AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Intel Core 5 211TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive sweep: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS wins all 17 recorded head-to-head benchmarks against the Intel Core 5 211TE. The margin is consistent and often dramatic, with the largest gaps appearing in instruction-heavy workloads.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD part scores 24565 against Intel's 12201, a 101.3% advantage. Single-core R23 shows the same pattern: 3468 versus 1722, a 101.4% delta. The Cinebench R15 and R20 results are nearly identical in relative terms, with multi-core deltas of 101.5% and 101.3%, and single-core deltas of 101.7% and 101.4% respectively. These are effectively double the throughput in every rendering test.

The PassMark suite reveals where the architectures diverge most sharply. Extended instructions show the largest relative gap at 195.2%, with scores of 25434 versus 8615. Integer math follows at 187.2% (97625 against 33991), and data encryption at 183.3% (20487 versus 7231). Random string sorting delivers a 182.2% delta (41867 versus 14838), while single-thread performance is 167.2% higher (3762 versus 1408). Data compression trails at 157.8% (343952 against 133434), and multithread performance sits at 144.5% (28572 versus 11685). Floating point math shows a 125.5% edge (58965 versus 26150).

The narrowest margin in the entire comparison is PassMark physics, where AMD leads by only 8.7% (1389 versus 1278). Find prime numbers is also comparatively close at 20.8% (87 versus 72). These two results suggest that the Intel part retains some competitiveness in specific integer-heavy, low-parallelism tasks, but the overall trend is unambiguous.

The average benchmark score reinforces the gap: the AMD processor averages 39325 across the database, while the Intel part averages 15370. In percentile terms, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, whereas the Core 5 211TE sits at the 69th percentile. The nearest rivals for the AMD part include the AMD EPYC 4245P (0.3% higher average score), AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (0.4% lower), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (0.7% lower), and Intel Core i7-13700F (0.8% higher). The Intel Core 5 211TE, by contrast, trades positions with server-class EPYC parts and mobile chips: AMD EPYC 7543 (0.7% higher), AMD EPYC 7702P (1.6% lower), AMD Ryzen 3 7440U (2.0% higher), and Intel Core i3-1315U (2.3% lower).

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design lineages. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is built on Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD die measures 178 mm² with 25,000 million transistors; the Intel die is larger at 215 mm², though the database records no transistor count for it.

Core configurations differ in count but not in thread count. The AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part has 10 cores and 16 threads. Both support simultaneous multithreading, but the Intel part relies on two additional physical cores to reach the same thread count. Cache hierarchies also diverge: AMD allocates 64 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of shared L3. Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, with 20 MB of shared L3. The larger per-core L1 and L2 on the Intel side do not compensate for the overall performance deficit in the recorded benchmarks.

Clock speeds favor AMD substantially. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a 3.80 GHz base clock and a 5.10 GHz boost clock. The Core 5 211TE runs at 1.70 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost. Both parts carry a 45 W TDP, which makes the AMD part's clock advantage notable within the same power envelope.

Memory support differs in scope. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, but its bandwidth is recorded at 76.8 GB/s, lower than the AMD figure. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity also differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel part has a generational advantage in PCIe specification, but fewer lanes.

Integrated graphics set the two apart clearly. AMD integrates the Radeon 780M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The database records no direct graphics benchmark comparison, but the architectural difference is significant for systems relying on the iGPU.

Socket and platform details separate the two into different market segments. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses AMD Socket FP7, is classified as a mobile processor, and was released on 2024-04-15. The Intel Core 5 211TE uses Intel Socket 1700, is classified as a desktop processor, and was released on 2025-01-12. The AMD part has two recorded part numbers (100-000001316 for FP7r2 and 100-000001387 for FP7), while the Intel part has one (SRQDL). Neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $221, which is recorded once here and not discussed further.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS leads in every multi-core test. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 24565 versus 12201, a 101.3% advantage. The Cinebench R15 and R20 multi-core deltas are 101.5% and 101.3% respectively.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 211TE win any benchmark?

A: No. The database records 17 head-to-head benchmarks, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS wins all 17. The smallest margin is in PassMark physics at 8.7%, and the largest is in extended instructions at 195.2%.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. Both support 16 threads, but the Intel part requires more physical cores to achieve it.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports DDR5 only, with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Core 5 211TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. Both support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has the higher clock speeds?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a 3.80 GHz base clock and 5.10 GHz boost clock. The Intel Core 5 211TE has a 1.70 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock. Both have a 45 W TDP.

Q: How do the two processors compare in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS averages 39325 and sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 211TE averages 15370 and sits at the 69th percentile.

The Verdict

The data supports only one direction for performance-sensitive workloads. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS delivers roughly double the Cinebench throughput in both single-core and multi-core tests, and it extends that lead into PassMark integer math, encryption, compression, and extended instructions. The 86th percentile ranking against 69th percentile underscores the separation in overall CPU capability.

The Intel Core 5 211TE does hold specific structural advantages. It has 10 physical cores, larger L1 and L2 per core, 20 MB of L3 against 16 MB, DDR4 compatibility, PCIe Gen 5 support, and a desktop socket with a recorded launch MSRP of $221. These are platform-level considerations, not performance equalizers. The benchmark data shows no workload category where the Intel part closes the gap beyond the 8.7% physics result.

For systems where the integrated GPU matters, the AMD part uses the Radeon 780M while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730, an architectural distinction that favors AMD in the recorded specifications. For systems where DDR4 compatibility or PCIe Gen 5 is a hard requirement, the Intel part is the only one of the two that offers those options. For raw CPU throughput, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the clear choice according to every recorded measurement.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Intel Core 5 211TE |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Threads | 16 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 1.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Not recorded |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point)) | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-04-15 | 2025-01-12 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $221 |

| Part Number | 100-000001316 (FP7r2), 100-000001387 (FP7) | SRQDL |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 86 | 69 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 39325 | 15370 |