AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Intel Core 5 221E Comparison

The Intel Core 5 221E and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS represent two distinct approaches to high-performance computing: a desktop-focused Intel part with a hybrid core layout against a mobile-oriented AMD chip built on a leading-edge process. The benchmark data shows a clear overall winner in the Intel Core 5 221E, which takes 13 of the 17 recorded head-to-head tests, but the AMD chip is far from a pushover, dominating in several specialized workloads. This analysis breaks down exactly where each processor excels, what the architecture tells us, and who should choose which based purely on the recorded performance metrics.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking margin in the entire dataset belongs to the Intel Core 5 221E in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where it scores 173 against the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS’s 87, a 98.9% advantage. This is a massive win for Intel, indicating an overwhelming lead in this specific integer-heavy, latency-sensitive workload. Similarly, in PassMark physics, Intel leads with a score of 2230 versus 1389, a 60.5% delta, showing a significant edge in simulation and physics calculations. The floating-point math test also goes decisively to Intel, with 79028 versus 58965, a 34% advantage, and integer math follows suit at 117813 versus 97625, a 20.7% lead.

Beyond these specialized tests, Intel maintains a consistent, smaller lead across the entire Cinebench suite. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Intel Core 5 221E scores 25933 against the AMD’s 24565, a 5.6% lead, and the single-core result mirrors this exactly at 3661 versus 3468, also a 5.6% delta. This pattern holds for Cinebench R20 and R15, with Intel leading by 5.6% and 5.5% respectively in both multi and single-core variants. The PassMark multithread test shows a 6.8% lead for Intel (30510 versus 28572), and the single-thread score shows a larger 10.2% advantage (4147 versus 3762). This consistency across render workloads and general threading suggests the Intel chip’s higher core count translates directly into a meaningful, if not overwhelming, performance edge in CPU-intensive tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, however, claims four decisive victories. The largest is in PassMark extended instructions, where it scores 25434 against Intel’s 18216, a dominant 28.4% lead. This indicates a major advantage in SIMD and specialized instruction throughput. It also wins in data compression with 343952 versus 324285 (a 5.7% lead), data encryption with 20487 versus 19205 (a 6.3% lead), and random string sorting with 41867 versus 37686 (a 10% lead). These wins are concentrated in data-processing and cryptographic workloads, where the AMD architecture’s efficiency per core appears to pay off despite having fewer cores.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-threaded performance?

A: The Intel Core 5 221E is faster. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 3661 versus the AMD’s 3468, a 5.6% advantage. This is reinforced by the PassMark single-thread score, where Intel leads by 10.2% (4147 versus 3762).

Q: How do the two chips compare in multi-threaded workloads like video rendering?

A: The Intel Core 5 221E is consistently ahead. In Cinebench R23 multicore, it scores 25933 versus 24565, a 5.6% lead. The PassMark multithread test shows a similar 6.8% advantage for Intel (30510 versus 28572).

Q: Are there any workloads where the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is significantly better?

A: Yes, in specialized instruction processing. The AMD chip leads by 28.4% in PassMark extended instructions (25434 versus 18216). It also wins in data compression, encryption, and random string sorting, with leads of 5.7%, 6.3%, and 10% respectively.

Q: What is the most dramatic performance difference between the two?

A: The PassMark find prime numbers test shows the largest gap. Intel scores 173, which is 98.9% higher than AMD’s 87. This is an outlier-level difference that highlights a specific strength in integer prime calculation for the Intel part.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 221E has a higher average score of 40144, compared to the AMD’s 39325. This places Intel in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while AMD sits at the 86th percentile.

Q: Does the AMD chip have any advantage in power-sensitive applications?

A: The data does not include power consumption benchmarks. However, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS carries a 45W TDP rating, while the Intel Core 5 221E is rated at 65W, indicating a design focus on efficiency for the AMD part.

Architecture Differences

The two chips are built on fundamentally different process technologies. The Intel Core 5 221E uses a 10 nm node fabricated by Intel, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses a much more advanced 4 nm node from TSMC. This is reflected in the transistor count: AMD integrates 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, whereas Intel’s die is larger at 257 mm² with no transistor count listed in the database. The AMD chip’s smaller, denser process likely contributes to its efficiency, but the Intel chip’s larger physical footprint houses a higher core count.

Core configuration is another major divider. The Intel Core 5 221E has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. The cache hierarchy also differs. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, with 24 MB of shared L3. AMD offers 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, with a smaller 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip’s larger per-core L2 and bigger L3 pool likely supports its performance in multi-threaded tasks.

The integrated graphics are a notable point of difference. Intel pairs its chip with UHD Graphics 730, while AMD uses the Radeon 780M. The platform support also diverges: Intel uses Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas AMD uses Socket FP7 and supports only DDR5. Both are dual-channel and have identical memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s. PCIe support is also different, with Intel offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and AMD offering Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Intel chip is based on the Bartlett Lake codename, while AMD’s is based on Hawk Point with Zen 4 architecture.

Specification Differences

The most obvious difference is core count: Intel has 14 cores and 20 threads, compared to AMD’s 8 cores and 16 threads. Clock speeds also favor Intel on the boost side, with a 5.20 GHz boost clock versus AMD’s 5.10 GHz, but AMD has a higher base clock at 3.80 GHz versus Intel’s 2.70 GHz. The TDP rating is 65W for Intel and 45W for AMD, a significant gap for system design.

The process node is a clear differentiator: Intel is on 10 nm, while AMD is on a 4 nm TSMC process. The sockets are incompatible: Intel Socket 1700 versus AMD Socket FP7. Memory support differs, with Intel supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports only DDR5. PCIe generations also diverge, with Intel offering Gen 5 (16 lanes) and AMD offering Gen 4 (20 lanes). The integrated GPU is different (UHD Graphics 730 versus Radeon 780M), and the release dates are different: Intel launched on 2025-01-12, while AMD launched on 2024-04-15. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $232, while the AMD chip has no listed MSRP.

The Verdict

The data points decisively toward the Intel Core 5 221E as the stronger overall performer. Its 13 wins out of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, combined with a higher average score (40144 versus 39325) and a higher percentile ranking (87th versus 86th), establishes it as the better choice for general-purpose and multi-threaded workloads. The consistent 5.6% lead across Cinebench tests and the massive 98.9% lead in prime number finding make it the clear pick for CPU-bound tasks like rendering, physics simulation, and integer math. The Intel chip’s 14 cores and 20 threads, paired with a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz, provide a tangible advantage in nearly every category.

However, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS wins in four specific areas: extended instructions, data compression, encryption, and random string sorting. For users who prioritize these workloads, particularly those involving SIMD operations or heavy cryptographic processing, the AMD chip’s 28.4% lead in extended instructions is a compelling reason to choose it. Its lower 45W TDP also makes it more suitable for compact or power-constrained systems, although the database does not provide efficiency benchmarks. The AMD chip’s 8 cores are fewer, but its 4 nm process and Zen 4 architecture deliver strong per-core efficiency in these targeted tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 221E is the winner for users who need maximum multi-threaded performance across a wide range of tasks. This includes 3D rendering, video encoding, software compilation, and any workload that scales with core count. Its 20 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache give it a clear edge in Cinebench tests, and its 34% lead in floating-point math makes it ideal for scientific computing and financial modeling. The 60.5% advantage in physics simulations further cements its position for engineering and gaming physics calculations. If the workload involves prime number calculation, the Intel chip is an absolute necessity, given its near-doubled score in that specific test.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the better choice for data-centric and security-focused workloads. Its 28.4% lead in extended instructions makes it superior for applications that leverage AVX-512 or similar SIMD instruction sets, such as certain AI inference tasks and digital signal processing. The wins in data compression (5.7% lead) and encryption (6.3% lead) make it a strong candidate for database servers, file compression tools, and VPN or secure communication endpoints. The 10% advantage in random string sorting also suggests an edge in data indexing and sorting algorithms. For mobile or low-power desktop builds where the 45W TDP is a priority, the AMD chip offers a compelling, if less universally powerful, package.