Intel chip in workloads that repeatedly access a moderately sized dataset.

The AMD chip uses a 4 nm process, which is a more advanced node compared to Intel's 10 nm process. The smaller node typically enables higher transistor density and lower power consumption at the same performance level. The TDP figures reflect this: 28 W for AMD versus 45 W for Intel.

The integrated graphics differ in naming and likely capability. The AMD chip uses Radeon 840M, and the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730. The database does not include graphics benchmark scores for either part, so a performance comparison is not possible from the recorded data.

The AMD chip is a mobile part, and the Intel chip is a desktop part. This architectural split explains the socket differences, TDP differences, and memory support differences. The AMD chip supports PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes, and the Intel chip supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which reflects the desktop platform's focus on expansion capability.

Both processors support ECC memory, a feature that appears in some workstation and server-oriented configurations. The AMD chip's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s exceeds the Intel chip's 76.8 GB/s, which suggests the AMD platform can feed data to the cores at a higher rate, assuming the memory subsystem is configured appropriately.

The production status for both processors is active, meaning neither is discontinued. The Intel chip has a part number of SRPKDQ5CK, and the AMD chip has a part number of 100-000001787. The Intel chip carries a launch MSRP of $134, while the AMD chip has no launch MSRP recorded in the database.