AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a complete benchmark profile for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, but no benchmark scores for the Intel Core 3 201TE. The head-to-head comparison is therefore one-sided. The AMD part delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,565, a result that places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,468 is equally notable. The AMD chip also posts a Passmark single-thread score of 3,762, a multithread score of 28,572, and an average benchmark score of 39,325.

The Intel Core 3 201TE has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, which reflects the absence of recorded measurements. Its percentile rank sits at 50, a default position that carries no direct performance comparison. No direct head-to-head benchmark entries exist for the two processors. Any attempt to quantify the Intel part's performance against the AMD part is not supported by the data. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the only processor in this comparison with verified scores.

The AMD chip's nearest rivals provide useful context for its performance level. The AMD EPYC 4245P averages 39,215, which is 0.3% behind the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 averages 39,485, 0.4% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS averages 39,603, 0.7% ahead. The Intel Core i7-13700F averages 39,009, 0.8% behind. These deltas are small, indicating that the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS sits in a tightly contested performance band among its closest rivals.

In the absence of Intel Core 3 201TE scores, the head-to-head section must rely on architectural specifications to differentiate the two parts. The AMD processor uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel processor uses 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD chip's boost clock reaches 5.10 GHz, compared to the Intel chip's 4.60 GHz. The AMD part also has a higher base clock at 3.80 GHz versus 2.90 GHz. These clock and core advantages align with the AMD part's strong benchmark presence in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename. It uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC and integrates 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, a 10 nm process node from Intel, and a 163 mm² die. The process node difference is substantial: the AMD chip's 4 nm process is considerably more advanced than Intel's 10 nm node, which typically allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency.

Cache configurations differ between the two parts. The AMD processor allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part's larger shared L3 cache (16 MB versus 12 MB) benefits workloads that repeatedly access a moderate-sized working set. The Intel part's larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations may help with latency-sensitive single-thread tasks, though the AMD part's higher clocks and greater core count dominate in the broader picture.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel access and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel access and a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both parts support ECC memory. The AMD chip's higher memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s) gives it an advantage in memory-intensive workloads such as large data processing and virtualization.

PCIe support also diverges. The AMD processor provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes. The Intel processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel part's PCIe Gen 5 interface offers higher per-lane bandwidth for compatible devices, though the AMD part offers more total lanes. The integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD chip uses the Radeon 780M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730.

The market segments differ. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets the mobile segment and uses AMD Socket FP7. The Intel Core 3 201TE targets the desktop segment and uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part was released on April 15, 2024, while the Intel part was released on January 12, 2025. Both processors are currently in active production. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part's part numbers are 100-000001316 (FP7r2) and 100-000001387 (FP7), while the Intel part's part number is SRPKDQ5CK.

The Intel Core 3 201TE has a launch MSRP of $134. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split between the two processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the only part in this comparison with benchmark scores in the database. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,565, its Passmark multithread score of 28,572, and its 86th percentile rank all indicate a processor that handles demanding multi-threaded workloads. Its 8 cores, 16 threads, 5.10 GHz boost clock, and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth reinforce that positioning.

The Intel Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark scores, which makes a direct performance verdict impossible from the database. Its specifications show a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor with a 4.60 GHz boost clock, 12 MB of shared L3 cache, and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Its launch MSRP is $134. The processor is positioned for desktop systems that require lower core counts but do not need the mobility profile of the AMD part.

For users selecting a processor based strictly on recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the choice for multi-threaded performance and mobile deployment. The Intel Core 3 201TE offers a desktop-oriented platform with PCIe Gen 5 support and dual-generation memory compatibility, but its performance characteristics remain unmeasured in the database. The AMD part's 86th percentile ranking versus the Intel part's default 50th percentile position further separates the two in the recorded hierarchy.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS boosts to 5.10 GHz. The Intel Core 3 201TE boosts to 4.60 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and the Intel Core 3 201TE each list ECC memory as supported.

Q: What memory types does the Intel Core 3 201TE support?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel access and a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What is the process node of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel Core 3 201TE uses a 10 nm process node from Intel.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 201TE have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a full set of Cinebench and Passmark scores.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS wins in every category where recorded data exists. Its Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2,476, R20 multicore score of 10,317, and R23 multicore score of 24,565 show strong multi-threaded rendering performance. Its single-core scores are equally strong: 349 in Cinebench R15, 1,456 in R20, and 3,468 in R23. Passmark results include a multithread score of 28,572, a single-thread score of 3,762, floating point math at 58,965, integer math at 97,625, and data compression at 343,952. The processor also records 20,487 in data encryption, 25,434 in extended instructions, 41,867 in random string sorting, and 1,389 in physics.

The AMD chip's architectural advantages support these results. Its 8 cores and 16 threads double the thread count of the Intel part. Its 5.10 GHz boost clock exceeds the Intel part's 4.60 GHz boost clock by 0.50 GHz. Its 16 MB of shared L3 cache exceeds the Intel part's 12 MB. Its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth exceeds the Intel part's 76.8 GB/s. Its 4 nm process node from TSMC is more advanced than Intel's 10 nm node. These factors combine to place the AMD part in the 86th percentile of all CPUs.

The Intel Core 3 201TE wins in the areas of platform flexibility and connectivity. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part supports only DDR5. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Its per-core L1 cache is 80 KB versus the AMD part's 64 KB, and its per-core L2 cache is 1.25 MB versus the AMD part's 1 MB. Its die size is 163 mm² versus the AMD part's 178 mm². It targets the desktop segment with Intel Socket 1700, while the AMD part targets the mobile segment with AMD Socket FP7. The Intel part also has a recorded launch MSRP of $134.

The use-case split follows these differences. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS suits mobile workstations and laptops that need high multi-threaded throughput, large shared cache, and high memory bandwidth. The Intel Core 3 201TE suits desktop builds that require DDR4 compatibility, PCIe Gen 5 devices, and a lower core-count footprint. The recorded data strongly favors the AMD part for raw performance, while the Intel part offers platform attributes that the AMD part does not match.