AMD Ryzen 7 250 vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 Comparison

# Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data in the database splits cleanly between these two processors, but only one of them has recorded performance results. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 has a full suite of 15 benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark entries at all. This makes the comparison one-sided in terms of measured performance, but the architectural differences still define clear use-case separation.

The Ryzen 7 250 delivers its wins in every measured category because it is the only chip with recorded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14,676 points and single-core score of 1,715 points place it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The PassMark multithread score of 25,089 and single-thread score of 3,678 confirm strong all-around throughput. For workloads like video encoding, software compilation, and general productivity, the Ryzen 7 250 has the measured results to back its position.

The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 wins in categories that are not benchmarked. It offers 10 cores and 20 threads versus the Ryzen 7 250's 8 cores and 16 threads. It supports ECC memory, which the Ryzen 7 250 does not. Its integrated Radeon 880M graphics is a newer generation than the Radeon 780M in the Ryzen 7 250. These are structural advantages for embedded and reliability-focused deployments, even though no benchmark scores exist to quantify them.

# Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different architectural families despite sharing the same socket. The Ryzen 7 250 uses Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, built on a 4 nm TSMC process. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses a hybrid configuration of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores under the Gorgon Point codename, also on a 4 nm TSMC process. The die sizes differ: the Ryzen 7 250 measures 178 mm² with 25,000 million transistors, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P174 measures 233 mm² with no transistor count recorded in the database.

Cache layouts differ as well. The Ryzen 7 250 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The larger per-core L1 cache on the embedded part reflects its Zen 5 core design. Both chips use dual-channel memory, and both have a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Ryzen 7 250 supports DDR5 only, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Only the embedded chip supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs. The Ryzen 7 250 provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P174 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes. The socket is the same AMD Socket FP8 for both. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier. The Ryzen 7 250 has a part number of 100-000001722, while the embedded part's part number is listed as unknown.

Clock speeds favor the Ryzen 7 250. Its base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Both have a TDP of 28 watts, making them thermally comparable in the same class.

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two processors. All comparative analysis must come from the Ryzen 7 250's absolute scores and its nearest rivals in the database. That said, the Ryzen 7 250's recorded performance establishes a baseline that the embedded chip would need to beat, given its core count advantage.

The Ryzen 7 250's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14,676 places it slightly above the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, which has an average benchmark score of 38,194, a delta of 0.1 percent. It sits marginally below the Intel Core i5-13600HX, which has an average score of 38,261, a delta of -0.1 percent. The Ryzen 7 250's average benchmark score is 38,221. Its percentile rank of 86 means it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database.

In single-core Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 7 250 scores 1,715 points. The PassMark single-thread score is 3,678. These numbers indicate strong per-core performance, which matters for lightly threaded workloads like web browsing, office applications, and legacy software. The boost clock of 5.10 GHz is the highest among the two chips and helps explain this single-thread strength.

The Ryzen 7 250's multicore results are substantial. Cinebench R15 multicore scores 2,302, and PassMark multithread scores 25,089. The PassMark integer math score of 91,565 and floating-point math score of 53,285 show balanced arithmetic throughput. Data compression scores 300,708, while data encryption scores 17,661. Extended instruction set performance reaches 21,613. Prime number finding scores 73, physics scores 1,147, and random string sorting scores 35,861.

The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark scores to compare. Its 10 cores and 20 threads suggest it could outperform the Ryzen 7 250 in heavily parallel workloads, but the database does not contain measurements to confirm this. The lower base clock of 2.00 GHz compared to 3.30 GHz may limit lightly threaded performance, though the boost clock of 5.00 GHz is close to the Ryzen 7 250's 5.10 GHz.

# The Verdict

The data supports a clear split. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 is the only chip with measured performance, and its results show a capable mobile processor for general computing, productivity, and content creation workloads. Its 86th percentile ranking, combined with a 5.10 GHz boost clock and 16 MB of L3 cache, makes it a strong choice for systems where benchmark-verified performance matters. The nearest rivals in the database, including the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T and Intel Core i5-13600HX, sit within 0.2 percent of its average score, confirming that it trades blows with mainstream Intel offerings.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 targets a different audience. Its 10 cores, 20 threads, ECC memory support, and newer Radeon 880M graphics indicate a design focused on embedded systems, edge computing, and reliability-critical applications. The lack of benchmark scores in the database means its performance cannot be quantified, but its architectural advantages are documented. The support for LPDDR5X memory and ECC makes it suitable for always-on systems where data integrity matters more than raw speed. The larger die size of 233 mm² compared to 178 mm² reflects the added core count and integrated features.

For a buyer who needs verified performance today, the Ryzen 7 250 is the data-backed choice. For a buyer who needs ECC memory, more cores, and an embedded-class feature set, the Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is the only option between the two. The 28-watt TDP on both chips means thermal management requirements are identical, simplifying platform design.

# FAQ

Q: Which processor has better single-core performance?

A: The Ryzen 7 250 has a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 5.00 GHz on the Ryzen AI Embedded P174, and it scores 1,715 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3,678 in PassMark single-thread. The embedded chip has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports ECC memory. The Ryzen 7 250 does not.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Ryzen 7 250 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the difference in integrated graphics?

A: The Ryzen 7 250 uses Radeon 780M graphics. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses Radeon 880M graphics, which is a newer generation.

Q: Are both processors on the same socket?

A: Yes, both use AMD Socket FP8. They also share the same 4 nm TSMC process node and 28-watt TDP.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: The Ryzen 7 250 has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

# Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 250 | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 |

|----------------|-----------------|----------------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 5 / Zen 5c |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Gorgon Point |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | 233 mm² |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 16 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M | Radeon 880M |

| Part Number | 100-000001722 | Unknown |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2026-02-28 |