AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Intel Core 9 273PTE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and Intel Core 9 273PTE occupy different corners of the processor market, with the AMD part aimed at mobile systems and the Intel chip positioned as a desktop part. Despite the Intel processor’s higher core and thread counts, the recorded benchmark data shows the AMD chip winning the majority of direct comparisons. Out of 17 head-to-head tests, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS takes 14 wins, while the Core 9 273PTE secures 3. This split defines the performance profile of each processor.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS dominates across nearly every general-purpose and content-creation workload. Its advantages are most pronounced in data encryption, extended instruction sets, random string sorting, and data compression. These are workloads that reward high single-core throughput and efficient instruction execution, and the Ryzen chip delivers substantial margins in each. The AMD processor also wins in all six Cinebench tests, covering both single-core and multi-core rendering performance, which makes it the stronger choice for 3D rendering and CPU-bound video encoding tasks.

The Intel Core 9 273PTE counters in three specific areas: prime number finding, physics calculations, and floating-point math. The prime number test result is particularly notable, as the Intel chip scores 142 against the AMD’s 87, a lead of 38.7 percent. The physics test shows a similar pattern, with Intel ahead by 27.5 percent, and floating-point math gives Intel a narrower 2.8 percent margin. These wins point to workloads that rely on specific mathematical operations rather than general integer or encryption throughput. For scientific simulations, physics engines, or number-theoretic computations, the Intel processor holds a measurable edge.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It integrates 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The chip supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support. It provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes and pairs with the Radeon 780M integrated graphics. The package is designed for AMD Socket FP7, and the transistor count reaches 25,000 million on a 178 mm² die.

The Intel Core 9 273PTE belongs to the Bartlett Lake generation and uses a 10 nm Intel process. It offers 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The cache structure is larger: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, and the memory bandwidth matches the AMD part at 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is also supported. The Intel chip provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes and uses UHD Graphics 730 as its integrated solution. It fits Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as a desktop processor.

Notable differences include the core count disparity, the process node gap, and the cache capacities. The Intel part has 50 percent more cores and threads, yet its much lower base clock suggests a different power and frequency strategy. The AMD chip’s higher base clock and smaller process node likely contribute to its single-thread performance advantage. The Intel chip’s larger L3 cache (36 MB vs. 16 MB) does not translate into wins in cache-sensitive tests like data compression or random string sorting, where the AMD part leads decisively.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS wins every Cinebench iteration by a consistent margin. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD scores 24,565 against Intel’s 20,445, a 20.2 percent advantage. The single-core R23 test shows the AMD at 3,468 versus Intel’s 2,886, also a 20.2 percent gap. The R20 multi-core test repeats the pattern: 10,317 against 8,586, and the R15 multi-core test gives AMD 2,476 versus 2,060. These results indicate that the AMD chip’s 8 cores outperform Intel’s 12 cores in rendering workloads, despite the Intel part’s higher thread count.

The largest single margin belongs to the extended instructions test, where the AMD chip scores 25,434 against Intel’s 15,952, a 59.4 percent lead. Data encryption also favors AMD heavily, with 20,487 versus 14,253, a 43.7 percent difference. Random string sorting gives AMD a 44.5 percent edge, and data compression shows a 33 percent advantage. These are large, workload-specific gaps that suggest the AMD architecture handles SIMD and cryptographic operations with far greater efficiency.

The Intel Core 9 273PTE’s wins are concentrated in math-heavy tasks. In prime number finding, Intel scores 142 against AMD’s 87, a 38.7 percent lead in the Intel direction. The physics test gives Intel 1,917 versus 1,389, a 27.5 percent advantage. Floating-point math is closer, with Intel at 60,673 and AMD at 58,965, a 2.8 percent margin. These wins show that the Intel part has strengths in specific computational patterns, but they do not offset the AMD chip’s dominance in the broader test suite.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS records an average benchmark score of 39,325, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE averages 31,143. The AMD chip also sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, compared to the Intel part’s 82nd percentile.

Q: How do the two processors compare in multi-core rendering?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS leads in all multi-core Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 24,565 against Intel’s 20,445, a 20.2 percent advantage. The R20 multi-core test shows a similar 20.2 percent gap, with AMD at 10,317 and Intel at 8,586.

Q: Does the Intel Core 9 273PTE win any tests?

A: Yes, the Intel processor wins 3 of the 17 head-to-head tests: passmark_find_prime_numbers, passmark_physics, and passmark_floating_point_math. Its largest win is in prime number finding, where it leads by 38.7 percent.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each processor?

A: Both processors support dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The AMD chip supports DDR5 only, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS with 8 cores and 16 threads. Despite this, the AMD chip wins the majority of multi-threaded benchmark tests.

Q: What are the integrated graphics solutions?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Radeon 780M, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE uses UHD Graphics 730.

The Verdict

The benchmark data presents a clear hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the superior processor for the vast majority of workloads, winning 14 of 17 direct comparisons. Its advantages in Cinebench rendering, data compression, encryption, and integer math make it the stronger choice for content creation, general productivity, and any task that benefits from high single-core efficiency. The consistent 20 percent margins across all Cinebench tests indicate that the AMD chip’s 8-core Zen 4 design outperforms the Intel part’s 12-core Bartlett Lake configuration in threaded workloads.

The Intel Core 9 273PTE retains a narrow but real niche. Its wins in prime number finding, physics, and floating-point math suggest that it is better suited for specific scientific or simulation workloads that depend on those operations. The 38.7 percent lead in prime number finding is substantial, and the 27.5 percent physics advantage is meaningful for physics-based computations. However, these three wins are isolated and do not compensate for the AMD chip’s broader performance envelope.

For users selecting between these two parts, the decision hinges on workload type. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the default recommendation for general-purpose computing, rendering, and data-heavy tasks, given its benchmark dominance and higher average score. The Intel Core 9 273PTE is only preferable in scenarios dominated by prime number calculations, physics simulations, or floating-point-heavy code, where its specific strengths can be exploited. The data does not support a broader case for the Intel processor outside those targeted workloads.