AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and the Intel Arc G3 occupy different corners of the mobile processor market. The Ryzen 7 PRO is a high-performance 8-core part from AMD’s 8000 series, built for demanding workloads. The Intel Arc G3, part of the Panther Lake generation, is a lower-power 14-core chip with a different architectural approach. The database contains a complete benchmark record for the AMD processor, while the Intel Arc G3 currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This asymmetry shapes the analysis, but the available data on specifications and the existing benchmark results for the AMD chip still allow for a detailed comparison.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table between these two processors is empty. The database shows zero wins for either side in direct comparative tests, and neither processor has a recorded score in the head-to-head section. This means there are no direct measurement results that pit the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS against the Intel Arc G3 in the same workload.

For the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, the database provides a full suite of benchmark scores. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the chip scores 2476 points, while the single-core test yields 349 points. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 10317, and the single-core score is 1456. The Cinebench R23 results show 24565 in multicore and 3468 in single-core. These numbers place the processor in the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 39325.

The PassMark results for the AMD chip cover several specialized workloads. Data compression scores 343952, data encryption reaches 20487, and extended instructions hit 25434. The find prime numbers test returns a score of 87, which is notably lower than other PassMark categories. Floating point math scores 58965, integer math reaches 97625, and the multithread score is 28572. Physics testing produces 1389 points, random string sorting scores 41867, and single-thread performance is recorded at 3762 points.

For the Intel Arc G3, the benchmarks array is empty. There are no Cinebench scores, no PassMark scores, and no other recorded measurements in the database. The average benchmark score for the Intel chip is listed as 0, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50. This does not imply the processor cannot perform work; it simply means no benchmark data has been collected and entered into the database for this part. The nearest rivals list for the Intel Arc G3 is also empty, so there are no relative comparisons available from recorded scores.

The absence of head-to-head benchmarks means the data does not support any direct win for either processor in a shared test. The only wins recorded in the database are the zero wins for both sides, which reflects the lack of comparative testing rather than any real performance outcome.

Where Each One Wins

Without head-to-head benchmark data, the analysis must rely on the recorded scores for the AMD chip and the architectural specifications for both processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS shows clear strengths in the workloads that have been measured. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24565 indicates strong rendering and CPU-intensive performance. The PassMark multithread score of 28572 supports this, showing robust parallel processing capability. For single-thread tasks, the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3468 and the PassMark single-thread score of 3762 confirm that the chip handles lightly threaded workloads effectively as well.

The AMD processor’s nearest rivals provide context for its performance tier. The AMD EPYC 4245P has an average score of 39215, which is 0.3 percent behind the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39485, putting it 0.4 percent ahead of the Ryzen 7 PRO. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, a close relative, scores 39603, which is 0.7 percent ahead. The Intel Core i7-13700F scores 39009, placing it 0.8 percent behind the Ryzen 7 PRO. These deltas are small, indicating that the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS sits in a competitive performance band near several other processors.

For the Intel Arc G3, the database records no wins because there are no benchmark scores. The processor’s architectural features, however, suggest different potential strengths. The chip has 14 cores and 14 threads, which indicates a design without simultaneous multithreading. Its base clock is 1.90 GHz and boost clock is 4.60 GHz. The memory bandwidth is listed at 136.5 GB/s, which is higher than the AMD chip’s 89.6 GB/s. This could benefit memory-intensive workloads, but without recorded benchmark data, this remains a speculative advantage rather than a measured one.

The Intel Arc G3 uses LPDDR5X memory, supports PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes, and integrates Arc B370 graphics. Its cache layout includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. The AMD chip uses DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and integrates Radeon 780M graphics. Its cache is 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. These differences do not translate into benchmark wins in the database, but they define the workload profiles each chip targets.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two processors is substantial. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture, with the Hawk Point codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake codename, built on a 3 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. The database does not list transistor count or die size for the Intel part.

Core counts differ significantly. The AMD chip has 8 cores and 16 threads, indicating simultaneous multithreading is enabled. The Intel chip has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning each core handles one thread. The AMD chip’s base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost of 5.10 GHz. The Intel chip’s base clock is 1.90 GHz with a boost of 4.60 GHz. The AMD part has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 25 watts. These figures show the AMD processor is designed for higher sustained performance at higher power, while the Intel processor targets lower power consumption.

Cache hierarchies differ as well. The AMD chip provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip provides 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip has more L1 and L2 per core, and more total L3, which could reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data. The AMD chip has a larger total L2 aggregate when multiplied across 8 cores, reaching 8 MB versus the Intel chip’s L2 aggregate of 35 MB across 14 cores. The Intel design dedicates more cache per core, which may help with single-thread performance, though no benchmark data confirms this.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD chip uses DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and supports ECC memory. The Intel chip uses LPDDR5X memory on a dual-channel bus with 136.5 GB/s bandwidth and does not support ECC. The higher memory bandwidth on the Intel chip could be relevant for integrated graphics or data streaming tasks, but again, the database has no benchmark results to verify this.

PCIe support differs. The AMD chip provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU. More lanes on the AMD chip allow more simultaneous devices, while the newer PCIe Gen 5 standard on the Intel chip offers higher per-lane bandwidth. The integrated graphics also differ: the AMD chip has Radeon 780M, while the Intel chip has Arc B370. Both are mobile processors, with the AMD chip using AMD Socket FP7 and the Intel chip using Intel BGA 2540.

The production status for both is Active. The release dates differ, with the AMD chip released in April 2024 and the Intel chip released in May 2026. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP in the database. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS: it is a measured, high-performance mobile processor with strong multi-threaded and single-threaded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24565, PassMark multithread score of 28572, and single-thread score of 3762 all indicate a capable part for demanding workloads. The 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 39325, confirms its position above the median. The nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and the Intel Core i7-13700F, sit within roughly one percent of its average score, showing that the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is competitive with other strong processors in its segment.

The Intel Arc G3 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile is 50, which reflects the absence of data rather than a measured performance level. The chip’s specifications, including 14 cores, a 25 watt TDP, 136.5 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 18 MB of L3 cache, suggest a design focused on efficiency and memory throughput. However, the database cannot confirm any performance advantage because no tests have been recorded.

For a user choosing between these two processors strictly from the database information, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the only option with verified performance data. The recorded benchmark scores show it handles rendering, compression, encryption, and general multithreaded work with strong results. The Intel Arc G3 offers no measured proof of its capabilities in this database, so any performance claim would be unsupported. The AMD chip also provides ECC memory support, which the Intel chip does not, and a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 4.60 GHz.

The Intel Arc G3 does have advantages in the recorded specifications. Its 14 cores exceed the AMD chip’s 8 cores, though with only one thread per core, the total thread count is 14 versus 16 for the AMD chip. The Intel chip has a lower TDP of 25 watts versus 45 watts, which may suit fanless or low-power designs. Its memory bandwidth is 52.6 percent higher in the listed figures, and its L3 cache is 2 MB larger. These are real differences, but without benchmark scores, they remain unverified in practice.

The verdict from the database is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is a tested, high-performing mobile processor, while the Intel Arc G3 is an untested part in the recorded data. Users who require measured performance should consider the AMD chip based on the available scores. Users who prioritize lower power consumption and higher memory bandwidth may find the Intel chip’s specifications appealing, but the database provides no evidence of its real-world performance. There is no recorded benchmark basis to declare the Intel Arc G3 superior in any workload, and no recorded basis to declare the AMD chip inferior in any workload.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS?

A: The average benchmark score is 39325, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the benchmark scores array for the Intel Arc G3 is empty. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile is 50.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 watts.

Q: Which processor has higher memory bandwidth in the database?

A: The Intel Arc G3 is listed with 136.5 GB/s memory bandwidth. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is listed with 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports ECC memory. The Intel Arc G3 does not support ECC memory.