AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Intel Core 3 304 Comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and Intel Core 3 304 represent two very different approaches to mobile computing. The AMD part is a high-end 8-core processor from the 8000 series, while the Intel Core 3 304 is a low-power 5-core design from the Wildcat Lake family. The benchmark database shows a complete sweep in favor of the AMD processor, but the magnitude of those wins varies dramatically by workload type. This analysis walks through the recorded data to clarify where each chip actually stands.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most lopsided result in the database is Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 24565 against the Intel Core 3 304’s 5263. That is a 366.7% delta, the largest gap across all 17 recorded tests. The AMD chip’s 8 cores and 16 threads simply overwhelm the Intel part’s 5 cores and 5 threads in heavily parallel rendering workloads. A similar pattern appears in PassMark integer math, where AMD scores 97625 versus Intel’s 24640, a 296.2% advantage. Data compression also heavily favors AMD, with a score of 343952 compared to 114775, a 199.7% delta.

Single-threaded performance tells a different story in terms of margin. In PassMark single-thread, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 3762, while the Intel Core 3 304 scores 3614, a modest 4.1% delta. This is the closest result in the entire comparison. Cinebench R23 single-core shows a larger gap, with AMD at 3468 and Intel at 1765, a 96.5% delta. The gap in Cinebench R15 single-core is 32.2%, with AMD at 349 and Intel at 264. The PassMark single-thread result suggests that for lightly threaded tasks, the Intel part is not far behind, but the Cinebench figures indicate that the AMD architecture still holds a clear lead in certain single-core workloads.

Intermediate multi-core tests show consistent AMD dominance. Cinebench R20 multi-core gives AMD 10317 versus Intel’s 4160, a 148% delta, while Cinebench R15 multi-core shows 2476 against 849, a 191.6% delta. PassMark multi-thread follows the same trend, with AMD at 28572 and Intel at 11625, a 145.8% delta. Floating-point math in PassMark gives AMD 58965 against Intel’s 29722, a 98.4% delta, which is roughly half the margin seen in integer math. The extended instructions test shows AMD at 25434 versus Intel’s 9686, a 162.6% delta.

Encryption and physics workloads also favor AMD decisively. PassMark data encryption shows 20487 for AMD and 8501 for Intel, a 141% delta. PassMark physics gives AMD 1389 and Intel 868, a 60% delta. Random string sorting is another area of large separation, with AMD at 41867 and Intel at 13659, a 206.5% delta. The find prime numbers test is the smallest absolute difference, with AMD at 87 and Intel at 68, a 27.9% delta, though the raw numbers are low for both chips.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS wins all 17 recorded head-to-head benchmarks, so there is no test category where the Intel Core 3 304 comes out ahead. However, the degree of advantage varies, which points to where each chip is more or less competitive. The largest AMD margins appear in multi-core rendering, integer math, data compression, and random string sorting. These are workloads that scale well with core count and thread count, and the AMD chip’s 16 threads give it a structural advantage.

The Intel Core 3 304 is closest to AMD in PassMark single-thread, trailing by only 4.1%. This indicates that for everyday responsive tasks, such as basic office work or web browsing, the Intel chip can hold its own in a way that the multi-core results would not suggest. The find prime numbers test, where Intel trails by 27.9%, is the second-closest relative margin, and it is a workload that depends on raw integer throughput per core rather than parallel scaling. The physics test, with a 60% delta, is the next closest, and it still leaves Intel far behind.

For users who rely on rendering, compilation, or data-heavy batch processing, the AMD chip is the only viable choice based on the data. For users whose workloads are dominated by single-threaded tasks with short bursts of activity, the Intel chip is less disadvantaged but still loses every recorded benchmark. There is no scenario in the database where the Intel Core 3 304 takes a win, but the margin analysis shows that its single-thread performance is respectable relative to its core count and power envelope.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm process from TSMC, with the codename Hawk Point. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The chip has 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Cache is organized as 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. It supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and it includes ECC memory support. The integrated graphics are Radeon 780M, and the socket is AMD Socket FP7. The processor is part of the 8000 series, released on 2024-04-15.

The Intel Core 3 304 uses a 3 nm process from Intel’s own foundry, with the codename Wildcat Lake. It has 5 cores and 5 threads, with no hyperthreading, running at a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The cache structure differs significantly: 192 KB of L1, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth, and it does not support ECC. The integrated graphics are Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core. It uses Intel BGA 1516, and the release date is 2026-04-15. The launch MSRP is $309.

The transistor count and die size for the Intel chip are not recorded in the database, which prevents a direct comparison on those metrics. The process nodes differ, with AMD on 4 nm and Intel on 3 nm, but the AMD chip uses more cores and a larger cache hierarchy. The memory bus is another major split: AMD uses dual-channel while Intel uses single-channel, and that is reflected in the 89.6 GB/s versus 59.7 GB/s bandwidth figures. PCIe lanes also differ, with AMD offering Gen 4 with 20 lanes and Intel offering Gen 4 with 6 lanes. TDP is 45 W for AMD and 15 W for Intel, which explains the Intel chip’s lower clock speeds and reduced core count.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 24565, while the Intel Core 3 304 scores 5263, giving AMD a 366.7% advantage.

Q: How close are the two chips in single-threaded PassMark performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 3762 and the Intel Core 3 304 scores 3614, a 4.1% delta in favor of AMD.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth?

A: AMD supports dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel supports single-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports ECC memory, but the Intel Core 3 304 does not.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core 3 304 boosts to 4.30 GHz.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Intel Core 3 304 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 8 | 5 |

| Threads | 16 | 5 |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Not recorded |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Wildcat Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) |

| Release Date | 2024-04-15 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $309 |

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS wins every single recorded test, and the margins are often enormous. For multi-threaded workloads, including Cinebench R23 multi-core with a 366.7% delta and PassMark integer math with a 296.2% delta, the AMD chip is in a different performance class. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 5.10 GHz boost clock and 16 MB of L3 cache delivers results that the Intel Core 3 304 cannot approach. The AMD chip also offers dual-channel memory bandwidth, ECC support, and far more PCIe lanes, making it the more capable platform for demanding mobile applications.

The Intel Core 3 304 is a low-power part with a 15 W TDP, and its data reflects that positioning. The closest margin is in PassMark single-thread at 4.1%, which means the Intel chip is not hopeless in light workloads, but it still loses that test. For users prioritizing battery life and low power consumption, the Intel chip has a clear specification-level advantage in TDP, but the database contains no benchmark where that translates into a win. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core 3 304 sits in the 68th percentile, confirming the overall performance gap. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the AMD chip is the stronger processor in every measured workload, and the Intel chip is best understood as a power-efficient alternative that sacrifices performance across the board.